Posted on 03/15/2020 7:08:58 PM PDT by Helicondelta
Former Vice President Joe Biden promised at the Democrat debate on CNN and Univision Sunday night that he would nominate a “black woman” to the U.S. Supreme Court if he were elected president in November.
Asked what he would do to fight for women’s rights, Biden said: “Number one, I committed that if I’m elected president, to have an opportunity to appoint someone to the courts who will be — I will appoint the first black woman to the courts.”
Biden appeared to be referring to the Supreme Court.
He continued: “It’s required that they have representation now. It’s long overdue.”
Biden seemed to be endorsing the idea that the primary qualification for a Supreme Court justice would be race, gender, and the ability to “represent” a demographic section of the population.
(Excerpt) Read more at breitbart.com ...
Burisma and Uranium One!!
You mean like Sarah Palin? You mean like Janice Rogers Brown? The black woman President Bush nominated?
Identity politics. Nothing more.
Pander away slow joe.
Biden would probably appoint Rachel Jeantel to the Supreme Court. I do recall she wanted to be a lawyer once.
Stacy Winnebago Abrahams your next president because joe wont make it a full term
“...I will appoint the first black woman to the courts...”
Candace Owens Joe?
Yep. Because they worship color, sex, and kinks more than they care about individual personal character.
Bet he’s thinking Moochelle
Race, class, gender — the demonKKKrats in action.
... Now we are entering the Panderpalooza phase of the Democrats election cycle .....
Pedo Pander
LIEberals love a token over actual qualifications.
Biden appeared to be referring to the Supreme Court.
He continued: “It’s required that they have representation now. It’s long overdue.”
This is just another example of the DEMONRATS obsession with race, intersectionality, and identity politics. This addled, semi dementious moron actually thinks that the Supreme Court is a representative body. There actually is a branch of Congress called the HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES for that.
They have absolutely no conception of the purpose and constitutional intention of governance.
What about a man who identifies as a woman? Does he qualify? I would certainly think so because men can identify as women and participate in women’s sports. And win. And the only people who see anything insane about it are on the Right.
JRB was never nominated to SCOTUS.
He’d probably appoint Rachel Dolezal.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.