[tallyhoe]

It faltered because she is a D.S.

[Michigander222]

No, it failed because she’s crazy, annoying and a horrible human being.

[cnsmom]

EW is no Margaret Thatcher.

[The Toll]

Anti-Indigenous Bias

[mylife]

The Old Pu**y Card!

[Still Thinking]

Don’t know. Is ‘shrew’ a gender these days?

[MV=PY]

"Did Elizabeth Warren's Campaign Fail Because Of Her Gender?"

I think it failed because of her lack of gender.

[Telepathic Intruder]

Sure, blame the voters. And when a movie doesn’t make money, it’s the fault of the audience. We’re not good enough for the elites, so we need a different system where the common person’s opinions don’t matter.

[P-Marlowe]

Her voice was like fingernails on a chalkboard. Her mannerism were like one of those inflatable tube men that are outside the Jiffy Lube. Her message was warmed over Marxism. Every time she opened her mouth she contradicted the previous sentence.

Gee I don’t know why the Dems didn’t like her. She was the perfect candidate. They must just be a bunch of Indian hating sexists.

[Berlin_Freeper]

Trump eliminated Pocahontas long ago.

[bramps]

I googled antonym for ‘attractive’ and Warren’s photo came up.

[Popman]

Grey Beaver acting like your drunk mother in law probably turned a lot of people off.

Plus she is a lying stinking nut case,

[albie]

Good grief. No reason to go past the headline.

[The people have spoken]

It failed because she’s a fake Indian. She scammed the affirmative action system to get tenure at Harvard. After getting called out for that, she ran for president. No surprise that she failed.

[Seruzawa]

She’s not a grammar term. She doesn’t have “gender”.

[KingofZion]

It failed because Bernie was hogging her lane and there wasn’t enough oxygen for two loonies on the left. If Sanders cardiacs out she would easily be going toe to toe with Biden.

This left her with a base of educated suburban woman. Which is a key component for the general election, but not sufficient to get you above water in the Dem primary.

Really the headline should be “Would fauxcahontas have even made it to Super Tuesday if she wasn’t a woman? (because she’d be polling 3%)

[caww]

No not because of her gender.....her agenda wasn't far from Sanders and she was worse than Romney at deception and switching. Add in her teacher hag condescending attitude and screeching speeches....well the equation fell far short of desirable to the public.....except the women who were voting for her because she's a woman.

[Colinsky]

We took a gander at her gender, and goosed her.

[DBrow]

She was promising “deep structural changes to the United States” without really saying what those were. Being wary of that is not misogyny.

[SkyDancer]

No. Her mouth.