And you thought it was over...
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-20, 21-28 next last
To: yesthatjallen
A judge appointed by obama..er..GWB.
This time they REALLY have Trump
2 posted on
03/05/2020 2:51:35 PM PST by
dp0622
(Radicals, racists Don't point fingers at me I'm a small town white boy Just tryin to make ends meet)
To: yesthatjallen
Another Obama resistance judge..
3 posted on
03/05/2020 2:51:51 PM PST by
CMailBag
To: yesthatjallen
Mueller testified for two days at least. These evil bastards will keep beating this dead horse over and over.
4 posted on
03/05/2020 2:52:13 PM PST by
ilgipper
(The mob only destroys. Never creates.)
To: yesthatjallen
I’d tell the judge to F off
To: yesthatjallen
Order away, Reggie.
And go pound sand.
6 posted on
03/05/2020 2:54:06 PM PST by
sauropod
(David Horowitz: “Inside every progressive is a totalitarian screaming to get out.”)
To: yesthatjallen
How about the Mueller report on Iraq’s WMDs?
7 posted on
03/05/2020 2:54:49 PM PST by
TwelveOfTwenty
(Prayers for our country and President Trump)
To: yesthatjallen
None dare call it treason.
8 posted on
03/05/2020 2:56:00 PM PST by
MrBambaLaMamba
(All evil and bad things originate in China)
To: yesthatjallen
Oh. So the reports do not agree, but it was MUELLER who got it right and BARR who got it wrong? Mueller, who could not utter a coherent sentence in his testimony? And the resolution lies in the revelation of a few redacted details in the Mueller report?
BS.
To: yesthatjallen
Sorry judge...you are not cleared to see this. You can ask the supremes.
To: yesthatjallen
What, coronavirus hasn’t killed enough people to satisfy the commies so they are back to this crap
To: yesthatjallen
So then the entire report doesn’t conflict with Barr’s summary, but this judge thinks the redactions will prove Barr a liar.
Didn’t Mueller testify there was nothing inaccurate in Barr’s summary?
12 posted on
03/05/2020 2:58:24 PM PST by
Williams
(Stop Tolerating The Intolerant)
To: yesthatjallen
Buzzfeed FOIAs? Buzzfeed? They have any credibility?
14 posted on
03/05/2020 3:00:14 PM PST by
calenel
(Don't panic. Prepare and be vigilant.)
To: yesthatjallen
My prediction: this will make it to the appellate courts and be reversed.
That said, I’m all for seeing an unredacted version as Pencilneck Schiff couldn’t pull anything bad from his access, and an unredacted version will likely lead to exposing Democrat/FBI wrongdoing.
Ergo, I’m all for this.
15 posted on
03/05/2020 3:00:31 PM PST by
Smedley
(It's a sad day for American capitalism when a man can't fly a midget on a kite over Central Park)
To: yesthatjallen
Judge Reggie B. Walton Oh, I remember now. He's the one who talks and thinks like a character in a sit-com.
To: yesthatjallen
I would say produce it without the redactions. Let the judge take responsibility if there are any adverse repercussions.
To: yesthatjallen
Deep State needs that unredacted report to generate more false accusations. So, they use Deep State judge to get it. Sure. The rule of law is being leached away more every day.
21 posted on
03/05/2020 3:04:41 PM PST by
backwoods-engineer
(Politics is the continuation of war by other means. --Clausewitz)
To: yesthatjallen
If: Dorkbama appointed judge
Then: We absolutely, positively do not give a shi...er...give a Dorkbama.
Test: It was a Dorkbama appointed judge.
Conclusion?
To: yesthatjallen
Judge is not qualified to read the redacted report. Go to hell you ars hole judge.
To: yesthatjallen
Appeal and have the “Judge” slapped down by the SC again.
29 posted on
03/05/2020 3:28:40 PM PST by
MNJohnnie
(They would have abandon leftism to achieve sanity. Freeper Olog-hai)
To: yesthatjallen
FISA Judge trying to cover up his corruption. Read his background
30 posted on
03/05/2020 3:30:10 PM PST by
MNJohnnie
(They would have abandon leftism to achieve sanity. Freeper Olog-hai)
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-20, 21-28 next last
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson