Posted on 02/04/2020 1:35:40 PM PST by Morgana
This is the shocking moment an Iowa caucus member demands to change her vote after she realizes Pete Buttigieg is gay and married to a man.
Former South Bend mayor Buttigieg declared himself victor of the Iowa caucus just after 11pm Central time on Monday, even though there are no official results.
But as this clip shows one unidentified woman tried to get her vote back after hearing the news he is married to his partner of five years, Chasten.
In the footage she asks Buttigieg precinct captain, Nikki van den Heever: 'Are you saying that he has the same-sex partner? Pete?'
When Heever replies 'yes', the woman responds: 'Are you kidding? Then I don’t want anybody like that in the White House. So can I have my card back?'
Wearing a Buttigieg badge as well as an Amy Klobuchar button the woman continues: 'Well he better read the Bible.' It is not known if she changed her vote.
Scroll down for video
(Excerpt) Read more at dailymail.co.uk ...
This is clearly not shocking. Democrats are by default, low information voters. They know practically nothing about their politicians and only know they must follow orders and vote for democrats.
I find it nice to see at least one democrat woke up, if only for a minute and if only about one democrat. She will be back to sleep momentarily.
JoMa
L8R.
Or instead of dreaming we can get off our butts and talk to everyone we know about how important it is to re-elect President Trump, preferably showing them how his presidency benefits EVERYONE, black or white, rich or poor, male or female.
I joined the conservative movement because I was tired of the abuses of power under the 0bama administration and wanted limited government. A government with all these restrictions on who can vote and who can’t doesn’t sound very limited to me. In fact it sounds like a mirror image of the Democrats, as E. Pluribus Unum’s tagline so wisely says. The Dems would like to take away our (deplorables’) right to vote if they reasonably thought they could get away with it. Let’s not set that precedent.
In any event none of the Dem candidates can hold a candle to Trump when it comes to connecting with the working people. I may be the resident optimist of FR but I think Trump will have an easy re-election in November. Give Trump some credit for having made it this far.
Pete Buttigieg’s married partner is HIS husband. This means, should Pete Buttigieg ever be elected President, not only would he be the President, he would also be the First Lady as well.
+1.
I CAST THEE OUT!
Talk about an uninformed voter...
Another moron who has no clue on any of the candidates but votes for such things as good hair.
I agree with your points.
If the Constitution had inviolable rules about who the voters were/are, the size of government, at all levels, would be much smaller and less tyrannical. We wouldn’t be in the today’s mess, IMO.
Confusion seems to reign supreme, with this crowd ! Thanks.
Nice self-indulgent diatribe, but that’s not what we were talking about.
Thanks for playing, though.
Fellow Americans:
Operant conditioning via electromagnetic programming and...horrible “food” consumed may have contributed to your anxious disintegrating mindset. Other factors may include dangerous medications and toxic family, friends and acquaintances. Lack of a positive philosophy is not helpful. Find YOU. Regards.
Her gaydar is broken.
Not most, but about 1/3, and when you consider they're about 2% of the population, it's incredible how over represented they are.
What rock has this gal been hiding under?
Of course, Mayor Pete is queer.
So no military or LEOs?
Sally.
Please tell me that there is video of that. LOL
My sympathies are with the military but, according to my scenario, no. People vote their paycheck. Nevertheless, this might be the one exception I would make, for the military, if I were the Emperor of the Universe.
Regarding LEOs, definitely NO. Check this out: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=owfYIDKwzZo
Its hard to get things right the first time, regarding the choices the founders made. But with nearly 250 years of experience, my choices reflect hard lessons learned.
Like I indicated above, this is just my dream. Parts of this could be in error.
The no singles being allowed to vote is bupkis. What if a conservative male or female becomes widowed? What if a conservative loses there spouse due to the other spouse checking out of the marriage?
My mother was a single mother most of my life and was a staunch conservative voter most of my life. I guess if she was still here with us she should not have the right to vote? Compare that to my father who married a dingy democrat voter over 2 decades ago. Also, I am single and have not settled down yet, I guess I have no skin in the game paying taxes and all, especially that fascist Obamacare tax?
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.