Hahaha - I didn’t catch that !! !
Cuck Justice John Roberts......PRICELESS
In Spring ‘21, impeach Roberts for judicial malfeasance.
Nominate C. Thomas to become 1st AA CJ.
Nominate a young Originalist to replace Thomas as a justice.
After a couple years, Thomas leaves in his RV and a youngish CJ is nominated to replace him.
Chief Injustice Roberts got outplayed by the smarter Rand Paul.
If you know what someone is going to do, you can use that to your advantage, and he did.
And this will be ignored by the media as well.
Nah. It That GIRL!
If revealing the name of the “whistleblower” is illegal, and not even Schiff (so he says) knows the name of the whistleblower, then how did Roberts recognize the name of the whistleblower, unless somebody — illegally! — revealed the name to Roberts?
So who illegally outed the whistleblower to Roberts?
All in all, just to have to sit through all that bovine excrement and not blow up is pretty incredible.
As for the question, yep, appears he knew who the whistleblower was, the GOP could have brought forward a motion to require the reading. The answer wouldn't have changed any minds nor been under oath. A justifiable decision to not bring any new evidence to the trial.
And honestly, had the question been read and an obviously false response been given, the witness calling vote would likely have gone different, especially to get the under oath deposition of the whistleblower.
We'd have at least another week of this nonsense.
But hey, let us by all means continue the farce that Roberts is incompetent or in the pockets of liberals.
I guess that Constitution thing is adjustable for ole’ John, too huh?
Wish Trump would Tweet that he wants to hear the whistle blowers testimony.
Chuck Schumer takes it in the ### with no lube from Chief Justice Roberts. pic.twitter.com/NBH2u4RxFe— CHIZ 🇺🇸 (@CHIZMAGA) February 1, 2020
Eric Ciaramella is the whistleblower but John McNuts got everything started...way back with the dossier. Burn in hell McNuts!
How would Justice Roberts know the identity of the alleged whistleblower?
The Rand Paul question does not say anything about the term “whistleblower.”
Yep - and the next day’s question that got through was the same only instead of using the name w/o the “whistleblower” descriptive, it used the “whistleblower” descriptive w/o the name - I’d like to think he’s pleased it worked out that way.