If revealing the name of the “whistleblower” is illegal, and not even Schiff (so he says) knows the name of the whistleblower, then how did Roberts recognize the name of the whistleblower, unless somebody — illegally! — revealed the name to Roberts?
So who illegally outed the whistleblower to Roberts?
I don't know if revealing the name of the so-called whistleblower is illegal, but if it is, then Justice Roberts could be in trouble. The Constitution, Article I, section 6 provides immunity to "Senators and Representatives" "for any Speech or Debate in either House," but does not provide immunity to, e.g., Justices of the Supreme Court.
#15. Roberts is NOT AS SMART as people thought he was. He’s a bit of a squish, a fop, a phony, all rolled into one.
Let’s hope that Justice Ginsberg either gets too sick to continue and retires, or just plain drops dead in the street (ok, for dignity’s sake, in the Court).
Talk on TV yesterday was that the President’s counselor Philbin would make a great, young Supreme Court justice, which could move Thomas up to Chief Judge (for a while), and then have Justice Alito move into the Chief’s position.
If all this occurs within the next three years (And Trump has a good majority in Congress), with Ginsburg gone, you’d have Thomas in charge until he retired, allowing Alito to succeed him, with a new justice (say Philbin in place) and a NEED FOR ANOTHER JUSTICE TO TAKE Thomas’ place if he retired and there is an opening for Alito’s position.
God, help the good guys, please. Our country needs some extra help. Trump, Tom Fitton, Sidney Powell, Dershowitz, Sekulow, Philbin, etc. can’t do it all by themselves (not forgetting Sara Carter, John Solomon, Gregg Jarrett, etc).
It’s not illegal. Period.
Full stop.
NOT ILLEGAL.