Posted on 01/31/2020 7:05:27 PM PST by E. Pluribus Unum
Hahaha - I didn’t catch that !! !
Cuck Justice John Roberts......PRICELESS
(HeeHeeHeeHee!!)
In Spring ‘21, impeach Roberts for judicial malfeasance.
Nominate C. Thomas to become 1st AA CJ.
Nominate a young Originalist to replace Thomas as a justice.
After a couple years, Thomas leaves in his RV and a youngish CJ is nominated to replace him.
Chalk one up for Sen Paul also...
Oh Good, I don’t have to call him “Charming Marshmallow” to hide his identity any longer.
Chief Injustice Roberts got outplayed by the smarter Rand Paul.
If you know what someone is going to do, you can use that to your advantage, and he did.
And this will be ignored by the media as well.
Roberts stepped in it. If he had declined the question without explanation, there would have been a kerfluffle, also, so basically Roberts was trapped by one of those “when did you stop beating your wife” kind of situations.
That what he gets for being corrupt and making up laws that don’t exist.
And Paul predicted his corrupt action, and used it against him.
How can that make the msm news and how can it be used?
Force Roberts to recuse himself?
Replaced by Justice Clarence Thomas?
Such would make great US History.
Nah. It That GIRL!
Paul is remarkable. I don’t always agree with him, but he has better character and intellect than a lot of public figures I could name .
If revealing the name of the “whistleblower” is illegal, and not even Schiff (so he says) knows the name of the whistleblower, then how did Roberts recognize the name of the whistleblower, unless somebody — illegally! — revealed the name to Roberts?
So who illegally outed the whistleblower to Roberts?
Citronella
see tag line
Rand Paul is not part of the establishment, not part of the elite, not a patrician. He’s just a citizen Senator. Wish we had 99 more like him.
Let’s not forget there were some (alleged) conservatives almost cheering when he got assaulted by the leftist neighbor.
I grow that stuff over here.
And have a MUCH higher regard for it than for him.
I don't know if revealing the name of the so-called whistleblower is illegal, but if it is, then Justice Roberts could be in trouble. The Constitution, Article I, section 6 provides immunity to "Senators and Representatives" "for any Speech or Debate in either House," but does not provide immunity to, e.g., Justices of the Supreme Court.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.