Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

WATCH: Pete Buttigieg Has a Disgusting Response to a Pro-Life Democratic Woman
Townhall ^ | 01/27/2020 | Beth Baumann

Posted on 01/27/2020 7:55:08 AM PST by SeekAndFind

Former South Bend, Indiana Mayor Pete Buttigieg told a pro-life woman in Iowa she had no place in the Democratic Party. The comment came during a town hall with Fox News' Chris Wallace in Des Moines, Iowa when a voter asked Buttigieg if he supported a change in the party's language.

"I am a proud pro-life Democrat, so do you want the support of pro-life Democrats, Democratic voters? There's about 21 million of us," voter Kristen Day asked Buttigieg. "And, if so, would you support more moderate platform language in the Democratic Party to ensure that the party of diversity and inclusion really does include everybody?"

"Well, I respect where you're coming from and I hope to earn your vote, but I'm not going to try to earn your vote by tricking you," he replied with a smile. "I am pro-choice and I believe that a woman ought to be able to make that decision."

The crowd applauded and Buttigieg attempted to spin his answers.

"Here's what I can tell you – I know that the difference in opinion that you and I have is one that we have come by honestly and the best that I can offer – and it may win your vote, if not I understand – the best that I can offer is that if we can't agree on where to draw the line, the next best thing we can do is agree on who should draw the line," he explained. "And, in my view, it's the woman who's faced with that decision in her own life."

The crowd applauded again and Wallace reminded Buttigieg of one important tidbit: President Donald Trump made history on Friday when he became the first president to address the annual March for Life rally in Washington, D.C.

"I'm curious, Kristen, were you satisfied with the mayor's answer?" Wallace asked.

The voter replied, saying she was unsatisfied with Buttigieg's response. He failed to answer the second part of her question, which is whether or not he would support a change in the party's language and platform.

"And the second part of the Democratic platform contains language that basically says we don't belong, we have no part in the party because it says abortion should be legal up to nine months, that the government should pay for it and there's nothing that says people have a diversity of views on this issue should be included in the party," the voter explained.

Kristen reminded Buttigieg that back in 1999 the Democratic Party platform had language that recognized that people have various views on abortion "but we're a big tent party that includes everbody."

She reiterated the second part of her question. He didn't come out and directly say "no" but his response could be summed up that way.

"Well, I support the position of my party, that this kind of medical care needs to be available to everyone and I support the Roe v. Wade framework that holds that early in pregnancy there are few restrictions and late in pregnancy there are very few exceptions," he responded with a smile. "And again, the best I can offer is we may disagree on that very important issue and, hopefully, we'll be able to partner on other issues."


TOPICS: Culture/Society; News/Current Events; Philosophy; Politics/Elections
KEYWORDS: abortion; buttigieg; prolife
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-22 next last

1 posted on 01/27/2020 7:55:08 AM PST by SeekAndFind
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: SeekAndFind

This sums up why, though I left the R party over 10 years ago, I could never vote for a democrat. The party’s platform is poison. If a democrat wants my vote, the first thing they are going to have to do is leave that party.


2 posted on 01/27/2020 7:56:39 AM PST by cuban leaf (The political war playing out in every country now: Globalists vs Nationalists)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: SeekAndFind
"I am a proud pro-life Democrat, so do you want the support of pro-life Democrats, Democratic voters? There's about 21 million of us,"

She's the problem, not Booty-gig. Pro life (and pro 2nd amendment) have no place in the 'rat party. She is betraying her pro-life principles by voting for pro-death 'rats. There is no 'rat candidate for president who is pro life. The woman is an idiot.

3 posted on 01/27/2020 7:59:19 AM PST by Sans-Culotte (With every passing day, I am a little bit gladder that Romney lost in 2012.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: SeekAndFind
Pete Buttigieg told a pro-life woman in Iowa she had no place in the Democratic Party

Well, while I have no use whatsoever for P. Booty Judge, that quote from the beginning of the article in no way resembles what the guy is reported to have said. He didn't even really imply it, either.

He just mealy-mouthed it and danced a buddy-jig around it -- which is what I'd have expected of him.

4 posted on 01/27/2020 8:02:57 AM PST by Migraine
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: SeekAndFind

Everything about Butt-plug-plug is disgusting.


5 posted on 01/27/2020 8:04:48 AM PST by from occupied ga (Your government is your most dangerous enemy)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Sans-Culotte

However, she IS WELL-POSITIONED to call him out — which gives her some value.


6 posted on 01/27/2020 8:04:52 AM PST by Migraine
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: Sans-Culotte

What does a militant faggie care about unborn life, anyway?


7 posted on 01/27/2020 8:06:24 AM PST by elcid1970 ("The Second Amendment is more important than Islam.")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: SeekAndFind

Of course the response is disgusting.
The man is a dork.
Period.
No, not because of who he boinks, but because he is just simply a dork.


8 posted on 01/27/2020 8:10:30 AM PST by Da Coyote
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: SeekAndFind

Being queer, mayor pete has no respect for life. e is a human failure at the most basic level


9 posted on 01/27/2020 8:12:47 AM PST by bert ( (KE. NP. N.C. +12) Progressives are existential American enemies)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: SeekAndFind

This piece of human dreck will be the nominee VP pick...


10 posted on 01/27/2020 8:15:53 AM PST by Popman
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Sans-Culotte

Pro-life Democrat.
Bible-based Christian Democrat.
Patriot Democrat.
Constitution-supporting Democrat.
Truthful Democrat.
Inclusive Democrat.

Oxymorons, all.


11 posted on 01/27/2020 8:19:23 AM PST by polymuser (It's discouraging to think how many people are shocked by honesty and so few by deceit. Noel Coward)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: SeekAndFind

So Buttyboy believes murdering children in the womb is okay. Sick!


12 posted on 01/27/2020 8:36:55 AM PST by From The Deer Stand
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: SeekAndFind

If her 21,000,000 number is accurate, and I don’t know if it is, that offsets the Never-Trumpers (Kristol, Romney, Flake, Sykes, Jennifer Rubin, David Brooks, etc.) many, many times over. The people we use repel “pro-life Democrats” at a visceral level that Trump does not. And many of them are on swing states.


13 posted on 01/27/2020 8:41:13 AM PST by Dr. Sivana (There is no salvation in politics)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Popman

I doubt it. It’s going to be a black woman.


14 posted on 01/27/2020 8:53:42 AM PST by napscoordinator (Trump/Hunter, jr for President/Vice President 2016)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 10 | View Replies]

To: cuban leaf
So you left the R party because you can’t stand the democrat party. Makes perfect sense to me. 😳
15 posted on 01/27/2020 9:30:56 AM PST by Cobra64 (Common sense isnÂ’t common anymore.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: napscoordinator

“I doubt it. It’s going to be a black woman.”
I’m sure its going to be Moochie. She received a Grammy last night for reading her book. Like zero received the Nobel for things he might do in the future.


16 posted on 01/27/2020 9:34:31 AM PST by duckman ( Not tired of winning!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 14 | View Replies]

To: SeekAndFind

This poor woman has not been able to figure out that she is enabling the murder of the unborn.


17 posted on 01/27/2020 9:34:36 AM PST by McGavin999 (Queen Fancy Nancy Of North Poopistan)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Cobra64

No, I left the R party because of Bush and the spineless R’s. Think about it. Two R’s that were basically democrats are McCain and Romney. They are/were outside the mainstream party.

Yet they were the candidates running against Obama.

Before Trump, I believed the two parties were playing a game of “good cop, bad cop” against all of us. I called them the Uniparty.

Trump is ripping that to shreds.

But I didn’t “become a democrat.” Tjhe R’s are right of the D’s, and I’m right of the R’s. That’s why a democrat will never get my vote.


18 posted on 01/27/2020 9:47:26 AM PST by cuban leaf (The political war playing out in every country now: Globalists vs Nationalists)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 15 | View Replies]

To: SeekAndFind

Of course I agree with this woman and mayor Pete is quite repulsive in many ways. BUT, the article and the lead sentence are quite misleading. Not watching the video but from the text it seems he replied to her politely and he most certainly did not tell her, himself, that she has no place in the D party. I mean I wish he had been rude & vicious to her, because it would make him and the Ds look bad, but that doesn’t seem to be what happened.

They are all in on the baby killing this go-round, so of course no pro-life person of any party or no party should vote for any of them. For any office. (See tagline!)


19 posted on 01/27/2020 10:04:29 AM PST by jocon307 (Dem party delenda est!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: SeekAndFind

So says a Sodomite to a heterosexual woman.


20 posted on 01/27/2020 11:24:05 AM PST by jmacusa ("If wisdom is not the Lord, what is wisdom?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-22 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson