Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Not a single Democrat voted to protect women’s sports from transgender cheats’…
citizenfreepress.com ^ | 1/19/20 | Kane

Posted on 01/20/2020 3:58:27 AM PST by a little elbow grease

Florida Republican Congressman Greg Steube reports that not a single Democrat voted in favor of a bill that would protect women’s sports from biological males who claim to be transgender women.

Steube, a former Army JAG officer and Iraq War veteran, recently introduced a bill that would have banned “schools from using Title IX federal funds to support women sports if biological men are allowed to compete with them.”

“We are completely eroding what women sports are if we are going to allow biological men to compete with women in women’s collegiate activities. I filed pretty much what my bill is as an amendment on the ERA legislation that went through the Judiciary committee and not a single Democrat voted for it,” the first-term congressman continued. “We did it as a motion to recommit on the floor of the house on similar legislation, and I believe there was only one or two Democrats that voted for it. That’s the sad state of affairs that we are in for today. You are destroying women sports, and Democrats aren’t willing to stand for women in women sports.”

(Excerpt) Read more at citizenfreepress.com ...


TOPICS: Constitution/Conservatism; Crime/Corruption; Philosophy
KEYWORDS: competition; florida; genderdysphoria; gregsteube; homosexualagenda; sports; teamromney; title9; titleix; transgenders; women
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-55 last

41 posted on 01/20/2020 9:43:50 AM PST by SunkenCiv (Imagine an imaginary menagerie manager imagining managing an imaginary menagerie.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: a little elbow grease

True, they are mentally ill. They aren’t looking out for best interest of women, they are trying to say Republicans are sexists...no they are...


42 posted on 01/20/2020 10:01:19 AM PST by Deplorable American1776 (Proud to be a DeplorableAmerican with a Deplorable Family...even the dog is, too. :-))
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: a little elbow grease

So they’ve thrown God and babies under the bus, to pander to the left. They’ve thrown blacks under the bus to pander to the Hispanic vote, and now they’ve thrown women under the bus to pander to the transgenders. Is there anybody left for them to throw under that big bus?


43 posted on 01/20/2020 12:32:05 PM PST by mass55th ("Courage is being scared to death, but saddling up anyway." ~~ John Wayne)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: a little elbow grease
Perhaps this article below may be as entertaining to you as it was to me.

Published in 1903 by the "The Atlantic".

Yes! THAT Atlantic!

Some really interesting thoughts brought up in this article.

Long, but worthy of a reading.:

Why Women Do Not Wish the Suffrage

44 posted on 01/20/2020 12:34:13 PM PST by invoman
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: invoman

Thank you........ I will read it!


45 posted on 01/20/2020 1:15:25 PM PST by a little elbow grease (... to err is human, to admit it divine ...)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 44 | View Replies]

To: a little elbow grease
During college Richards began dressing as a woman, which at the time was considered to be a perversion, with transsexualism classified as a form of insanity

I can attest to the insanity thing, having did a stint in NYCs West Village. Real sickos...

46 posted on 01/20/2020 1:27:57 PM PST by JonPreston
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 27 | View Replies]

To: a little elbow grease

Yes on an island far away.


47 posted on 01/20/2020 3:13:25 PM PST by Vaduz (women and children to be impacIQ of chimpsted the most.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 39 | View Replies]

To: a little elbow grease

More reason not to vote for any democrat!


48 posted on 01/20/2020 4:26:16 PM PST by maxwellsmart_agent
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: a little elbow grease

More reason not to vote for any democrat!


49 posted on 01/20/2020 4:26:17 PM PST by maxwellsmart_agent
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: a little elbow grease

More reason not to vote for any democrat!


50 posted on 01/20/2020 4:27:04 PM PST by maxwellsmart_agent
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: a little elbow grease
Did you get a chance to read that article?

If so, what did you think of it?

51 posted on 01/25/2020 9:13:04 AM PST by invoman
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 45 | View Replies]

To: invoman
Did you get a chance to read that article? If so, what did you think of it?

_________

No, I have not. I've been engrossed (grossed out)by the impeachment insanity. I will start it as I see that it is written by someone who actually knows how to write.

____

It begins:

"IN 1895 the women of Massachusetts were asked by the state whether they wished the suffrage. Of the 575,000 voting women in the state, only 22,204 cared for it enough to deposit in a ballot box an affirmative answer to this question. That is, in round numbers, less than four per cent wished to vote; about ninety-six per cent were opposed to woman suffrage or indifferent to it."

Before I go any further I assume in 1895 that most women (as females) did not think they were equipped ("meant") to know enough to vote.

Personally I don't think most of them are equipped today.

I'll read it.

One more thing, generally we all would be better off if only property owners could vote. Just a thought.

;-)

52 posted on 01/25/2020 10:04:33 AM PST by a little elbow grease (... to err is human, to admit it unusual...)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 51 | View Replies]

To: a little elbow grease
No disagreement here (with property owners).

The article really brings up some very interesting thoughts and ideas of the difference in the sexes (concerning government) that I hadn't heard expressed before.

Of course the article will seem "sexist" to some, but it really rang true for me on so many levels.

Let me know your thoughts after you've read it?

53 posted on 01/25/2020 10:24:03 AM PST by invoman
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 52 | View Replies]

To: invoman
I read it. It's well written but it certainly was a different day for all of us/them.

Suffice it to say that if we all were much more well informed today these types of essays would not be as necessary.

So......... lets read up on our civics ...... AFTER we throw mounds of dirt on Adam Schiff and THE LEFT.

:-)

54 posted on 01/25/2020 10:34:59 AM PST by a little elbow grease (... to err is human, to admit it unusual...)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 53 | View Replies]

To: a little elbow grease

Looks like transgenderism is the end of feminism.


55 posted on 01/25/2020 10:37:01 AM PST by Repealthe17thAmendment
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-55 last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson