Posted on 12/11/2019 5:41:08 AM PST by janetjanet998
10 am at the Senate Committee on the Judiciary hearing: Examining the Inspector Generals Report on Alleged Abuses of the Foreign Intelligence Surveillance Act.
I can't help you out, I don't watch networks like CNN or MSNBC..
Horofits is owned and he is doing as his masters have commanded ... he is obfuscating so the truth will not be exposed, that the oabamroid regime weaponized the Intel and fbi to spy on political opposition and fabricate soemthign to defang them. All while doing their criminal enterprise thuggery in the Ukraine!
I agree.. love it. This will only be discussed on Fox News, OANN, and conservative online and print media of course. The lamestream media will ignore it as usual.
Ugh, Crazy Maisie up now...
+1
LOL! I HEAR ya’.
HIGH Roni is going to get nothing, however, but will squeal anyway, as is her consistent mode of operation.
I swear this woman...what’s her name...Crazy Homo? Does this woman have a single digit IQ?
I must be on time delay on the internet, because the HI wench is up now. Just the sound of her voice makes me ill. fingernails on a chalk board. Man is she reall dumb. OK, again with the political bias...., trump lied,...yada yada yad....thanks HI for this fool.
If you mean Kevin Clinesmith, no, he resigned, as one often does before he or she gets the inevitable “You’re Fired!”
Article in today’s Atlanta paper about NYC sending their homeless to unsuspecting cities in GA and elsewhere. Likely happening nationwide.
Hirono is saying Barr and Durham exaggerated their characterization of the IG report.....this coming from a woman who believes Trump should be impeached for investigating crimes.
I don't know what you mean by underpinnings. To the extent that Carter Page was part of the investigation, yes, but the FBI started the investigation on the flimsy tip from the Australians.
She really hates the word “spying”
Hirono: It al depends on the definition of “spying”
if you alter an email so you can illegally get a warrant in a super secret court.. then you are spying,IMO
NoHonor is so clever.
The Russians have tried to manipulate our elections for decades. This is nothing new. Nor, in the case of the 2016 elections was it exceptional. Nor is it unique to Russia, nor is it unique to foreign countries acting in ways to affect our elections. The Clintons sent campaign staff to Israel to affect their elections, and Obama sent U.S. funds to support at least one opposition campaign in an Israeli election.
The hoax isn’t that the Russians interfered with our election. The hoax is that it amounted to a hill of beans, was abnormal, and was coordinated or facilitated by the Trump Campaign.
<< “ The FBI agent who lied for the FISA report still works in the same job!!!! Unbelievable. “ >>>
......
“Wray again.”
The usual retort to each the continuing revelation of the DS embeds still running around in the DC version of the FBI, a DC criminal enterprise and arm of the Democrat Party.
#sickofWray
That's not the "bias" that Horowitz is claiming he can't find evidence of. He is not claiming that he can't find bias the noun he can't find "bias" the verb. Republicans need to clean up what is meant by "bias." The noun and the verb DO NOT mean the same thing.
There was no political bias.
Actually, its even more narrow than that.
There was no evidence that political bias influenced the investigation.
Of course theres no evidence, because you cant prove a persons state of mind. This is just like Comey saying Hillary Clinton mishandled data, but they couldnt prove intent.
Duh! Of course not - how can you possibly prove intent, short of a confession?
What a BS defense.
Oh well, I think this hearing is serving a good purpose - its putting the Democrats on the defensive for the first time - and they have a very weak defense.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.