Posted on 12/09/2019 10:41:50 AM PST by janetjanet998
U.S. attorney John Durham issues a response to the DOJ IG report, saying his office does "not agree with some of the reports conclusions as to predication and how the FBI case was opened.
Thank God, a sliver of sanity.
Again...”hope springs eternal...”
Maybe after bag pipe practice?
There is also a loophole defense. There is no policy relating to spying on presidential campaigns, so nothing there to voiolate. IOW, this case is being viewed by Horowitz as no different from some crank call that some unknown dickweed might be a terrorist. Doesn;t take much to open that investigation and not apprise the target. Use that rule against a presidential campaign? No policy says otherwise.
on the user end of the crime, Obama let the application go to FISA without asking the FBI to verify. Taping a political enemy who is running for president is 10 times more than what Nixon did.
Hillary and Imam Obama are guilty of leading a coup on the president and that’s sedition.
And Rudy, as an officer of the Court, allowed to practice before the Federal Bar, and even SCOTUS-— as a “friend of the Court” could very well be “hatted” as a deputized investigator, and... no longer the Pres.’s lawyer. Think of that.
Did we expect him to out Comey & his gang??!!! lol
I think Durham is countering the false report that he told Durham there is no evidence of bias by top FBI officials.
Durham’s statement is very unusual. He must have felt a strong need to issue such a statement.
Horowitz relied on FBI to tell him the truth, the FBI and DOJ lacked Candor and should be indicted for lying to the IG like they said Mike Flynn did.
CNN still “shocked”
another CNN stooge CNN National Security and Legal Analyst,
Susan Hennessey
@Susan_Hennessey
·
24m
Completely bizarre and irregular for Durham to weigh in this way. Clearly designed to undercut Horowitz findings without providing any additional information
The Horowitz Report is as Dem-supporting as the Drudge Report.
If...as the IG claims...there was a predicate for the start of an investigation, then why..:
WAS THE PRESIDENT, DONALD TRUMP, NOT NOTIFIED OF THE NEED FOR AN INVESTIGATION. HE SHOULD HAVE BEEN THE FIRST TO KNOW.
I know many of us have offered this suggestion, but I wanted to highlight it.
Hey, Horowitz, WHAT WAS THE REASON THEY DID NOT TELL PRESIDENT TRUMP?
Because PDJT WAS THE ONE THE FBI “INTENDED...THAT’S RIGHT INTENDED TO INVESTIGATE.”
DO YOU SEE THE INTENT THERE, HOROWITZ????
No need for additional information, just indictments.
LOL at the title
Predictably, DU is having a hissy fit.
Wow! Durham just betrayed his country to Russia and went all in for Putin
Agree about Horowitz. He’s civil service so you need to catch him in wrongdoing to nail him. Give him the rope...
Yup...Durham and Barr would not have jumped out with their statements so quickly if they didn’t have the goods and they weren’t going to use them. Two shots across the bow. This is going to be fun.
Winning!
Good!
Anyone with a smidgeon of Common Sense could see the Intelligence (oxymoron) community engaged Crossfire Hurricane as a Sting Operation
Maybe after bag pipe practice?
I literally laughed out loud.
It’s a long game Lodi... not blackjack.
Little Odessa in Brooklyn, for example. Take a breath.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.