Posted on 11/22/2019 7:30:40 AM PST by rktman
Full header:
CNN Senior Legal Analyst: FBI's Peter Strzok Altering a FISA Warrant is Alarming, 'Doesn't Get More Serious'
CNN legal analyst and former U.S. Attorney for the Southern District of New York Preet Bharara, who was fired by President Trump in 2017, says the news that former FBI agent Peter Strzok altered or forged a FISA warrant application used against Trump campaign associate Carter Page is "alarming."
"That's kind of an alarming bit of news," Bharara said. "If there was an FBI agent sworn to uphold the constitution who can be proven to have altered a document in connection with a legal proceeding, including the obtaining of a FISA warrant, that's really serious. It doesn't get more serious on that."
"That's not a good thing. It's a terrible thing," he continued. "Law enforcement agents and prosecutors who work with them are sworn to uphold the constitution, sure, but actually even exceed the protections of the constitution. They have to be of the utmost integrity and the utmost candor. Especially when you're making a representation to the court, which is what a FISA application is. It's gotta be on the up-and-up."
(Excerpt) Read more at townhall.com ...
Not named in this excerpt.
Who named him?
No. None of the Deep State coup guys will be prosecuted. They have deep connections.
The little guys like Roger Stone who don’t have that benefit get sent off to prison.
Not him.
Well, closer than the other one anyway. :-) In any case, pretty sure whoever it is will skate.
I don’t think one FBI agent, acting alone, would/could alter court required documents. It has to go both up and down within the FBI.
The intended beneficiary of this federal crime is the democrat party and its vile 2016 candidate.
He was doing the bidding of the Kenyan from Indonesia.
Nothing will be done that could expose the Kenyanesian Usurpation because BOTH parties cooperated to violate the Constitution.
Chief Justice Roberts took an oath to uphold the Constitution and swore in an ineligible usurper anyway.
The Constitution is an illusion.
Strzok wasn’t the only one who altered docs:
Asked why this FISA application was different, Anderson said she believed “the sensitivity level of this particular FISA resulted in lots of very high-level attention both within the FBI and DOJ.”
“The General Counsel [Jim Baker] … personally reviewed and made edits to the FISA, for example,” Anderson said. “The Deputy Director was involved in reviewing the FISA line by line. The Deputy Attorney General over on the DOJ side of the street was similarly involved, as I understood, reviewing the FISA application line by line.” -—Washington Examiner
“Alarming.”
Puts on his shocked face.
They never in their wildest dreams ever thought Hilliary would lose..........................
““The General Counsel [Jim Baker] … personally reviewed and made edits to the FISA, for example,” Anderson said.”
Wasn’t there speculation a month or so back the Baker may have flipped?
Remember the Strzok text saying that the White House was running the whole operation?
THis is a FAKE headline. No one has names Strozk (yet) and to report otherwise makes us as bad as CNN.
We KNEW this way back when - why is this suddenly an issue to the left now? Or are they trying to bury the info with the impeachment?
Hahaha,,perfect!
Casey at the bat striking out was alarming. This is criminal and TREASON.
That smirk sets of my gaydar !
At 100 our of a possible 100.
They said an FBI lawyer altered the document. Strzok is not a lawyer but his girlfriend was. I’m sure she won’t be much longer. Unless it was some other lawyer in the FBI.
https://www.foxnews.com/politics/horowitz-finds-evidence-fbi-employee-altered-russia-probe-document
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.