Posted on 11/19/2019 6:46:57 AM PST by CWW
They need to go after this Lt. Colonel. Self important deep stater!
Sorry, I used the wrong term. Schiff confirmed he lied in a Congressional Hearing.
-PJ
Dems said similar things about Ollie North. They noted that Poindexter did not wear his uniform and North did so for effect. So are you saying the Dems were correct in their criticism of Col. North?
I think that you are correct, and the committee is going to great lengths to conceal it. I think that the truth will eventually be known, but I doubt that these hearings produce it.
Oh good grief, now he needs a break.
I turned my car radio off when he started talking about his immigrant father———I’m so sick of that stuff.
.
Yes. That is why I called it a “pre-civil war” perspective. And I mean I “loosely” compare it to the EU.
I keep thinking about, before the war, people calling themselves “virginians”.
I use this analogy, before the war, the country was like a brick wall. The bricks are states and the mortar is the FedGov.
But now it is a mortar wall with fifty little marbles embedded in it.
A TA 312 will work much better
Thanks—just figured that out myself. Unfortunately—after I’d already sent my post!
When did the military do away with fitness testing for its members? Or do these deep state creeps have a different set of rules for that too?
Changing his diaper
Does that out Vindman as the leaker?
It’s ironic that you can’t talk about intelligence with the intelligence committee.
Leftie Networks: There’s this strange conspiracy theory that the Deep State to out the president.
Um, Schumer said they would.
This smug, arrogant little pissant directly countermanded the policy of the CIC. Rep Ratcliffe tore him apart in the closed door hearings. I hope he gets a other shot today.
Since nobody claims to know who the whistelblower is, this is just a question to find out who all might have information about the call. Especially, since Vindmann claims the person he spoke to had "a need to know", there's possibility he might know more.
The GOP should quit treating Ciaramella as though he is the whistleblower, and treat him as though he's just another possible witness.
>What I don’t understand is why no one will outright ask him if he spoke to Eric Ciaramella about this.
I have no idea either, but questioning hasn’t started yet.
If the name comes up, Schiff will gavel like crazy.
So, the President is supposed to follow talking points?
Apparently, these Democrats believe they can convince the American people that it is somehow inappropriate for a POTUS to contradict established state department policy.
So they are going to call up deep state bureaucrats, one by one, to bitch about the swamp being drained, complain about the President ignoring their advice, and to question his motives for doing so.
With a Presidential election less than a year away, I doubt very much the American people will take kindly to the Democrats attempt to usurp their voting prerogative by impeaching the President, especially on such flimsy grounds.
All the President needs to say the these Democrats is:
Let the voters decide - Ill see you in the voting booth.
Devon Nunes: How is it possible for you to...out the whistleblower...if you dont know who he is? Good question!
Has anyone read the signs behind the republicans?
He's under the oath of office as a Representative in the United States Congress.
-PJ
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.