Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Live Thread - Impeachment Hearings 11/19/2019
You Tube PBS ^ | 11-19-2019 | cww

Posted on 11/19/2019 6:46:57 AM PST by CWW

They need to go after this Lt. Colonel. Self important deep stater!


TOPICS: Breaking News; Front Page News; News/Current Events; Politics/Elections
KEYWORDS: 116th; hearing; impeachment; live; ltcpresident; trump; trumpukraine; ukraine; vindman
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 121-140141-160161-180 ... 781 next last
To: Moonlighter
When Nunes told Vindman that he could answer the question or invoke the fifth amendment, Vindman's lawyer said that they were operating under the rules set forth by the chairman (Schiff). Nunes ask "which rule was he referring too". The lawyer stumbled and said that they were operating under the direction of the chairman. Schiff then interrupted.

No rules, just the whims of the chairman.

141 posted on 11/19/2019 7:59:24 AM PST by fhayek
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 135 | View Replies]

To: pnut22

>He doesn’t know who the whistle blower is and neither does Schitt or CNN. Just ask them.

Yeah, if only Vindman blurted out Ciaramella but he’s shaking like a leaf. He’s clearly the guilty one. Williams, on the other hand, it completely unfazed.


142 posted on 11/19/2019 8:00:07 AM PST by struggle
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 140 | View Replies]

To: Pilgrim's Progress

I cannot believe this @$$hat took an oath of loyalty to the USA. I wonder if he took it in Russian, Ukranian or English


143 posted on 11/19/2019 8:00:35 AM PST by smvoice (I WILL NOT WEAR THE RIBBON.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 136 | View Replies]

To: centurion316
You certainly may, fire away on Vindman. Do not insult the uniform.

Get off your high horse. It's one thing to criticize someone's post but you are in no position to control another man's speech.

I'm a veteran. No one here has denigrated THE uniform, just HIS uniform. It is being worn not in respect but in defiance of his commander in chief and oath of office. The only one disrespecting the uniform is Vindman and I'm proud of my fellow FReepers for calling him out on it.

144 posted on 11/19/2019 8:00:48 AM PST by pgyanke (Republicans get in trouble when not living up to their principles. Democrats... when they do.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 126 | View Replies]

To: smvoice

That’s true, and Vindman should have appeared in civilian clothes, his usual dress at the NSC. His appearance in uniform is clearly a part of the Democrat Party to advance a certain narrative. He is a willing participant in this charade and is demonstrating his political allegiances. My point is to insult Vindman and not the Army uniform that he is wearing.


145 posted on 11/19/2019 8:00:51 AM PST by centurion316
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 128 | View Replies]

To: fhayek

I’m sure that they’ll follow up during questioning.

They already have holes in Vindman’s testimony. It’s just a matter of time.


146 posted on 11/19/2019 8:01:25 AM PST by struggle
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 141 | View Replies]

To: centurion316

“I don’t know much about Hunter Biden” ?
Wow? Sure. As far as I am concerned that
is an admittance the so called investigation is a
colossal fraud!


147 posted on 11/19/2019 8:02:07 AM PST by Rock N Jones (1935)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 101 | View Replies]

To: shelterguy

Then quit insulting people wearing the uniform


148 posted on 11/19/2019 8:02:49 AM PST by centurion316
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 130 | View Replies]

To: shelterguy

Then quit insulting people wearing the uniform


149 posted on 11/19/2019 8:02:49 AM PST by centurion316
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 130 | View Replies]

To: fhayek

Is anybody watching vindman’s lawyer? He looks more nervous than Vindman. If his client doesn’t follow the script he, the lawyer, might have his ass in a sling too.


150 posted on 11/19/2019 8:03:06 AM PST by mark3681
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 141 | View Replies]

To: HombreSecreto

Lawyers who become politicians often do so because they suck at the practice of law. An experienced and competent trial lawyer would structure the Q & A along the lines that you suggest. In all fairness, however, an effective cross-examination takes time to develop, and 5 minutes, 30 minutes, and even 60 minutes may not be enough time to score points.


151 posted on 11/19/2019 8:03:26 AM PST by Labyrinthos
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 134 | View Replies]

To: struggle

Good. Nail the guy!


152 posted on 11/19/2019 8:03:45 AM PST by HombreSecreto (The life of a repo man is always intense)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 139 | View Replies]

To: centurion316

Please give it a rest.


153 posted on 11/19/2019 8:04:16 AM PST by pghoilman (Earth First. We'll drill the rest of the galaxy later.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 145 | View Replies]

To: Labyrinthos

It also helps to be allowed to challenge an answer in real time, not an hour later.


154 posted on 11/19/2019 8:04:42 AM PST by pnut22
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 151 | View Replies]

To: centurion316

Pretty clear now that LTC Vindman was the source for the Whistle-blower ...which would be a crime. Plus the LTC previously testified on oath that he didn’t know who the whistle-blower was.


155 posted on 11/19/2019 8:04:57 AM PST by CWW (Pray for God's Protection!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 149 | View Replies]

To: fhayek

Schiff rule: You can talk about it so long as it doesn’t reveal what a partisan coup this is under my guise.


156 posted on 11/19/2019 8:05:46 AM PST by Moonlighter
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 141 | View Replies]

To: pnut22

This guy thinks taking the picture was cool. You take the picture if you are the least important person in the group.


157 posted on 11/19/2019 8:05:51 AM PST by Vermont Lt
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 154 | View Replies]

To: struggle

https://twitter.com/Jim_Jordan/status/1196820957144526849

Rep. Jim Jordan
Verified account

@Jim_Jordan
45s45 seconds ago

Lt. Col. Vindman has repeatedly claimed that the President “demanded” investigations on the July 25th call.

We’ve all read the transcript of the call. There was no demand, no mention of aid, no quid pro quo.

(video clip at link)


158 posted on 11/19/2019 8:05:52 AM PST by maggief
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 146 | View Replies]

To: DOC44

WOW. A good interigater would have a field day with this guy.

Just have Nunes put a PRC 25 up on his desktop. Tell him he has an incoming call.


159 posted on 11/19/2019 8:05:52 AM PST by Mouton (The media is the enemy of the people.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 107 | View Replies]

To: freedom1st

Could almost anyone claim to be the whistleblower...and they think they have inside info..?


160 posted on 11/19/2019 8:06:15 AM PST by Leep (It's.. (W)all or nothing..!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 124 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 121-140141-160161-180 ... 781 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson