Jim Hines doesn't like the term, 'quid pro quo' because it's an old Latin term that confuses people.
He wants to change the narrative to 'extortion'.
Meet the Press Tweet
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-20, 21-29 next last
To: yesthatjallen
"Himes also said extortion doesn't require a "you give me this and I give you that" deal."
It most certainly does.
To: yesthatjallen
This is the kind of jackass who probably thinks you can file murder charges even if the alleged victim is alive and perfectly healthy.
3 posted on
11/10/2019 8:49:30 AM PST by
Alberta's Child
("In the time of chimpanzees I was a monkey.")
To: yesthatjallen
He is going to be arrested too. The more they immerse themselves into this false narrative the deeper into trouble they go.
5 posted on
11/10/2019 8:51:00 AM PST by
DarthVader
(Not by speeches & majority decisions will the great issues of the day be decided but by Blood & Iron)
To: yesthatjallen
These F’ers cling on and promote the language of the Shiffty parody as if it was what Trump had really said. OUTRAGEOUS LIARS!!
6 posted on
11/10/2019 8:52:29 AM PST by
McBuff
(To be, rather than to seem)
To: yesthatjallen
I wish somebody would explain that diplomacy is entirely quid pro quo, extortion, and bribery on a national rather than individual level.
To: yesthatjallen
and what we’re dealing with here is corruption, abuse of power
Well that part is correct. The problem for the Dems is those charges belong on them and not on the President.
8 posted on
11/10/2019 8:54:10 AM PST by
48th SPS Crusader
(I am an American. Not a Republican or a Democrat)
To: yesthatjallen
There is some truth to what he’s saying about using Latin, but the majority of Dems are not going to listen to him.
They don’t want to have to explain or breakdown why they want to impeach. They would even prefer using this sort of nebulous phrase, one that is not fully clear to the average citizen.
They don’t care what the term really implies.
According to them, the term now means what they want it to mean.
To: yesthatjallen
Its complicated so we need the Crowned Heads of government to interpret what is happening for us unwoke folks.
11 posted on
11/10/2019 8:54:56 AM PST by
GSWarrior
(I am a victim of racism every time I am called a racist because of my race.)
To: yesthatjallen
They want to move away from "quid pro quo" to "bribery" because "bribery" is specifically mentioned in the Constitution as impeachable ("Treason, Bribery, or other High Crimes and Misdemeanors").
To get there, they have to make the common uncommon; they have to turn the normal quid pro quo of foreign aid policy into criminal bribery.
-PJ
12 posted on
11/10/2019 8:55:22 AM PST by
Political Junkie Too
(Freedom of the press is the People's right to publish, not CNN's right to the 1st question.)
To: yesthatjallen
"If you mention extortion again, I'll have your legs broken."
13 posted on
11/10/2019 8:56:14 AM PST by
dfwgator
(Endut! Hoch Hech!)
To: yesthatjallen
Democrats. They are so immersed in the whole welfare concept, that they probably really DO think that money that we give to foreign governments should have absolutely
no strings attached. Foreign aid derives solely from the goodness of the hearts of the American taxpayer, and that we should not expect that the foreign country do anything in return that furthers American interests. Rooting out corrupt elements that pocket American money?? How can you be so obtuse??
What do they think a foreign policy is for?
14 posted on
11/10/2019 8:56:38 AM PST by
fhayek
To: yesthatjallen
The corruption here is the fact that Joe Biden used his position as Vice President to get his lowlife son a no-show $50K a month job in return for favors.
Nobody in the media seems to want to talk about that though, evidently were supposed to believe that Trump wanting it investigated is worse than the Bidens pay for play scheme.
15 posted on
11/10/2019 8:57:51 AM PST by
GaryCrow
To: yesthatjallen
16 posted on
11/10/2019 9:00:48 AM PST by
E. Pluribus Unum
(Democrats only believe in democracy when they win the election.)
To: yesthatjallen
Hes right. We should refer to Bidens actions as bribery.
To: yesthatjallen
Just say “ORANGE MAN BAD!” so average leftists can understand it.
20 posted on
11/10/2019 9:05:00 AM PST by
PGR88
To: yesthatjallen
All we are dealing with here are people who don’t think Trump should be President.
22 posted on
11/10/2019 9:12:14 AM PST by
bigbob
(Trust Trump. Trust the Plan.)
To: yesthatjallen
Quid pro quo. Another one bites the dust, just like “collusion.” So it’s off to the races with the next one.
To: yesthatjallen
How did giving Ukraine taxpayer money, that soetero wouldn’t give them so he could please Putin, endanger US national security?
24 posted on
11/10/2019 9:14:05 AM PST by
qaz123
To: yesthatjallen
Much of the relationships between nations would constitute extortion in the domestic context.
You would have to show me where in the statutes covering extortion that diplomatic exchanges were covered and made criminal.
26 posted on
11/10/2019 9:19:51 AM PST by
Jim Noble
(There is nothing racist in stating plainly what most people already know)
To: yesthatjallen
ex·tor·tion
/ikˈstôrSH(ə)n/
noun:
the practice of obtaining something, especially money, through force or threats.
Nope. Even in the worst far-left interpretation, what actually happened is nowhere near the definition of extortion.
27 posted on
11/10/2019 9:20:01 AM PST by
Pollster1
("Governments derive their just powers from the consent of the governed")
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-20, 21-29 next last
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson