Posted on 10/22/2019 11:12:51 AM PDT by JonPreston
A gay dude "married" to another dude would never get my vote. That alone would tell me he and I won't see eye to eye on anything.
I a better world, the only places you’d see a man “married” to another man would be in a mental asylum or a prison.
I agree. But at the end of the day, their gayness is not the problem. It is a symptom of the problem.
I remember a few decades ago there was this preacher on the christian cable network who’s face had been horribly disfigured in an accident or something. I could not watch the guy preach. At all. He was the poster child for “you’ve got a face for radio”.
That is, it may hat even have been his fault that his face had been disfigured, but it should have eliminated his pursuit of a video preaching career. Same thing with being homosexual and running for president.
White ones too!
Cant wait for some tongue action with his wife at convention trump might win the black vote. More than 400 electorial votes
Can people stop talking about their pee-pees for at least 5 Minutes?
Only change I would make to your pecking order is to put Mexicans at the bottom below blacks.
OR
Change Mexicans to Illegals
The fact is that U.S.- Born Mexicans dont get a lot of lovin from the PC culture.
I wouldn’t vote for him, and I’m pretty pale
They will nominate a straight white person, and put slutty drunk Kamala in the Veep slot to appease their black constituencies.
Sorry, but abnormal people can't. This is the same bunch who are trying to pass off as presidential timber a fake Indian, an Irishman who thinks he's a Mexican, a corrupt, life-long politician who is entering the throes of dementia and this nut bag who's married to a man. And did I mention they all want men to pee alongside of small kids in public toilets while allowing illegals full and complete access to free healthcare?
Where the F is the Republican party???
I hope he didn't pay them much. Getting to that finding should have taken them about an hour at most.
No one is even thinking how he is going to be able to deal with leaders from anti gay countries, like the whole Middle East, for starters. Is he going to bring his husband on state trips?
Maybe the study was done to determine if the letter D overcomes their normal, healthy revulsion to faggotry.
Surprise! Surprise! Don’t look now, but South Carolina is more like real America than it is like the Swamp.
“This is the same bunch who are trying to pass off as presidential timber a fake Indian, an Irishman who thinks he’s a Mexican, a corrupt, life-long politician who is entering the throes of dementia and this nut bag who’s married to a man. And did I mention they all want men to pee alongside of small kids in public toilets while allowing illegals full and complete access to free healthcare?”
Couldn’t have summed it up any better than that!
Blacks have different views on many matters than those of the rest of the democratic party. While there are plenty of black homosexuals, as a whole the black community looks down on homosexuals and they’re not going to be likely to vote for one. Blacks aren’t ideologically liberal in the contemporary definition of the word, their allegiance to the democratic party is more driven by the democrats support of a massive welfare state.
I would never vote for Buttigieg based on his extreme leftism anyway, but his open homosexuality would absolutely keep me from voting for him. It’s not the politically correct thing to say, but in my opinion homesexuality is a sign of the presence of mental issues that have no business being near the presidency.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.