Trump faces growing GOP revolt on Syria

TheHill.com ^ | 10/09/19 06:00 AM EDT | ALEXANDER BOLTON

[robowombat]

Trump faces growing GOP revolt on Syria BY ALEXANDER BOLTON - 10/09/19 06:00 AM EDT

Trump faces growing GOP revolt on Syria

Republicans are in a full-out revolt against President Trump over his decision to withdraw troops from northern Syria, a move broadly seen as putting the lives of Kurdish allies at risk.

The overwhelming opposition from GOP lawmakers is putting increasing pressure on Trump to reverse course. And it comes at a time when Democrats are moving full steam ahead with an impeachment inquiry.

Sen. Lindsey Graham (R-S.C.), one of Trump’s loudest congressional supporters, on Tuesday demanded a senators-only briefing on the Syria move, which he said betrayed the Kurds and would make it tougher for the U.S. to build alliances going forward.

“The President’s decision will have severe consequences for our strategic national interests and reduce American influence in the region while strengthening Turkey, Russia, and Iran,” Graham wrote in a letter also signed by Sen. Christopher Coons (D-Del.). “The decision also dramatically increases the threat to our Kurdish allies, who helped destroy ISIS’s territorial caliphate, and will impair our ability to build strategic alliances in the future.”

Trump’s decision, seen as enabling Turkey to go after Kurds in Syria, was lambasted by Trump loyalists such as Rep. Liz Cheney (Wyo.), the third-ranking House GOP leader, and Republicans who have differed with the president on policies, such as Sen. Mitt Romney (Utah).

Cheney called the decision a “catastrophic mistake” and Romney characterized it as a “betrayal” of Kurdish allies that would show “America is an unreliable ally.”

Sen. Ron Johnson (R-Wis.), one of Trump’s most ardent defenders in the Senate, said he agrees with the president that the United States should not be the world’s policeman but warned that “abandoning the Kurds” would send a “terrible signal to America’s allies and adversaries” and would be “unconscionable.

The broad-based backlash left some in the GOP hoping Trump would reverse himself, something Sen. Bill Cassidy (R-La.) on Tuesday raised as a possibility.

“I understand he’s reconsidering. I do not think we should abandon the Kurds,” he told a reporter for Politico.

Senate Republican sources said the Pentagon has warned Turkey not to advance into northern Syria, despite interpretations of Trump’s decision to pull back U.S. forces as a go-ahead signal.

Top Pentagon spokesman Jonathan Hoffman on Monday said the Defense Department has “made clear” that “we do not endorse a Turkish operation in Northern Syria.”

The following day, Hoffman disputed reports that Trump made his decision without consultating Defense Secretary Mark Esper and Chairman of the Joint Chiefs of Staff Mark Milley, adding that U.S. troops were repositioned in Syria to ensure their safety.

“Secretary Esper and Chairman Milley were consulted over the last several days by the President regarding the situation and efforts to protect U.S. forces in Northern Syria in the face of military action by Turkey,” Hoffman said in statement.

He said the Defense Department continues to hold the position that “establishing a safe zone in Northern Syria” is the best way to maintain stability.

“Unfortunately, Turkey has chosen to act unilaterally. As a result we have moved the U.S. forces in Northern Syria out of the path of potential Turkish incursion to ensure their safety,” Hoffman said. “We have made no changes to our force presence in Syria at this time.”

Trump, in a set of mixed messages conveyed via Twitter, threatened to retaliate against Turkey if the country goes too far. But he did not specify what kind of action would cross the line.

Expert panel says regime change in Iran is getting closer SPONSORED CONTENT Expert panel says regime change in Iran is getting closer

BY ORGANIZATION OF IRANIAN AMERICAN COMMUNITIES “If Turkey does anything that I, in my great and unmatched wisdom, consider to be off limits, I will totally destroy and obliterate the Economy of Turkey,” Trump tweeted Monday.

The flurry of events left lawmakers befuddled about Trump’s plan.

“I think there’s a sense of waiting to see what the administration is actually going to do,” said a Senate Republican aide who called the situation “clear as mud.”

GOP aides said Trump’s announcement caught Capitol Hill by surprise and appeared to be made off the cuff after a phone conversation with Turkish President Recep Tayyip Erdogan, who is now scheduled to visit the White House in mid-November.

Brett McGurk, a former member of Trump’s national security team, told NPR that the president’s sudden decision to withdraw from Syria appeared made “on a haphazard basis after a single call” and called it “almost unprecedented.”

Graham and Coons, in their letter to Senate leaders, raised concerns “that this was an abrupt decision taken in the face of reported opposition from military and diplomatic leaders.”

“We believe that it is imperative that the Department of Defense, State Department, and the Intelligence Community provide an all-members classified briefing on this decision as soon as possible,” they wrote.

But another one of Trump’s closest allies, Sen. Rand Paul (Ky.), defended the president’s action and criticized fellow Republicans for rebelling.

“They always want to stay at war. They think it’s the best answer,” Paul said of what he called the “neocon war caucus of the Senate.”

“President Trump recognizes what President Reagan recognized, unfortunately too late, in Beirut. Leaving 300 or 400 people in an area that are vulnerable could lead to catastrophe,” Paul said Monday on Fox News.

In the House, Democrats said they were looking at several options to push back against Trump’s latest foreign policy move, which caught leaders of both parties by surprise.

“Multiple committees are looking at possible legislative efforts to put the House on record against the president’s outrageous decision,” said a Democratic leadership aide.

While House Republicans have not sided with Democrats on many measures critical of Trump, it seemed possible that the Syria decision could be an exception.

The Senate voted 70-26 in February to advance a resolution authored by Senate Majority Leader Mitch McConnell (R-Ky.) expressing strong opposition to the precipitous withdrawal of troops from Syria or Afghanistan.

McConnell reminded Trump of that in a statement Monday, urging him “to exercise American leadership to keep our multinational coalition to defeat ISIS and prevent significant conflict between our NATO ally Turkey and our local Syrian counterterrorism partners,” referring to Kurdish forces.

A second Senate Republican aide said there could be language added to the annual National Defense Authorization Act to influence Trump’s Syria policy.

But a Republican spokeswoman for the Senate Armed Services Committee noted the bill is still under negotiation and declined to speculate on what might be included in the final version.

The House version of the legislation limits military spending until the secretary of Defense submits to the congressional committees a detailed report on the military mission to combat Islamic militants in Syria and Iraq.

The House bill also requires the secretaries of Defense and State to submit to Congress plans for providing assistance to vetted Syrian opposition forces.

Aside from the defense authorization bill, Congress could pass other measures, from ratcheting up sanctions on Syria to sanctioning foreign individuals who provide support to the Syrian government.

None of those bills, however, would reverse Trump’s decision on Syria.

But Graham on Tuesday endorsed the threat of sanctions against Turkey to safeguard against a military strike against Kurdish forces.

“If Turkey moves into northern Syria, sanctions from hell – by Congress – will follow. Wide, deep, and devastating sanctions,” he tweeted.

[rdcbn]

President Trump is doing the right thing here on many levels.

The Kurdish situation is very complex and there are many Kurdish factions that are communist and or terrorists backed by Iran

Here at home, the Presidents opposition is desperate to intervene in behalf of the Kurds which seems strange. Could it be that the Kurds know exactly what the Obama Administration was doing in its support of ISIS and why they were doing it. The Kurds are also capable of exposing that ISIS is just another name for al Qaeda, something that many in Washington would like keep quiet

Bottom line, the entire Obama Arab Spring was one of the dirtiest and most destructive acts of the Obama era and their support of ISIS is de facto providing aid and comfort to al Qaeda.

The Kurds are able to connect the dots on this

Intervening in military action by a fellow NATO member is serious business and American troops would inevitably come into conflict with those from Turkey. American troops engaged in acts of war with Turkey would be a huge problem

The American troops are in Syria as much to stabilize a very unstable situation and as a trip wire to deter Turkish military invasion of Syria. If the Turks invade and come into conflict with our troops we would be forced to intervene by circumstance beyond our control and on the terms of the opposition

This is critical to understand - America is in no position to engage Turkey in a serious military adventure on Turkey’s home court because we simply do not have the assets to do so in the region. To try would be a military disaster in the short term and by the time we mobilized Turkey would be dug in in Syria much the same way Saddam was in Kuwait in 1990.

President Trump has responded brilliantly and has not taken the bait offered by those who wish to American troops involved in another insane operation in the Middle East.

Instead he has kicked the stool out from under the status quo of a grinding and festering stalemate of constant low intensity conflict and is in a commanding position to put together and lead an international coalition to stabilize the situation and help rebuild the war devastated region and put it on a path to peace and recovery . None of which is going to happen in the current status quo

[allwrong57]

We don’t have an ally in the middle east, other than Israel, which most of the Democrats want to eliminate from existence.

[piasa]

https://www.breitbart.com/national-security/2015/09/25/world-view-suspicions-grow-that-pkk-doing-russias-bidding-in-bombing-turkey-pipelines/

[nathanbedford]

In forming an opinion about the president withdrawing the troops from Syria, there are several reflexes which seem to give rise to opinions:

1. Cheeto Jesus can do no wrong.

2. Orange Man bad can do no right.

3. American involvement in foreign conflicts is per se wrong and must always be opposed.

4. America has a moral duty to be policeman of the world.

5. Whatever harms Israel should be supported.

6. Whatever helps Israel should be supported.

Judging from other threads, the majority here will choose reflex position 1 and cite a version of 2 in support.

I am not convinced either way but I will observe that the record seems clear that the president simply did not cultivate support within his own party and even among Democrats before announcing. Not necessarily the most prudent move when facing a probable impeachment and entirely unnecessary.

[nathanbedford]

Correction: many will cite a version of 3 in support.

[jmaroneps37]

Is “Alexander” John Bolton’s real first name or his pen name?

[Flick Lives]

Tell Congress to put up or shut up. Vote a declaration of war on Turkey. That’s the responsibility of Congress. But, no. They have abdicated responsibility for most everything including passing budgets. The bastards all want power without accountability.

[mjp]

big problems get worse if you ignore them or run away from them

[Pearls Before Swine]

Thanks. I missed this in my search.

Some other articles showed up from within the past few months—definitely this year—repeating the old status of 50 to 70 B61s at Incirlik, and mentioning the policy of “shared access” to nukes with NATO partners. (Whatever “shared” means in this context.)

[Sacajaweau]

Or Korea...

IIRC, we only have a couple hundred troops in Syria. I'd pull them out, too.

Both Turkey and the Kurds have massive armies and IMO, this is more like a civil war.

[Logical me]

Trump was wrong.

[wiseprince]

So Trump is allowed to enter any country any time but is not allowed to leave? Who is in control of the armed forces? It doesn’t seems like it’s the elected leader. If Congress wants to be in the war then vote to authorize Trump to fight the war and then don’t undermine him when you think he’s too tough

[Mariner]

Eff ‘em.

All of ‘em.

[Bloody Sam Roberts]

Smells like a set up. A Deep State/CIA setup.

[RitchieAprile]

seriously doubt official DoD would comment on location of *any* special weapons.

[wiseprince]

It’s frustrating that Trump isn’t trying to make the argument that Congress needs to vote for this war if they want him to stay. They just tell and scream and never take any actual responsibility. I want to see who is willing to vote for this war.

[wiseprince]

I wish Trump would point that out. He’s giving them the field on this one

[Pearls Before Swine]

Re DoD no comment: That would be a hoped-for and sensible policy. But, someone commented about the location of those B61’s at Incirlik in the past. Of course, there was an 8-year Obama presidency during which security concerns were seemingly disregarded on many occasions.

[MNJohnnie]

No surprise the Lobby for Perpetual War is in hysterics that Trump is taking steps to return US National Policy to it proper form and ending the 30 year mistake in Bushy Globalism pushed by the last 4 US Presidents.

[rrrod]

Yes Turkey is attacking. Not sure how this will work out but Trump inviting Erogan to the WH is a mistake IMO. We’ll see.