p
Lies, lies, lies!
Hasn’t the Supreme Court basically ruled that the press has full license to smear public figures without being held responsible, on the basis that they are exercising their first amendment rights?
I wonder if the Supremes might revisit that opinion, now that it is one of their own being smeared.
Personally, I think the press should be held fully accountable for publishing and spreading lies.
Not only does she not recall the specific party at issue, she doesn’t recall “any others like it.” Moreover, Keyser maintains this recollection in spite of a determined effort by old friends to get her to change her testimony — a pressure campaign that Keyser admirably resisted.
***********************************************************
I made a small contribution to the Gofundme campaign for Keyser who has paid a high price for her integrity.
https://www.gofundme.com/f/help-leland-keyser
This is NOT a mistake. We might not like the New York Times - but real journalists work there - and they know better. This misdirection - this lie - this smear - was done on purpose.
Why have we not heard from Feinstein?
He’s getting Re-Borked
I’m really disappointed that an accused serial homosexual pedophile and purported child sex trafficker like Max Stier could make these sleazy insinuations against our President...
I posted this earlier on another thread about this.
It bears repeating.
I hate to be crude but given the details of this story it needs to be asked:
For this to have been true, just how well hung is Justice Kavanaugh? According to the story, he drops trousers, somebody grabs his johnson and places it in a girls hand.
Does anybody but me see an issue with the logistics of that? Unless the girl was standing chest to chest with Justice Kavanaugh what is described is simply impossible unless he is literally, LITERALLY hung like a water hose.
I’ve been in my share of athletic locker rooms and shower facilities when I was a triathlete. I’ve seen several hundred naked men in such circumstances. I have never seen any man with a tally-wacker long enough have someone do that.
This literally cannot be true unless the judge is in the Guinness Book of Records.
This story is simply a lie.
The campaign of intimidation.
For as long as the Democrat Thug Party isn’t pushed back, it will continue to bully.
Ginzberg is about to check out, they need to try to level the field or its a Trump win that will last for a century
A successful impeachment of Kavanaugh would presage a civil war in the same fashion as an impeachment of Trump.
Hence these new charges.
I'm guessing that their fallback plan is that if they can't stop Trump from replacing Ginsburg with a conservative, they will try to remove a conservative that can be replaced with a liberal when the Democrat beats Trump in 2020.
I don't think Trump will lose, but the Democrats would be negligent in their wickedness if they didn't try to set the table that way, just in case something unexpected happens.
Short of that, they are laying the foundation for rejecting a future nominee like Amy Coney Barrett. She's not a sexual predator -- are they going to use their manufactured charges against Kavanaugh as a litmus test to question future candidates?
Maybe Democrats will use this to ask future Trump nominees if they have any concerns working with Kavanaugh after everything "we've learned" about him, and make it a disqualifier if they say they believe him over his accusers.
They will set up strawman arguments about how the nominee doesn't support "women's rights" because they don't believe the charges against Kavanaugh, are willing to work alongside Kavanaugh, or worst-case, refuse to condemn Kavanaugh's "known behaviors."
The Kavanaugh charges will be the blunt weapon that Democrats will use to disqualify any conservative woman that President Trump nominates. Democrats just needed to refresh the charges for public consumption before they can start, now that Ginsburg's end appears imminent.
-PJ
... yet again another hi-tech lynching ...
It’s pretty obvious by now that if the Democrats (God forbid) ever get back in control of both Houses and POTUS they are gonna engineer another accusation and use that as an excuse to impeach Kavanaugh.
It is ALL (from the beginning to now) an agenda to put an asterisk on Bret’s name, as a way to pre-judge any SCOTUS decision he might make on a case about abortion, and to smear any such decision he does make as prejudiced by his “bad” past.
Destroy his character to defame his decisions - which in their view they have done with Thomas.
Shameful media.