Posted on 07/28/2019 6:02:04 AM PDT by Kaslin
In an imaginary “ranking” of Christian topics that elicit the most fervent discussions, Jesus Christ is No. 1. But near the top is the Shroud of Turin — believed by millions of Christians to be the authentic burial cloth of Jesus. This “ranking” was inspired by you — Townhall readers who wrote over 500 impassioned comments in response to my July 21 piece, “Shroud of Turin: New Test Concludes 1988 ‘Medieval Hoax’ Dating Was a Fraud.”
I purposely read all your comments to gain insight into my role as an adviser and fundraiser for a groundbreaking exhibition about the Shroud of Turin at the Museum of the Bible in Washington D.C. This spectacular museum, among the largest and highest rated in the city, is located only three blocks from the Capitol. And just prior to the January 20, 2021, presidential inauguration is when this high-tech Shroud exhibit is scheduled to open.
Threaded throughout hundreds of your responses about all aspects of the Shroud was one overarching theme summarized by these three comments:
“Anyone who requires physical evidence to underpin their faith doesn’t understand the concept of faith.”
“JESUS CHRIST died for all. HE is what is important. Making such a fuss about this piece of cloth is a distraction from HIS work of SALVATION.”
“I respectfully submit that the only ‘relic’ which really matters is the one which was left us on that first Easter morning: The tomb is empty! He is Risen! He is Risen indeed! Alleluia!”
Of course, “He is Risen” is also the foundation of my Christian faith, (made slightly more complicated by having been born Jewish). But I feel compelled to discuss and explore the comment that reads in part, “…such a fuss about this piece of cloth...”
And my response is simple: The Shroud of Turin exists because HE exists. An answer that echoes what God said to Moses, “I Am Who I Am. Say this to the people of Israel: I Am has sent me to you” (Exodus 3:14).
Thus, the existence of the Shroud of Turin raises two questions that I will attempt to address: First, what exactly is the Shroud? And second, a deeper dive into “Why does the cloth exist?”
The Shroud of Turin is a 14.5-by-3.5-foot linen cloth with a linear front to back mirror image of a crucified man. The Shroud has the distinction of being the most studied artifact in the world, yet the cloth’s numerous mysteries remained unexplained by modern science.
At this moment the Shroud lies in a fireproof box in the Cathedral of St. John the Baptist in Turin, Italy, as it has continuously since 1578. (But secretly relocated between 1939 and 1946 when Italian authorities feared Hitler was seeking possession.)
Dating the Shroud has been controversial and the subject of my July 21 piece.
Among Shroud historians, there is no dispute that in 1352, over 200 years before the Shroud was housed in Turin, Geoffrey DeCharney displayed the cloth in Lirey, France marking the beginning of the Shroud’s documented "modern" dating.
There is also much circumstantial Shroud evidence through art, artifacts, and coins that pre-dates 1352. Moreover, scientifically verified botanical evidence found on the cloth in the form of pollen, dust, flowers, and even the weave and type of linen traces the Shroud back to first-century Jerusalem.
The cloth with its mysterious properties has survived wars, invasions and the ravages of time including numerous fires — most recently in 1997 at its home cathedral in Turin.
Most harrowing was the 1532 fire in Chambéry, France. Miraculously the entire cloth was not destroyed but left those distinctive linear markings along both sides of the Shroud that we see today. Hard to imagine, but the linen cloth was stored in a silver box, folded in 48 layers, when drops of molten silver burned through the cloth’s outer folded edges.
The point is, against all the odds, the Shroud exists. And, as stated earlier, because He exists. There is also a significant Bible-based reason found in the Gospel of John known as “Doubting Thomas” (John 20:24-31).
But first, a “guest” who will explain this passage needs a proper introduction:
It turns out that the many Townhall readers who commented about not needing the Shroud’s “physical evidence to underpin their faith,” represent a large swath of Christian believers. I learned this when asking Russ Breault— my fellow Shroud exhibit team colleague, and a world-renowned Shroud expert and speaker — if he had experienced similar attitudes after over 30 years of hosting his popular “Shroud Encounters” to sell-out crowds.
Breault replied:
“I get that statement all the time! When someone says, ‘I don't need the Shroud for my faith,’ I usually say, ‘That is fantastic! But that doesn't mean the Shroud was not meant for someone else.’ ”
Breault continued: “In the Doubting Thomas story, Jesus pronounced a blessing on those who ‘believe yet have not seen,’ but Jesus did not condemn Thomas for his unbelief. In fact, a week after the Resurrection, Jesus appeared a second time, and the first person he spoke to was Thomas, who was not there to witness Jesus’ first appearance. Jesus then quotes Thomas' words back to him, ‘Thomas, thrust your hand into my side and place your fingers into my nail wounds and be not faithless but believe.’
At this point, Thomas — forever known as "Doubting Thomas" — makes the strongest profession of faith in the New Testament saying, "My Lord and my God." Then Jesus pronounced a blessing on those who can believe without seeing. So we are blessed if we can believe without seeing, but we are not cursed if we can't get there without some additional evidence.
Therefore, perhaps the Shroud is a silent witness to the world offering all of humanity the same opportunity Jesus gave to Thomas. In some proverbial sense by looking at the Shroud, we too can thrust our hand into His side and place our fingers into His nail wound and find our faith in the process.”
Thank you, Russ! And now my final thoughts for Townhall commenters.
If blessed with great faith, you are free to ignore or downplay the image on the Shroud showing Christ’s great suffering and victory over death. Yet, take comfort in knowing that the Shroud is there to supplement or reinforce the faith of others while potentially witnessing to the ever-increasing number of Doubting Thomases found throughout the world.
In the end, I believe that the Shroud exists as proof of God’s greatest gift to mankind —the Lord Jesus Christ — who lives and reigns forever and ever. Alleluia!
(Now, let the comments begin!)
Given the things Jesus said to His disciples, I strongly suspect you are grasping at straws here.
Yeah, right. The time you spend doing that takes you from Christ’s directive to YOU: “Go ye therefore and teach all nations, Baptizing them in the name of the Father, Son, and Holy Spirit”. That a lot different than saying this to a stranger: “Hey look! I have Jesus’ drinking cup”.
Authenticity of the Shroud is pretty much an “is” or “isn’t” thing. In my mind, where one falls is a matter of faith. “Proving” authenticity defies faith. And faith is simply defined in Hebrews 11:1;
“Now faith is the substance of things hoped for, the evidence of things not seen”.
That's why I refuse to have my photo taken. I can't stand having the camera lens pressed down flush against my face.
Has the Catholic Church ever officially recognized the shroud as an official relic of Jesus Christ?
Jimmy Swaggart said it is fake. That is good enough for me. I can now say with confidence that it is real.
God has acted throughout history with outward signs, physical events, and supernatural miracles.
To say that acknowledging Christ’s physical presence as a fact of history is somehow opposed to having faith in Christ, is a false dichotomy.
Bookmark
There are more things in heaven and Earth, Horatio, / Than are dreamt of in your philosophy [science].
—Hamlet
Reference please. When, where?
Only Catholics seem to think so. Not much about that organization has Biblical foundations.
“If it is real, it would make no difference whatsoever.”
You’re saying facts don’t matter. Seriously, that’s what you’re saying. If the shroud is real, then that means there is physical proof of the life, death and resurrection of Christ. How can that possibly not matter?
“Salvation comes ONLY through Faith in Christ as the Savior by Gift of the Holy Spirit. Nothing else matters. Nothing.”
Salvation comes through Grace. Grace comes through faith and Christ’s works in us. It’s easier for a man who has no faith to come to faith if he has reasons for faith. Facts are reasons FOR faith.
“There is nothing anywhere in Scripture that tells us to revere artifacts.”
You might want to read Acts 19:12. You also might want to ask yourself why someone like Spurgeon could write “This ark was the object of great reverence and very fitly so...” about the Ark of the Covenant. https://www.spurgeongems.org/vols25-27/chs1621.pdf
“There is, on the other hand, Scripture that tells us to reject any and all artifact worship.”
No one is worshiping the shroud. The scriptures also tell us not to lie. Don’t do it.
“Yeah, right. The time you spend doing that...”
Excuse me, doing what?
“Follow your relics and lying wonders and Ill take Christ.”
I have no lying wonders. And I don’t think you’ve taken Christ if you’re going to falsely claim someone has lying wonders.
“Hope it works out for you like you think it will.”
Christ never fails. People do. You have. Your example will teach, however.
“Given the things Jesus said to His disciples, I strongly suspect you are grasping at straws here.”
It was a simple question. Can you answer it? “If Christ came to you and left something behind from His crucifixion, would you treasure it or not?”
If you honestly expect me to believe for a single second that you would treasure something left behind by your parents, or a best friend, or your spouse, but not treasure something given to you by your God in the flesh, then you really are blind to reality.
“To say that acknowledging Christ’s physical presence as a fact of history is somehow opposed to having faith in Christ, is a false dichotomy.”
Absolutely correct!
And there we get to the crux of the matter. "The Catholics (spit!) have it, therefore it's bad."
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.