https://www.politico.com/staff/quint-forgey
Posted on 07/19/2019 3:56:23 AM PDT by MarvinStinson
TRUMP TURNS ON MAGA
This is Drudge's top, giantsize headline at 6:55 this morning.
The article it leads to never says that.
===========================================
Keep in mind...falsifying official documents is the preferred criminal method to cover-up larger crimes.
================================================
SOURCE: UK Daily Mail ^ | July 18, 2019 | Ross Ibbetson / FR Posted by C19fan
An incendiary photo purports to show Donald Trump's sworn enemy Ilhan Omar with two of her husbands - one allegedly her brother - at the same event. Trump caused uproar yesterday when he repeated the suggestion that the Democrat Congresswoman had married her own brother. The explosive rumor first appeared during her election campaign in 2016 and prompted a furious response with Omar calling it an Islamophobic slur. However, her conjugal arrangements are baffling in large part because she has failed to fully explain an apparent overlap in her unions to Ahmed Abdisalan Hirsi (her first and current husband) and Ahmed Nur Said Elmi (her second and ex-husband). (Excerpt) Read more at dailymail.co.uk ...
======================================
Citizenship Can Be Revoked For Lying on Applications / Vanity FR Posted on 7/17/2019 by TigerClaws
If it can be proven Illhan Omar lied applying for citizenship, she can be deported back to Somalia. Her project in improving her home country can then begin. For those unfamiliar with the facts, she allegedly used a sham marriage to a man who was, in fact, her brother to become a citizen here.
Law sources: Consequences of Providing False Testimony During Naturalization Interview
If you knowingly and intentionally provide false information (orally) during the naturalization interview and testing process--or if USCIS discovers that you falsely testified in order to gain immigration benefits in the past--you can expect your citizenship application to be denied. Or, if the lie is discovered later, USCIS can revoke (take away) a person's citizenship.
The naturalization interview is held "under oath," meaning that right from the start, you raise your right hand and swear to tell the truth. The immigration laws specifically say that, "No person shall be regarded as, or found to be, a person of good moral character who, during the period for which good moral character is required to be established [has] given false testimony for the purpose of obtaining any [immigration benefits]." (See the Immigration and Nationality Act (I.N.A.) Section 101(f)(6).)
As you probably know, receiving U.S. citizenship via the process of naturalization requires proving good moral character.
Depending on what a person lied about and the implications for their immigration status, there could also be further consequences, including being placed in removal proceedings and ultimately deported from the United States. For example, if a man was to lie during the naturalization interview and say that he was still married to the woman who helped get him a green card--and the fact that he was actually divorced was not only discovered, but led to a finding that the entire marriage had been a fraud--removal would be the likely consequence.
https://www.alllaw.com/articles/nolo/us-immigration/denial-citizenship-lies-false-statements-naturalization-applications.html
===============================================
REFERENCE--Falsifying Government Documents. involves altering, changing, or modifying a document for the purpose of deception.......can also involve forgery and/or passing copies of false documents. Falsifying documents is usually done in connection with broader criminal aims, such as extortion, government fraud, tax evasion, money laundering, financing terrorism........
Types of documents commonly falsified may include:
◾Tax returns and income statements
◾Personal checks
◾Bank account records
◾Business record keeping books
◾Immigration documents (such as visas, passports, etc.)
◾Identification cards and birth certificates
Many different types of acts can be considered as falsifying a document, including:
◾Altering or misrepresenting factual information such as prices or monetary amounts
◾Stating false information when requested to provide truthful statements
◾Forging a signature
◾Using official letterheads without authorization
◾Concealing assets or property WRT obtaining federal/state grants))
◾Knowingly using or distributing a fake document
A person can only be held criminally liable if they are deliberately acting with the intention of deceiving or defrauding another party.
Falsifying documents is a very serious offense and is generally classified as a felony. This means that a person charged with falsifying documents may be subject to the following legal penalties:
◾Having to pay a monetary fine
◾Incarceration in a prison facility
Depending on the gravity of the offense, as well as individual state laws, falsifying documents can result in a prison sentence of 5-10 years. Also, if government documents or authorities were involved, the legal penalties may be more severe. ..... legal penalties may increase with repeat offenses.
The penalty for falsifying government documents is outlined in the Crimes Act of 1958.
drudge is the America Online of news aggregation sites - strictly an early 90’s thing with no relevance to the modern world.
Drudge is a homo-fruit. Nothing to see there anymore.
Who is Drudge? And why should I care what they says?
The f’n mainstream media doing their best to separate MAGA from the Trumpster. Little do they know there is no way Trump will lose any support from his base. I wish he wouldnt listen to Ivanka, she;s a lib at heart.
Drudge is a fudge packing lefty. Have nothing to do with him. He is another enemy of the Republic.
Easy fix. Don’t go to the Fudge Report.
I would really like to know what the heck happened to Drudge.
There’s a story that needs telling.
https://www.politico.com/staff/quint-forgey
You state:
She is here fraudulently.. that is yet to be proven.
You site UK Daily Mail: ...”allegedly” her brother....
Then you site another FR post that states: If it can be proven Illhan Omar lied applying for citizenship.. and then list all the laws, penalties etc if you falsify government citizenship documents..
Should have started out with Bombshell, Shocking, Earth Rattling etc.
She’s a POS no doubt but you can’t “send her back” legally without proven evidence. Until that’s proven, the time tested “If you hate America so much LEAVE” works better.
I guess his point is that Trump ‘regrets’ the “send her back” chant.
I don’t know if I can speak for others here, but I’m not bothered a bit by either the chant, or Trump’s later reaction to it. Trump does have a country to run, I do not, and there’s a big difference between saying that perhaps the chant went a bit over the top, versus someone like McCain saying on Meet the Press, or something like it “He’ll make a fine president” when referring to Obama in 2008, just before the election.
I agree.
Drudge still has a decent site.
No huge way-out-front stories recently like he did way back when, but I still read every day.
Drudge has become an imitation of the fifth-column leftist Yahoo News.
I have noticed their articles are not updated daily. Some lean left and some go to sites that require you to join the site. Thank God for Free Republic!
Same here. It's not a conscious decision. The site just isn't important to me. Never was.
I’m using The Liberty Daily much more than Drudge.
It’s not a conscious decision.
The Derp State must have something on him, he turned years ago. I wonder what they have?
I saw that.
I don’t like and don’t understand that President Trump had any problem with the chant to send that evil women back. Didn’t he (properly) essentially start it? It’s not like him to back away from something like that. Especially when the subject is a pro terrorist, anti Israel worm.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.