Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


1 posted on 07/08/2019 8:36:06 PM PDT by yesthatjallen
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies ]


To: yesthatjallen
Like Nike says: "Just do it!"
2 posted on 07/08/2019 8:40:21 PM PDT by lightman (Byzantine Troparia: The "praise choruses" of antiquity.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: yesthatjallen

3 posted on 07/08/2019 8:41:04 PM PDT by GraceG ("If I post an AWESOME MEME, STEAL IT! JUST RE-POST IT IN TWO PLACES PLEASE")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: yesthatjallen

Good. Barr Should not tell the Associated Press anything about his legal strategy on this matter.


4 posted on 07/08/2019 8:42:25 PM PDT by nwrep
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: yesthatjallen

This Bill Barr really does suck at being a Deep Stater that some freepers swore up and down that is exactly how he would be. And they still think he is a Deep State rat.


5 posted on 07/08/2019 8:45:08 PM PDT by Trump.Deplorable
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: yesthatjallen

If the census doesn’t care whether I’m a citizen, then why should I care to answer? Waste of my time.


11 posted on 07/08/2019 9:07:54 PM PDT by kevao (BIBLICAL JESUS: Give your money to the poor. SOCIALIST JESUS: Give your neighbor's money to the poor)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: yesthatjallen
...That move has fueled speculation that career DOJ lawyers refused to provide another rationale behind the citizenship question after repeatedly citing the Voting Rights Act in court or that officials feared they would no longer be viewed as trustworthy by judges presiding over the cases...

Or how about the fact that the original team were deep state swamp rats who deliberately failed their assigned task.

They are being replaced by hopefully loyal lawyers who know how the read the road map that Roberts gave the administration.

12 posted on 07/08/2019 9:11:18 PM PDT by CurlyDave
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Whenifhow; null and void; aragorn; EnigmaticAnomaly; kalee; Kale; 2ndDivisionVet; azishot; ...

P


14 posted on 07/08/2019 9:55:42 PM PDT by bitt (US intel is there to protect the safety and security of Americans. It is not a political tool.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: yesthatjallen

SCOTUS flubbed this one plain as day.

A reputation-sullying decision, a “Supreme Court” that isn’t familiar enough with the Constitution to have noticed the 14th requires knowledge of citizenship.


15 posted on 07/08/2019 10:33:43 PM PDT by thoughtomator (The Clinton Coup attempt was a worse attack on the USA than was 9/11)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: yesthatjallen
Census-Citizenship1790-2020-Table
17 posted on 07/08/2019 10:39:10 PM PDT by Hostage (Article V)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: yesthatjallen

If the Democrats and Liberals are vehemently against it, you can be SURE that the reason is because they know it will effect their balance of power in Congress! Why don’t they ask the American voters if we want it put back in?


18 posted on 07/08/2019 10:43:59 PM PDT by boatbums (semper reformanda secundum verbum dei)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: yesthatjallen; conservative98

I Love that man. Bill Barr TOTALLY ROCKS.


20 posted on 07/08/2019 10:57:24 PM PDT by TianaHighrider (God bless our men with the bravery to be men.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: yesthatjallen
Ask them who their favorite football players are. If they list a bunch of soccer players, they don’t get counted.

More than one way to skin that cat.

22 posted on 07/08/2019 11:56:53 PM PDT by noiseman (The only thing necessary for the triumph of evil is for good men to do nothing.`)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: yesthatjallen
...though the Supreme Court ruled against its inclusion last month.

More totally incorrect armchair legal analysis from the media. The Supreme Court ruling did nothing of the sort. In fact it ruled that there was nothing inherently unconstitutional about a citizenship status question, they also struck down most of the plaintiff's other objections based on New York State privacy and Civil Rights laws. The only section they ruled against the government on was the judicial oversight portion where they said the Government had failed to provide sufficient explanation to the lower court regarding the administrative reasoning for adding the question back and kicked it back to the lower court to give the Government a chance to respond.

24 posted on 07/09/2019 3:17:27 AM PDT by apillar
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: yesthatjallen
"The DOJ also announced late Sunday that it was pulling its entire legal team for the citizenship question off the case, and replacing them with other government lawyers."

"YOU'RE FIRED".

26 posted on 07/09/2019 4:51:54 AM PDT by Wonder Warthog (The Hog of Steel and NRA Life Member)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: yesthatjallen

Typical of a big government, total waste of time money and resources. The question is not only reasonable given the tens of millions of illegals infesting the country, but absolutely necessary.


28 posted on 07/09/2019 5:38:24 AM PDT by 1Old Pro
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: yesthatjallen

still haven’t seen the statute that says a reason is needed...
has anyone else ?


29 posted on 07/09/2019 6:31:14 AM PDT by stylin19a (2016 - Best.Election.Of.All.Times.Ever.In.The.History.Of.Ever)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: yesthatjallen
Opponents of the question argued that its inclusion on the census would lead to an inaccurate count of the population, as ILLEGALimmigrants might be discouraged from participating, and might lead to Republicans demanding representative apportionment based on US citizenship which will cause blue states to lose representatives.

There, fixed it.

35 posted on 07/09/2019 8:52:13 AM PDT by Blood of Tyrants (Where does it say in the Constitution anyone is entitled to the property another has labored for?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson