Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Psychology Today: People Refusing To Date Transgenders Is ‘Dehumanizing’
Daily Wire ^ | June 18, 2019 | Paul Bois

Posted on 06/19/2019 9:03:50 AM PDT by Malone LaVeigh

If you are a heterosexual cisgendered person who only wishes to date heterosexual cisgendered people, then shame on you for dehumanizing transgenders and the non-binary, according to a recent article published in Psychology Today.

(Excerpt) Read more at dailywire.com ...


TOPICS: Culture/Society; News/Current Events
KEYWORDS: bloggers; homosexualagenda; mgtow; redpill; sjw; transgender
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-6061-80 ... 141-159 next last
To: Malone LaVeigh

“Why won’t men date me?”

“Well, for starters, you have a penis.”


21 posted on 06/19/2019 9:14:01 AM PDT by bk1000 (I stand with Trump)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Malone LaVeigh

Trying to modify your body into something you weren’t born as, is what is “Dehumanizing”


22 posted on 06/19/2019 9:14:33 AM PDT by DannyTN
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Dilbert San Diego

I guess I will be going with you! I know what transgender means but I actually had to look up the meaning of cisgender! As to the 50 other gender identities, I have no idea.


23 posted on 06/19/2019 9:14:47 AM PDT by Maine Mariner
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 8 | View Replies]

To: Malone LaVeigh

any one who is transgender and has sex with someone with out informing them of there situation is guilty of rape. o a jury I would be very lenient in that situation of some one guilty of killing there molester.


24 posted on 06/19/2019 9:14:57 AM PDT by PCPOET7
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Malone LaVeigh

I perused my first copy of Psychology Today in the early 70’s and it was full of shit even back then.


25 posted on 06/19/2019 9:14:58 AM PDT by SpaceBar
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Malone LaVeigh

Not interested in associating with insane people.

Not sorry either.


26 posted on 06/19/2019 9:15:19 AM PDT by chris37 (Monday, March 25 2019 is Maga Day!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Malone LaVeigh

Gee, dating ads (as far as I know, I’m long married) STILL are fine with stating racial preferences ... SWF (Single White Female), DBM (Divorced Black Male) etc. You would think someone would raise a stink about that first. One thing worse than not being asked out on a date is being asked out by someone fulfilling an obligation, and cannot disguise the fact.


27 posted on 06/19/2019 9:16:28 AM PDT by Dr. Sivana
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Malone LaVeigh

Maybe the government should regulate dating behavior. Set quotas on how many deviants you have to date. Earn a free waffle iron if you meet the quota. Go to re-education camp if you don’t.


28 posted on 06/19/2019 9:16:58 AM PDT by IronJack
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Malone LaVeigh

“Crazy Psychobabble Today”


29 posted on 06/19/2019 9:17:14 AM PDT by Zathras
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Malone LaVeigh

Why would a normal person want to date someone of the same sex ?


30 posted on 06/19/2019 9:17:27 AM PDT by libh8er
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: DeFault User

Paul has to be a tranny fag.


31 posted on 06/19/2019 9:17:47 AM PDT by Rebelbase
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 12 | View Replies]

To: Malone LaVeigh

They’re escalating from “Bake That Cake!” to “Suck My ****!”


32 posted on 06/19/2019 9:18:42 AM PDT by Boogieman
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Malone LaVeigh

Psychology today is a rag. Any magazine that would print an article making such a statement is not worth reading. Are Psychologists queer too? It seems that somebody on the editorial staff is to let this be printed. Whew, I never thought I would see something like this being said. Somebody is really twisted.


33 posted on 06/19/2019 9:18:53 AM PDT by maxwellsmart_agent
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Malone LaVeigh

BELIEVING you’re “transgendered” is ‘Dehumanizing’!!!


34 posted on 06/19/2019 9:19:07 AM PDT by G Larry (There is no great virtue in bargaining with the Devil)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Malone LaVeigh
I'd like to see them defend the designation dehumanizing. There is nothing in their comments that indicate that they consider trannies "not human." They simply consider them "not women" or "not men." Using the word dehumanizing is merely a scare/shame tactic, and wildly hyperbolic.
35 posted on 06/19/2019 9:19:14 AM PDT by A_perfect_lady ( Political correctness forbids discussing any negative outcomes of Left-wing ideology. -PMcL)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Malone LaVeigh

They’re now going to tell me who I can and can’t date?


36 posted on 06/19/2019 9:19:40 AM PDT by Tzimisce
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Malone LaVeigh
If you are a heterosexual cisgendered person who only wishes to date heterosexual cisgendered people, then shame on you for dehumanizing transgenders and the non-binary, according to a recent article published in Psychology Today.

Go play in your own insanity. Leave me alone.

37 posted on 06/19/2019 9:20:22 AM PDT by IYAS9YAS (There are two kinds of people: Those who can extrapolate from incomplete data.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Malone LaVeigh

Guess that makes me practically a nazi then, because not only (if I wasn’t married anyway) wouldn’t I date a trannie, I don’t care to date out of my race. It’s my preference, just like some have a preference for tall blue-eyed blondes. Isn’t that brunette discrimination? After all, those attributes are immutable too. What next, it will be politically incorrect if people won’t “date” homosexuals?


38 posted on 06/19/2019 9:21:08 AM PDT by mrsmel (I wonÂ’t be reconstructed and I do not give a damn)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Dilbert San Diego

That wouldn’t be learning anyway, it would be indoctrination, because there are only two sexes (not “genders”, as the left has tried to amend it).


39 posted on 06/19/2019 9:22:26 AM PDT by mrsmel (I wonÂ’t be reconstructed and I do not give a damn)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 8 | View Replies]

To: Army Air Corps

If I date women with the ultimate goal of marrying one of them and having children then the biologically incompatible transgenders are out of consideration.


40 posted on 06/19/2019 9:22:45 AM PDT by reg45 (Barack 0bama: Gone but not forgiven.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 15 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-6061-80 ... 141-159 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson