Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Oregon set to change the way it awards Electoral College votes [COMPACT]
The Oregonian ^ | June 6, 2019 | Chris Lehman

Posted on 06/06/2019 12:15:20 PM PDT by nwrep

SALEM – Oregon is close to becoming the 15th state to signal that it will award its Electoral College votes to the presidential candidate who receives the most votes nationwide.

On a 37-22 party line vote, the Democratic majority in the Oregon House sent Senate Bill 870 to the desk of Democratic Gov. Kate Brown, who has indicated her support.

Instead, said Rep. Allisa Keny-Guyer, D-Portland, the compact would make Oregon more relevant during presidential campaigns. “The Republican presidential candidates write Oregon totally off, and the Democratic candidates take Oregon for granted,” she said. “So we are just relegated to being a spectator state.”


TOPICS: Constitution/Conservatism; Front Page News; News/Current Events; US: Oregon
KEYWORDS: 2020election; allisakenyguyer; election; election2020; electoralcollege; faithlesselectors; howardschultz; katebrown; nationalpopularvote; npv; oregon; portland; senatebill870; starbucks
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-6061-80 ... 101-116 next last
To: Mr.Unique; Wonka

.
>> “One man, one vote” is not what the EC does. <<

True, in fact “One man one vote” is a direct attack on the Republican government guaranteed in the constitution.
.


21 posted on 06/06/2019 12:31:29 PM PDT by editor-surveyor (Freepers: Not as smart as I'd hoped they'd be)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 13 | View Replies]

To: Brilliant

The only positive is this gives conservatives in blue states a reason to go vote. Cali had 2 Dems on ballot for senator, that had to suppress conservative vote.


22 posted on 06/06/2019 12:33:44 PM PDT by teevolt
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 15 | View Replies]

To: nwrep

.
When did ‘she’ have ‘her’ choppadictomy?
.


23 posted on 06/06/2019 12:33:46 PM PDT by editor-surveyor (Freepers: Not as smart as I'd hoped they'd be)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: nwrep

You can bet they will toss this aside if a Republican wins the popular vote.

There will be a lawsuit and the state will simply decline to defend.


24 posted on 06/06/2019 12:39:23 PM PDT by BenLurkin (The above is not a statement of fact. It is either opinion or satire. Or both.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: nwrep

Another state that will have its electoral votes discarded for violating the Constitution.


25 posted on 06/06/2019 12:40:10 PM PDT by kaehurowing
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: teevolt

Yes, but it also gives Dems an incentive to vote. Moreover, it gives CA Dems an incentive to cheat, which is what this is really about. They can determine how many votes the Dem needs before the polls close, and then supply them.

Maybe now that all these states are dependent upon the vote in CA, the media should stop tracking the election results on election night. It’s really irrelevant until CA votes.


26 posted on 06/06/2019 12:40:39 PM PDT by Brilliant
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 22 | View Replies]

To: Williams

The whole idea is to create confusion. The Democrats never acknowledge a Republican winner. In 2000 it was the DNC fostering the mess in Florida which ended up with their faithful yelling Bush was selected not elected.

The only reason they were quite in 2008 and 2012 was because Big Mike’s husband won.

This attempt to change, call into question the fairness of the Electoral College is about destroying the current POTUS and then manipulating the system so the DEMS never looses power again.

They have completely given up any facade that they respect the Constitution or the rule of law.


27 posted on 06/06/2019 12:41:24 PM PDT by highpockets
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 18 | View Replies]

To: thoughtomator

This is setting up Trump to win electoral votes he would have no chance at otherwise. Boy are they going to have egg on their faces when they lose the popular vote this time around.”

Trump lost the irrelevant popular vote by a couple of million votes. Just a coincidence that Hillary won California by about the same margin she won the popular vote.

Pulled the same crap with Bernie on the delegates. Without the super delegates, Hillary wouldn’t have gone over the top on the first ballot.

What I would love to see is Trump winning the popular vote and losing some of these lefty states. Watch the lefties change their tune about who they are giving their electoral votes to.


28 posted on 06/06/2019 12:41:27 PM PDT by EQAndyBuzz (Trump is President and CEO of America, Inc.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: nwrep

We have a system set up to elect our President.

It has worked for quite some time.

Who really wants to change our system?

Other nations who compete with The United States.

We can say it’s the Democrat Party trying to destroy our country, but they are just a front.

The Democrat Party is a front for individuals who take money from nations trying to destroy The United States.


29 posted on 06/06/2019 12:41:54 PM PDT by blueunicorn6 ("A crack shot and a good dancer")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: nwrep

WTF is happening to our country?


30 posted on 06/06/2019 12:42:03 PM PDT by shanover (...To disarm the people is the best and most effectual way to enslave them.-S.Adams)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: nwrep

The States that vote to by-pass the electoral college shouldn’t even be allowed to have their votes counted at all.


31 posted on 06/06/2019 12:43:14 PM PDT by mass55th ("Courage is being scared to death, but saddling up anyway." ~~ John Wayne)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: BigEdLB
I thought there was a provision in the Constitution whiich prevents one state from doing something based on another states actions

There is, but its complicated. Rather than mess up the summary, I refer you to the Wikipedia article on this:

Wikipedia article on National Popular Vote Compact

It's scary stuff. It would surely wind up in the Supreme Court, but that's a crapshoot IMHO affected by elections and illnesses as much as by the intent of the Constitution.

32 posted on 06/06/2019 12:43:18 PM PDT by Pearls Before Swine
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: blueunicorn6

“Yes, I took bribe money, but I just took it from a person who is really passionate about Liberal causes.”

“You took money from a person who took money from a nation trying to destroy your nation, The United States.”

“No! No! I’m just a thief! I’m not a traitor!”

“You took that money knowing full well that your actions were harmful to the people of this country. You ARE a traitor.”


33 posted on 06/06/2019 12:48:29 PM PDT by blueunicorn6 ("A crack shot and a good dancer")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 29 | View Replies]

To: nwrep

[[Instead, said Rep. Allisa Keny-Guyer, D-Portland, the compact would make Oregon more relevant during presidential campaigns. “The Republican presidential candidates write Oregon totally off, and the Democratic candidates take Oregon for granted,” she said. “So we are just relegated to being a spectator state.”]]

I had to put on my hip boots for that one.


34 posted on 06/06/2019 12:48:59 PM PDT by headstamp 2
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: thesharkboy

newfreep you are right. These arrangements amount to compacts between and among the states, which is constitutionally prohibited.

An analogy is price fixing. Suppose I make a statement that I will keep my price at competitive levels until my rivals all raise their prices to the monopoly level. But as soon as these rivals all raise their prices to monopoly levels I will follow suit.

I am not entering into any formal contract or compact with my competitors to restrain competition, but 100 out of 100 judges would call this naked price fixing and send me off to jail.


35 posted on 06/06/2019 12:49:19 PM PDT by drellberg
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 8 | View Replies]

To: nwrep

bump


36 posted on 06/06/2019 12:50:53 PM PDT by foreverfree
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: nwrep

I can’t wait for 2020, when Trump wins the popular vote and all these blue states suddenly realize what a foolish thing they are doing.


37 posted on 06/06/2019 12:52:09 PM PDT by Not A Snowbird (I trust President Trump.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: nwrep

Maine and Nebraska do it far more intelligently and fairly, reflecting the votes of their constituents by congressional district.


38 posted on 06/06/2019 12:52:31 PM PDT by MSF BU
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: everyone

In Alabama it is a republican lock so I never had a motivation to vote. If my vote can help sway Oregon to Trump, I’m all in.


39 posted on 06/06/2019 12:54:48 PM PDT by lerker
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: everyone

In Alabama it is a republican lock so I never had a motivation to vote. If my vote can help sway Oregon to Trump, I’m all in.


40 posted on 06/06/2019 12:54:50 PM PDT by lerker
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-6061-80 ... 101-116 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson