Posted on 06/03/2019 6:09:58 PM PDT by yesthatjallen
The House will vote next week to hold Attorney General William Barr in contempt of Congress for declining to comply with a subpoena for special counsel Robert Mueller’s full report and related evidence.
The resolution will also target former White House counsel Don McGahn, who has defied a Democratic subpoena to appear before Congress.
The vote, scheduled for June 11, marks a major escalation of tensions between the Trump administration and House Democrats, who have launched a series of investigations into the president’s conduct in office — probes in which the White House has largely refused to cooperate.
“The Attorney General can’t ignore a legal subpoena and get away with it,” tweeted Rep. Val Demings (D-Fla.), a member of the Judiciary Committee.
But it falls short of launching an impeachment inquiry, the step a growing number of Democrats are demanding.
“No, no, no, no, no, no, no. Contempt? What’s the punishment? ... I’m for impeachment y’all. Period!” House Financial Services Committee Chairwoman Maxine Waters (D-Calif.) said in response to a question about holding Barr in contempt.
The contempt vote offers a way for House Democrats to make an aggressive move against the Trump administration that stops short of impeachment as the number of lawmakers endorsing the beginning of such an inquiry grew on Monday to more than 50.
“This Administration’s systematic refusal to provide Congress with answers and cooperate with Congressional subpoenas is the biggest cover-up in American history, and Congress has a responsibility to provide oversight on behalf of the American people,” House Majority Leader Steny Hoyer (D-Md.) said in a statement.
Tensions with Barr have intensified since March, when Mueller released his report on Russian interference in the 2016 elections. And they bubbled up once again last week after Mueller delivered remarks from the Justice Department — his first public comments over the course of the two-year investigation — in which he explicitly declined to exonerate President Trump of obstruction of justice crimes.
The civil contempt resolution will allow the House Judiciary Committee to pursue enforcement of its subpoenas in federal court. It will further authorize House committees that have issued subpoenas that are also ignored to seek legal action.
“I think people want to see us holding this administration accountable. This is an important way of doing it,” Rep. David Cicilline (D-R.I.), a Judiciary Committee member who chairs House Democrats’ messaging arm, said after a leadership meeting on Monday.
Barr has been a Democratic target since even before Trump tapped him to replace former Attorney General Jeff Sessions in December.
Working in the private sector last year, Barr penned an unsolicited memo to the Justice Department — 19 pages long — arguing that Mueller had no legal basis for investigating Trump for obstructing justice. The letter led to Democratic charges that Trump hand-picked an attorney general who would safely put the task of protecting the president above that of enforcing the nation’s laws.
The Democrats’ distrust with the attorney general reached another peak in April, when it was revealed that Barr’s initial framing of Mueller’s findings had so irritated the special counsel that he wrote to Barr directly to express his agitation.
Mueller last week said he believed Barr had acted in “good faith” in issuing a memo summarizing Mueller’s findings.
The scheduling of contempt votes on Barr and McGahn was just one example on Monday that Democratic patience with the Trump administration is wearing thin.
The new development came hours after House Oversight and Reform Committee Chairman Elijah Cummings (D-Md.) announced a vote on holding Barr and Commerce Secretary Wilbur Ross in contempt over the panel’s investigation into the Trump administration’s efforts to add a citizenship question to the 2020 census.
“Unfortunately, your actions are part of a pattern. The Trump Administration has been engaged in one of the most unprecedented cover-ups since Watergate, extending from the White House to multiple federal agencies and departments of the government and across numerous investigations,” Cummings wrote in letters to Barr and Ross.
A committee spokeswoman told The Hill that the votes are expected next week, but Cummings indicated that he'd be willing to hold off if certain documents are provided to the committee by Thursday.
Next week’s vote will be the second time in seven years that the House has voted to hold an attorney general in contempt.
In 2012, House Republicans voted to hold then-Attorney General Eric Holder in contempt of Congress for failing to turn over documents related to the Fast and Furious gun-tracking operation.
At the time, the House passed resolutions to hold Holder both in criminal contempt and civil contempt. But the Justice Department quickly dismissed the criminal contempt measure and declined to press prosecution against the attorney general.
A total of 17 House Democrats voted in support of the criminal contempt resolution against Holder, while 21 Democrats joined the GOP’s civil contempt effort.
But many Democrats walked off the floor during the vote in protest.
House Republican Conference Chairwoman Liz Cheney (Wyo.) said the Barr and McGahn contempt votes prove Democrats only care about one thing: trying to oust Trump.
“Democrats have clearly shown they are going to do whatever it takes to impeach the president, regardless of facts, regardless of the conclusions and outcomes of the Mueller report,” Cheney told The Hill.
“It’s really too bad that that’s how they’re behaving at a time there are some really serious challenges we ought to be facing head on.”
More spew from “The Hill” of trash.
The full summary of this entire sham was wrapped up bu AG Wm. Barr with just one word. During the bi-partisan senate hearings Lindsey Graham asked him if he trusted Robert Mueller and his reply was, “YES”.
There is nothing left now but theatrics as the grinding justice wheels of the beltway slowly eat up the clock to run out the statute of limitations on al, criminal activity that everyone knows transpired.
Dems can go to court and get the info from the Mueller released that they are seeking and follow it as far as they have to in the courts. They have that legal recourse.
And Barr is forbidden under law from unredacting the parts they want unredacted.
I think we need to put Willard on the roof rack and the dog in the Senate. There would be one bark against impeachment.
I thought he said recently he didn’t support it, but yeah, I don’t trust him when the time comes. Romney is the type that would want to impeach him and then run himself.
If corrupt Holder got his own DOJ to drop charges against him or refuse to pursue other ones, then Barr can do the same thing.
It is called “precedent”.
There is one different between Holder (Mr. Fast & Furious) and Barr. Holder was the most corrupt AG in the history of the US. Barr will go down as one of the most honorable.
The dead of Holder’s “Fast and Furious” demand a trial of Holder for malfeasance of office, lying to Congress, dereliction of duty re monitoring F&F, and the killing of an American law enforcement officer and scores, if not hundreds of Mexican cities with Holder supplied weapons.
I’ve worked under at least 6 Attorney Generals and with numerous AAGs’s. Holder was the most corrupt, going back even to the 1990’s. He must be brought to justice.
“Where are they getting their information? On what basis are they calling him a Nazi?”
You know ... they just parrot what the dem politicians say and the cable news shows talking heads call him.
You know the routine: Fascist, racist, homophobe, woman heater, etc....
And yet, as I have said before on FR, they are driving around in brand new cars, making lots of money in the good economy, going out to dinner all the time.
It seems that they all want to one-up each other in their hatred of Trump.
Man, it is getting very depressing up here in New England political wise.
Try living in VT.
AG Barr certainly has contempt for them so they won’t be totally wrong....idiots are what idiots doo and they really doo-doo..
Total nonsense. RATs daily prove nothing they say should be taken seriously.
blah, blah, blah - do nothing House Dems fueled by hatred for Trump and America.
They are whining like babies. It sounds like this.
This attorney general cannot get away with anything Holder did. Wahhhhhhh.
In a word ... yup.
In the past 30+ years I have lived in NH the place has been so invaded by Massachusetts people that they brought their ways with them. Plus the schools have really changed since I moved here. They are like replicas of Mass schools and the kids are very much indoctrinated in the liberal-regressive ways.
GroupThink has really taken hold up here and can easily be seen in the latest election we had in NH. Virtually all Repubs have been wiped out, the Governor we have is the last Repub in NE and he most likely won’t survive reelection next year.
“My understanding was that lots of people moved from MA to NH because of no state taxes there. But does that account for the big swing and what about the other NE states?”
In a word ... yes. Lots of people moved to NH from Mass (and NY and other New England stats), but they brought their voting history with them.
Like other have said in FR about people leaving California for Texas and other “red” states ... they crapped up their old nests and now want to crap up their new nests.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.