Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Mont had previously been convicted on felony drug and gun charges and served 84 months in prison before beginning a five-year supervised release due to end in March 2017. However, he faced other charges in 2015 and 2016 and was incarcerated in state jail in June 2016. After several delays of a hearing, a district court heard and ruled that Mont had violated his supervised release and imposed another prison sentence.

Did she fall again?

1 posted on 06/03/2019 4:19:33 PM PDT by Libloather
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies ]


To: Libloather

LOL

Maybe she just wanted to vote right once before she died :)


2 posted on 06/03/2019 4:20:56 PM PDT by dp0622 (The Left should know if Trump is kicked out of office, it is WAR!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Libloather

She’s a remarkably talented Justice, what with being able to issue opinions from beyond the grave and all.


4 posted on 06/03/2019 4:28:57 PM PDT by thoughtomator (The Clinton Coup attempt was a worse attack on the USA than was 9/11)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Libloather

Wait a second...the guy was never released from prison and because he was never released he failed his ‘supervised release’ and that got him four more years in prison???

What????????????


5 posted on 06/03/2019 4:30:22 PM PDT by MeganC (There is nothing feminine about feminism.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Libloather

Her clerks asked Justice Ginsburg to blink once if she was voting with the Chief Justice and to blink twice if she was voting against the CJ.

She blinked once. The clerks rushed out of the room to cast her vote.

Five minutes later she blinked again. But no one was there to see it.


6 posted on 06/03/2019 4:31:28 PM PDT by Meet the New Boss
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Libloather

Anybody witness her vote?


7 posted on 06/03/2019 4:31:51 PM PDT by samtheman (To steal an election, who do you collude with? Russians in Russia or Mexicans in California?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Libloather

The bigger news to me is that Gorsuch was over on the left again. Is it blackmail, or was he a closet lefty all along himself and/or is he looking to become the new swing vote once Trump replaces RBG?


8 posted on 06/03/2019 4:37:40 PM PDT by 9YearLurker
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Libloather

Pictures, or it didn’t happen as described.
Put Judge Ruth on a milk carton, if drinking milk is still a common thing. I don’t drink it straight. Ever.


13 posted on 06/03/2019 4:56:23 PM PDT by lee martell
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Libloather

Tell the dumb people who think she’s dead.


19 posted on 06/03/2019 5:38:06 PM PDT by bigbob (Trust Trump. Trust the Plan.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Libloather

She was programmed to find out how Gorsuch was voting and to vote the opposite way.


20 posted on 06/03/2019 5:42:15 PM PDT by PAR35
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Libloather

Was it her, or was it some think tank that came up with this?

I’m seriously wondering...


28 posted on 06/03/2019 8:20:59 PM PDT by DoughtyOne (Can I get a shout out for the person(s) who donated $2,000.00 from France? Thanks so much! Wow!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Libloather

Ruthy must be getting some...


30 posted on 06/03/2019 8:48:34 PM PDT by SuperLuminal (Where is Sam Adams now that we desperately need him)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Libloather

Justice Neil Gorsuch joined liberal Justices Sonia Sotomayor, Stephen Breyer and Elena Kagan in opposing the decision.


Gorsuch seems the bigger problem.


33 posted on 06/04/2019 3:38:47 AM PDT by New Jersey Realist ( Be kind to your children. They will determine where you live when you get old.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Libloather

Seriously, can I vent for a second. The SC is debating the hunting rights of some American Indian last week and now some scum bag drug dealer, yet every important case regarding abortion, teaching faggotry to school children, etc. etc. the SC refuses to take the case. “Well they get 10,000 requests a year” bla bla bla bla,
Just wish Trump would 1) Pick the right people to listen to. and 2) listen to the right people. Thomas and Alito are the ONLY trustworthy ones on the court. Clerking for Kennedy is a disqualification, not a resume enhancer. Let Thomas pick the SC replacements. And DONT say they can’t, don’t, that is not the process bla bla bla, you know what I mean. Conservatives, Christians, whatever we call ourselves kill ourselves with our own virtue. You have to fight fire with fire. The other side puts people who they know are 110% committed to evil on the courts, and we bother with “highly qualified” and “recommended” and all that garbage. We shouldn’t care if a judge has a high school diploma if we know how he/she will vote for life. this is a matter of life and death, the existence of our nation and these fools on the SC are pissing around with stupid cases involving scum bag druggies. sorry to rant.


38 posted on 06/04/2019 7:04:49 AM PDT by pghbjugop
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson