Yep.
Posted on 06/02/2019 6:46:30 AM PDT by SMGFan
I never called Meghan Markle “nasty.” Made up by the Fake News Media, and they got caught cold! Will @CNN, @nytimes and others apologize? Doubt it!
Check back in another 1000 or so years and we’ll let you know.
Check back in another 1000 or so years and we’ll let you know.
Sorry....post was meant for allendale.
Well, not following your link but please read what said broadcasted.
“The duchess of Sussex, Meghan Markle, will not be attending the state visit, Mr. President, because she’s on maternity leave. Are you sorry you can’t see her? Because she wasn’t so nice about you during the campaign. I don’t know if you saw that.” Trump doesn’t have the slightest idea. I’ll guarantee you. He doesn’t know that she’s pregnant, doesn’t know that she’s sick, doesn’t know that she’s not coming. He doesn’t know anything. He’s gotta answer the question, though. So listen to the answer. It’s Trump repeating himself two or three times. It’s what he does when he’s trying to fill time but doesn’t really know what he’s been asked about here.
THE PRESIDENT: I didn’t know that, no.
DUNN: Yeah!
THE PRESIDENT: I didn’t know that. No, I hope she’s okay. I did not know that, no.
DUNN: She said she’d move to Canada if you got elected. Turned out, she moved to Britain.
THE PRESIDENT: Well, that’ll be good. A lot of people moving here. So, what can I say? No, I didn’t know that she was nasty.
DUNN: Is it good having an American princess then, Mr. President?
THE PRESIDENT: I think it’s nice, and I’m sure she’ll do excellently. She’ll be… She’ll be very good. She’ll be very good. I hope she does.
RUSH: He hasn’t the slightest idea what he’s being asked! “I hope she’ll be very good. I know she’ll be very good. I hope she’s excellent.” He doesn’t have the slightest idea. He doesn’t care. What he says here when he says, “I didn’t know that she was nasty,” is he didn’t know that she had ripped him! He didn’t know that she had been critical. He didn’t know that she claimed she was gonna move out of the country. He didn’t know — and to him, when you criticize him, you’re nasty.
He called Hillary Clinton, “She’s a nasty woman” because of what she said about him. He didn’t just pull “nasty” out of thin air and attach it to her. It is the fact that he didn’t know that she ripped him and now he’s being asked to comment on it, and he says, “I didn’t know that she was nasty,” meaning, “She had been unkind to me.” He’s not talking about who she is, what kind of person she is. This is the kind of thing that if you don’t take the time to get to know the person — and, by the way, they don’t care.
Even if they knew who Trump was — if they knew his thought and speech patterns, if they knew how he reacted — they would have still run this story this way. It doesn’t matter. This is why Trump is constantly pushing back against these people. You’ve gotta put yourself in his shoes. You’re lied about four times a day every day — 24/7, 365 — by the Drive-By Media, who are doing nothing more than trying to destroy your reputation, destroy your presidency. This is another classic example.=
https://www.rushlimbaugh.com/daily/2019/06/03/trump-fights-back-against-onslaught-of-fake-news/
They’re pure evil.
Somehow, I’m not following your reply to my posting that YT audio.
He said:
“No, I didn’t know that she was nasty.”
There’s no reference to “nasty” prior to DJT saying it. He needed to be more specific in what he meant about “nasty”. The way it’s transcribed, it can be taken a couple of ways.
He says in a tweet, “he never said she was nasty”.
Clearly, he did say it.
But *what* was he referring to, is the question.
I know what, you know what, and anyone with a functioning brain knows what he was referring to.
The corrupt DBMs have latched onto it, and are using his adjective against him. He needed to say that her language or attitude was “nasty”, not her. (Though she is a nasty b*tch, IMO.)
The demonkkkRATs and DBM filth clearly don’t functioning brains.
Check the audio. He calls HER STATEMENT nasty. He DOES NOT call HER nasty.
my point Rush expressed a point to millions of listeners. Rush comments will reinforce the iews of those who support Trump.
Yes , there are fervent anti- Trump being given ammo as seen as I flip past CNN or MSNBCLBGQT.
“nasty” has been many more meanings since Trump ran for office
One thing the faisco does prove, that Megan the Duchess is susceptible to propaganda. If she is goingto be a public figure for the Royal family, she has to figure out a way to have the truth in her plate and figure out a way to stop having tantrums.
In other words, Meghan needs a real press secretary on her staff.One that can tell shit from shinola. Or else she will be only a short time royal, divorced with kids, pushing her own pram.
The name sounds familiar, likely from the list that were booted from this forum for NeverTrump comments (all Cruzers) a few years ago. Almost positive he was one of those.
Yep.
nasty
In Queens New York clipped Trumpspeak, that came out as "I didn't know she was nasty [to me]."
-PJ
Force the infrastructure companies like Comcast and ATT to sell off their news and media operations. Such vertical control of information must be outlawed.
NBC MSNBC CNBC are Comcast
CNN is ATT
Don’t be silly they are better than you, that’s why they are Royals. :^)
President Trump didn’t call her nasty, but I will.
Saying what she said is nasty.. therefore she is a Nasty person. Case closed.
Yes.. as it transpired, President Trump was calling her words nasty. He obviously has no animosity towards her. Only good will. The Media are Dispicable Lying Scumbags Hellbent on trashing the Best POTUS since George Washington!!!
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.