Posted on 05/27/2019 2:07:06 PM PDT by Beautiful_Gracious_Skies
The tapes are scheduled for release in 8 years, but David Garrow has unearthed FBI summaries of the various perverted and disgusting incidents. Famed biographer David Garrow has discovered FBI summaries of the incident.
In what seems to be an unreal revelation, secret tapes complied by the Federal Bureau of Investigation apparently show Martin Luther King Jr. laughing and watching while a friend rapes a woman.[snip]
The shocking files could lead to a ‘painful historical reckoning’ for the man who is celebrated across the world for his campaign against racial injustice, according to one biographer....
But David Garrow, a biographer of King who won a Pulitzer Prize for his 1987 book Bearing the Cross about the Baptist minister, has unearthed the FBI summaries of the various incidents. In an article to be published in Standpoint, Garrow tells how the FBI .... ordered the surveillance of King in an effort to undermine his power amid fears he could have links to the Communist Party. .....
... from the Willard Hotel near the WH shows how King accompanied his friend Logan Kearse, the pastor of Baltimore’s Cornerstone Baptist church..., along with several female parishioners of his church. In King’s hotel room, the files claim they then ‘discussed which women among the parishioners would be suitable for natural and unnatural sex acts’.
The FBI document says: ‘When one of the women protested that she did not approve, the Baptist minister immediately and forcefully raped her’ as King watched.
He is alleged to have ‘looked on, laugh and offered advice’ during the encounter. FBI agents were in the room next door but did not intervene.
The following day, King and a dozen others allegedly participated in a ‘sex orgy’ engaging in ‘acts of degeneracy and depravity’. When one woman showed reluctance, King was allegedly heard saying that performing the act ‘would help your soul’...
Senior FBI officials later sent King a copy of the incriminating tape and called him an ‘evil abnormal beast’ and his sexual exploits would be ‘on record for all time’.The letter also [seemed to] suggest he should commit suicide before his wrongs were revealed to the world.
King’s philandering has long been suspected, however Garrow, who spent several months digging through the archive material, said he said he had no idea of the scale or the ugliness of it and his apparent indifference to rape until he saw the files
He said: ‘It poses so fundamental a challenge to his historical stature as to require the most complete and extensive historical review possible.’
Among the revelations is a claim by a prostitute who said she was involved in a threesome with King, which she described as the worst orgy she had ever experienced.
His wife Coretta often complained he was hardly with her and even said he would spend less than 10 hours a month at home. According to one FBI report, King even said: ‘She should go out and have some sexual affairs of her own.’
There is even a suggestion in the files that King fathered a daughter with a secret girlfriend in Los Angeles. Both the mother and child are alive but refused to talk to Garrow.
If these tapes actually exist, which evidence does seem to indicate, it demonstrates that people who try to disparage the lives of people who lived before them (like the founders), using rumors and accusations have nothing like the evidence now exposed against the republican Civil Rights leader.
One of King’s most distinguished biographers, Taylor Branch, revealed how
— on King’s trip to Norway to collect the 1964 Nobel Peace Prize — members of his entourage were found running after naked or near-naked prostitutes in the Oslo hotel where they were staying. Only a desperate appeal to hotel security saved them from being thrown out.
Branch also detailed how FBI agents bugged King’s hotel room in Washington in January 1964 and recorded him in adulterous full flow. ‘I’m f*****g for God! I’m not a negro tonight!’ he could be heard shouting.
What are they trying to distract us from?
That's a damn fine question!
“I withhold judgment until proven ...”
Ditto
Tear down the statues
_______________
And rename the streets.
This was investigated by James comey, John Brennan, James clapper and Peter Strzok years ago.
Brian Williams gave an excellent review of the goings on...
Classy. I’m thinking we’re looking at the tip of the iceberg.
Absolutely, he played a key role for the advancement of Civil Rights, but the myth that followed and was perpetuated by the King family is truly incredible. And we can’t blame Hoover for bugging King, nor Bobby Kennedy for signing the warrant.
King’s director was Stanley David Levinson, a Communist Party USA member and KGB asset.
He was his attorney, fund-raiser, speech-writer, organizer, PR officer, treasurer and financier.
Levinson, known as the Assistant Chief, did ALL of the following for MLK:
1. He was his principal advisor and legal counsel
2. He conducted fund raisers for King and the SCLC
3. He researched, wrote and presented speech material for King
4. He scheduled and rejected public appearances for King
5. He was the Asst. Treasurer of the SCLC
6. He was financing the SCLC through the CPUSA
7. He hired other CPUSA members as organizers and secretaries for King
8. He directed what King was to say or and was not say in public
9. He both edited and wrote articles and sections of books that King presented as his own
Nearly all of King’s top advisors, speech writers, organizers, and personal assistants, were specifically recruited from within the ranks of the CPUSA, often by Levison himself.
Many of King’s loyal supporters were either Communist Party USA members or supporters at various times of their careers: Wyatt T. Walker, Ralph D. Abernathy who later defected from the Soviet KGB front, the World Peace Council, Stoney Cook (limited contacts), Rev. Willie Barrows and the Rev. Jesse Jackson.
Williams said something like, “People Need to believe the Myth” instead of the man.
I suspect the same. The historian and beloved admirer of King has spent years researching and writing very positively on King.
Now he has unearthed a treasure trove of documents that reveal the complete nature and confirm decades of rumor and innuendo.
Garrow has ignored or quelched Kings communist support and blatant serial plagiarism to paint King in the most positive light and maintain King’s sainthood status.
I guess he had a really gross reality check and decided to be honest and not let the secrets lie till 2027.
Now that he has gained access, others could FOIA the same records.
There’s going to be a whole bunch of boulevards need renaming.
Ha!!!
But the article concludes by pointing out MLK was republican.
At least for a time, the deep state needed King. He was an acceptable alternative to the hard left radicals that wanted revolution, revenge, and plunder, and who were heavily funded by the Chinese Communists (i.e., Mao).
But what was Deep State’s involvement in having him executed? Perhaps, they were hoping to trigger an uprising, as an excuse to implement social controls (like they did anyway after 911).
If this is true, they’re going to start referring to MLK as a Republican again. Oh wait—
Well, see. The FBI was spying on MLK, and he was a great man. So what’s wrong with the FBI spying on Donald Trump?
White People Create App To Avoid, Um, ‘Sketchy’ Areas
https://www.huffpost.com/entry/sketchfactor-app-white-creators_n_5660205
And where are all the tapes of Trump as he was spied upon? Was he laughing at rapes and other horrendous things?
I’m trying to figure out why this is being released now. I figure that if they had a tape of Donald Trump laughing at a woman being raped, then they would have found a way to release it. They tried with the fake pee pee dossier and failed.
Well, we certainly know now that the FBI should not always be believed.
Yes, what is the right hand doing?
Myths of Martin Luther King==By Marcus Epstein January 18, 2003 The full explanations at the source.
There is probably no greater sacred cow in America than Martin Luther King Jr. The slightest criticism of him or even suggesting that he isn’t deserving of a national holiday leads to the usual accusations of racist, fascism, and the rest of the usual left-wing epithets not only from liberals, but also from many ostensible conservatives and libertarians...
Today, the official conservative and libertarian movement portrays King as someone on our side who would be fighting Jesse Jackson and Al Sharpton if he were alive. Most all conservative publications and websites have articles around this time of the year praising King and discussing how today’s civil rights leaders are betraying his legacy......
... many King admirers even claim to adhere to principles like freedom of association and federalism. ...They have created a mythical Martin Luther King Jr., that they constructed solely from one line in his “I Have a Dream” speech.
In this article, I will try to dispel the major myths that the conservative movement has about King.... in I May Not Get There With You: The True Martin Luther King by black leftist Michael Eric Dyson. Dyson shows that King supported black power, reparations, affirmative action, and socialism. He believes this made King even more admirable. He also deals frankly with King’s philandering and plagiarism, though he excuses them. ....
Myth #1: King wanted only equal rights, not special privileges and would have opposed affirmative action, quotas, reparations, and the other policies pursued by today’s civil rights leadership.
Myth # 2: King was an American patriot, who tried to get Americans to live up to their founding ideals.
Myth # 3: King was a Christian activist whose struggle for civil rights is similar to the battles fought by the Christian Right today.
Myth # 4: King was an anti-communist. Though never a Communist, he had knowingly surrounded himself with Communists.
Myth # 5: King supported the free market.
Myth # 6: King was a conservative.
Myth # 7: King wasn’t a plagiarist.- 45%-80%
Rather than face the truth about King’s views, they create a man based upon a few lines about judging men “by the content of their character rather than the color of their skin” – something we are not supposed to do in his case, of course – while ignoring everything else he said and did. If King is truly an admirable figure, they are doing his legacy a disservice by using his name to promote an agenda he clearly would not have supported.
https://www.lewrockwell.com/2003/01/marcus-epstein/myths-of-martin-luther-king/
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.