Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: Sooth2222

You’re confusing the indictments here. What you’re describing was the original indictment that was announced a few weeks ago. These are different charges. And since these charges will almost certainly not hold up in court, I really have to wonder what the DOJ’s angle is here.


23 posted on 05/26/2019 5:43:41 AM PDT by Alberta's Child ("Out on the road today I saw a Deadhead sticker on a Cadillac.")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 9 | View Replies ]


To: Alberta's Child

Could it have something to do with the European Convention on Extradition?


24 posted on 05/26/2019 5:45:57 AM PDT by mewzilla (Break out the mustard seeds.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 23 | View Replies ]

To: Alberta's Child

The way to prove Wikileaks did not collaborate with the Russians is to put them on trial and be aquitted.

The DNC insider that leaked will then be revealed free of the russia taint


26 posted on 05/26/2019 5:49:55 AM PDT by bert ( (KE. NP. N.C. +12)There were Democrat espionage operations on Republican candidates)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 23 | View Replies ]

To: Alberta's Child

DOJ wants Snowden in the USA to testify the DNC email exposure was from a leak, not a hack.

It’s a tug of war for extradition.


27 posted on 05/26/2019 5:52:43 AM PDT by Hostage (Article V)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 23 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson