Posted on 04/20/2019 5:59:24 PM PDT by Innovative
The F.B.I. on Saturday arrested the leader of a right-wing militia that was detaining migrant families at gunpoint near the border in southern New Mexico, as the group faced a torrent of criticism for its tactics.
Hector Balderas, New Mexicos attorney general, said federal agents had arrested the leader, Larry Mitchell Hopkins, who had been operating under the alias Johnny Horton Jr. Mr. Balderas said in a statement that Mr. Hopkins was arrested on charges of firearms possession by a felon.
This is a dangerous felon who should not have weapons around children and families, Mr. Balderas said. Todays arrest by the F.B.I. indicates clearly that the rule of law should be in the hands of trained law enforcement officials, not armed vigilantes.
(Excerpt) Read more at nytimes.com ...
meanwhile in Texas:
U.S. Soldiers Are Disarmed, Held At Gunpoint By Mexican Troops In Texas 4-20-2019
http://freerepublic.com/focus/f-news/3743504/posts
NM Ping List.
I figured this would soon be happening. Probably was a race between the FBI and Governorlissima Moochie Lujan sending the State Police to do it.
Neither the Feds nor the Leftist Regime that now runs New Mexico wants anyone actually stopping the invasion.
FBI still working for the deep state, drain this FN swamp already
The FBI is a communist organization. They ‘ve been infiltrated imo.
They should be paid and not arrested.
You are a f---ing idiot.
BP = The Welcome Wagon, handing out work permits, UBER drivers for illegals, handing out EBT and welfare. F the whole system.
While I dont know what the felony was, the law is what it is. Felons cant own or possess.
One of the biggest problems with DV laws today is an angry ex makes a DV claim and the (usually) ex-husband takes a plea instead of fighting it in court. The DV sticks even if he doesnt do jail time. Well, thats sadly the law and if thats you, you better be smart enough not to get caught possessing after that, or fight the charge in court and make the prosecutor prove his damn case instead of giving him a win with a reduced charge plea.
OK, so you don't know what the "dangerous felony" is.
I've been reading about Stalin's "Great Terror", and the responses of the Russian people when the NKVD showed up at their doors in the middle of the night.
The Russians seem to have similar ideas about "law and ordure" that I see on a lot of conservative forums.
"How can agents of The State possibly be wrong? They're chust enfarcing the lore!"
Remind me how much time the felons Clinton served in prison, again... ;-)
One of the biggest problems with DV laws today is an angry ex makes a DV claim and the (usually) ex-husband takes a plea instead of fighting it in court. The DV sticks even if he doesnt do jail time. Well, thats sadly the law and if thats you, you better be smart enough not to get caught possessing after that, or fight the charge in court and make the prosecutor prove his damn case instead of giving him a win with a reduced charge plea.
Very sound advice. Two thumbs up! :-)
What is missing here is the precedent this sets in New Mexico in the future (after July 1 2019). That is when acquisition of a firearm without a federal background check becomes against the law in New Mexico. So if law enforcement is out to get someone as in this instance they can attempt to make a case that because a firearm is not registered, it was illegally acquired, even if was bought from a private party before July 1, or bought legally from an out-of-state party not covered by NM law. All of a sudden, all gun owners are under suspicion as lawbreakers. LEO may not be able to prove their case in court, but just the attempt suceeds in bringing a chill to citizens supporting Second Amendment rights.
Actually felony doesnt describe anything about the crime except the penalty. Im not an attorney, and various states may have different laws, but a felony is usually described as a crime with a penalty of one year or more incarceration. A misdemeanor is a crime with a penalty of less than a year incarceration. So I can only presume (I try to never assume) that a dangerous felony involved some threat or action of violence, as opposed to cheating on your taxes. Not sure what the legal definition is.
Happy Easter
Happy Easter! :-)
He [Larry Mitchell Hopkins aka Johnny Horton] has a long arrest record, dating back to at least 1986, when he was arrested and convicted of the felony of false pretenses, or fraud, in Midland County, Michigan.
Decades later, in 2006, Hopkins was arrested in Klamath County, Oregon on charges of impersonating a police officer and being a felon in possession of a firearm.
https://heavy.com/news/2019/04/larry-mitchell-hopkins/
So, it appears as though our "dangerous felon" became a felon by committing fraud, and then lore enfarcement was able to continue ramping up charges on him when he insisted on carrying firearms in subsequent years.
Leading to the Lying Liar Attorney General of New Mexico (D-Mehican Drug Cartels) being able to smear Hopkins as ...a dangerous felon who should not have weapons around children and families.
AG Hector Balderdash is full of Mitt.
He [Larry Mitchell Hopkins aka Johnny Horton] has a long arrest record, dating back to at least 1986, when he was arrested and convicted of the felony of false pretenses, or fraud, in Midland County, Michigan.
Decades later, in 2006, Hopkins was arrested in Klamath County, Oregon on charges of impersonating a police officer and being a felon in possession of a firearm.
https://heavy.com/news/2019/04/larry-mitchell-hopkins/
So, it appears as though our "dangerous felon" became a felon by committing fraud, and then lore enfarcement was able to continue ramping up charges on him when he insisted on carrying firearms in subsequent years.
Leading to the Lying Liar Attorney General of New Mexico (D-Mehican Drug Cartels) being able to smear Hopkins as ...a dangerous felon who should not have weapons around children and families.
AG Hector "I'm In The Pocket Of The Drug Cartels!" Balderdash is full of Mitt.
The blood lines of the minutemen is still with us. But now they call them vigilantes. Fair enough.
Whoa, hang on a second.
You don’t think that a convicted felon going around armed and impersonating a police officer is a big deal? If he did that, this guy is a nut job and has no business being anywhere near this militia.
[You are a f-—ing idiot. ]
If you were reading for comprehension, you would have noticed that what was going on was actually quite unclear.
My first question would have been:
Was he trying to scare them? Was he trying to impress them?
Go back and re-read it, and then tell me where we find that out.
[Strangled the K dynasty in its crib?? How then did we get Teddys 1960s immigration law change so that we now allow in anyone regardless of how they affect society?]
Let’s answer your question. He showed them a fake badge which read “Special Agent,” and showed off his gun. Does that sound sane and normal to you? Concealed carry doesn’t mean, “bring out your gun and show it off.”
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.