Posted on 04/20/2019 4:58:42 AM PDT by Sir Napsalot
Obama-era Attorney General Eric Holder claimed Friday that any “competent” prosecutor would be able to make a successful obstruction of justice case against President Trump based on the findings outlined in special counsel Robert Mueller’s report.
“ANY competent public corruption prosecutor would bring obstruction charges against Trump/and win. Only reason Mueller did not was because of the flawed DOJ [Justice Department] restriction against indicting a sitting President. He said so (below). Congress now has a constitutional responsibility,” Holder wrote on Twitter.
(Excerpt) Read more at breitbart.com ...
McGahn was a lawyer for the office of the President, IIRC. That means no attorney-client, only executive privilege.
I must disagree with that assessment unfortunately.
There was one fool more worthless than Eric the Black, but this fool wasn’t black.
This fool is named Jefferson Beauregard Sessions.
He was the most useless fool in the world, because in the very least, Eric the Black served his master well.
Yet Comey said no good prosecutor would be able to convict Hillary on her classified email misconduct.
LOL. I’ll bet 3/4 of the evidence would be ruled inadmissible in court.
Just go away dude!
SOONER or later that net will get you.
Only qualified to do Obungholes dirty work.
And I wonder.....
How much of this “obstruction” occurred while they were telling Trump he was not a target of the investigation?
Obstructing a coup?
Well that rules you out.....eric protected by executive privilege holder....fn partisan hack crook
POST 75-
You cannot obstruct nor be exonerated from a non-existent crime.
. . . “Let the jury consider their verdict,” the King said, for about the twentieth time that day.
“No, no!” said the Queen. “Sentence first–verdict afterward.”
“Stuff and nonsense!” said Alice loudly. “The idea of having the sentence first!”
“Hold your tongue!” said the Queen, turning purple.
“I won’t!” said Alice.
“Off with her head!” the Queen shouted at the top of her voice. Nobody moved.
“Who cares for you?” said Alice. (She had grown to her full size by this time.) “You’re nothing but a pack of cards!”
Trump in Wonderland
— Lewis Carroll, “Alice’s Adventures in Wonderland”
This response cited yesterday and it also seems to fit in this thread. I cannot remember who posted it. Thanks for the thought.
Only reason Mueller did not (bring obstruction of justice charges) was because of the flawed DOJ [Justice Department] restriction against indicting a sitting President …Ohh suure. Imagine if Holder had gotten rid of that rule (or attempted to) with Obama in power? Why did he keep it in place if it was so “flawed”, eh?
The Butcher of Waco has yet to pay for any of his crimes.
But he will not be the last to be held in contempt.
Maybe.
Well, except for the fact that it’s impossible for a sitting POTUS to commit Obstruction of Justice by definition.
Perhaps somebody should call the Shore Patrol.
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=wt1kK8gsag4
If Mueller could not bring charges of obstruction , then Holder is calling Mueller incompetent.
So Mueller is incompetent?
Actually, that could explain how he and his staff of angry Democrats could run a two and a half year witch hunt and not een find enough to justify making up some witches.
LOL! “Competent” and “Eric Holder” in same sentence! The worst dunce ever to ill serve our nation as AG. Too funny.
Be a shame if a bunch of yutes split his skull like a watermelon...
who had a friend boy named Smollett
Firing Mueller would not have been obstruction.
What sort of mental masturbation would assert that it could be?
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.