Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


1 posted on 04/13/2019 9:19:32 AM PDT by E. Pluribus Unum
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies ]


To: E. Pluribus Unum

They keep blaming Assange for Hitlery losing which is absolute BS. What did he do? The worst was he exposed Dummie Whatshername Schitz siding with Hitlery and it didn’t affect voters one way or the other. The REAL reason Hitlery lost is because she sat in her fat ass her entire campaign. Nobody knew what her message was plus everyone knows she’s a crook. Yet here we are heading into 3 years later and people are still kissing this witches ass instead of putting blame where blame lies, on HER!


2 posted on 04/13/2019 9:24:09 AM PDT by GrandJediMasterYoda (As long as Hillary walks free, equal justice under the law will never exist in the USA)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: E. Pluribus Unum

March 2010, wasn’t that during the 0bama administration, including when Hillary Clinton was Sec of State? Matter of fact, didn’t ALL of the so-called Russian meddling occur under the ever watchful eyes of 0bama, Clapper, Brennen, and Comey? How come this FACT is routinely ignored?


3 posted on 04/13/2019 9:25:35 AM PDT by euram (is)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: E. Pluribus Unum
It's a start. Manning is in prison right now.

If Assange comes here and should disappear, check out Marcy Park.

No way does Hillary want this guy to talk.

4 posted on 04/13/2019 9:27:22 AM PDT by Sacajaweau
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: E. Pluribus Unum
I wonder why they waited more than a year to arrest Assange? Also, there was something strange about the claim that Assange had basically gone crazy, and was smearing excrement on the embassy walls. Every time I've seen him interviewed, he seemed well-groomed and well-spoken and completely sane, even if you disagreed with him.

And no one on the left is emphasizing that the man Assange is accused of aiding and abetting - Bradley Manning - was given a quick commutation of sentence by Obama, as if Obama was saying, "An enemy of America is a friend of mine."
6 posted on 04/13/2019 9:42:11 AM PDT by Steve_Seattle
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: E. Pluribus Unum

No mention of espionage, because that would make him vulnerable to the death penalty, and the UK could not then extradite him under their laws.


8 posted on 04/13/2019 9:50:55 AM PDT by BeauBo
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: E. Pluribus Unum

Julian Assange has an important role yet to play.


9 posted on 04/13/2019 9:51:11 AM PDT by arthurus (g4h)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: E. Pluribus Unum

Why the Charge Against Julian Assange Makes No Mention of Espionage or 2016 Russian Hacking


I’ll take “Seth Ricn” for $400.


14 posted on 04/13/2019 10:29:24 AM PDT by kaehurowing
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: E. Pluribus Unum
1) it's easier to prove and 2) i'm glad Trump isn't tweeting about him so the RATS and his lawyers can't say he has prejudiced him and any potential jury pool
15 posted on 04/13/2019 10:39:27 AM PDT by Chode ( WeÂ’re America, Bitch!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: E. Pluribus Unum

This case is well beyond the two year Statute of limitations. There is no question that this information has been known for years!! Assange is a national hero for exposing the NSA illegally ( with out warrant) spying on every Americans Email , phone calls and text messages . Wikileaks ,after the first publication by DC LEAKS .com, truthfully exposed the fraudulent campaign practices against Hillary’s political opponent. That is something every American had a right to know.
“The Computer Fraud and Abuse Act has a two year statute of limitations that runs from “the date of the act complained of or the date of the discovery of the damage.” In Higgins, the Plaintiffs claimed that, while they “suspected” some sort of wrongdoing more than two years prior to the filing of their CFAA claim, they did not “actually discover the violations or damage” until later. The court found that “the statute of limitations ‘begins when facts that would support a cause of action are or should be apparent.’” Accordingly, when the Plaintiff suspected that those acts had occurred, those facts should have been apparent for purposes of limitations and limitations began to run at that time.”https://shawnetuma.com/2013/01/04/two-year-statute-of-limitations-of-computer-fraud-and-abuse-act-accrued-when-plaintiff-suspected-wrongdoing/


16 posted on 04/13/2019 10:40:00 AM PDT by bingoplayer
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: E. Pluribus Unum

I’ve read several reports saying that Assange developed “hygiene problems” while cooped up in the Ecuadorian embassy. One report claimed he had been smearing his feces on the walls, and this was the straw that broke his hosts’ back. Another claimed he had exhibited signs of serious psychosis. Make of that what you will.


20 posted on 04/13/2019 11:23:56 AM PDT by Blurb2350
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: E. Pluribus Unum

Neither the Podesta or DNC breaches were classified material. Also, they weren’t hacked. Podesta was a case of Phishing, and DNC was likely taken by Seth Rich.


26 posted on 04/13/2019 2:23:45 PM PDT by Cementjungle
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: E. Pluribus Unum; bitt; Liz
The indictment alleges “that in March 2010, Assange engaged in a conspiracy with Chelsea Manning, a former intelligence analyst in the U.S. Army, to assist Manning in cracking a password stored on U.S. Department of Defense computers connected to the Secret Internet Protocol Network, a U.S. government network used for classified documents and communications.”

Perhaps reading the some records would expose this for the farce it is...
UNITED STATES ARMY COURT OF CRIMINAL APPEALS

One day while working in the secure classified information facility (SCIF), appellant downloaded thousands of classified SIGACTs from both the Combined Information Data Network Exchange for Iraq (CIDNE-I) and for Afghanistan (CINDE-A) onto a compact disc (CD). She then removed the CD from the SCIF and took it to her quarters where she copied the contents onto her personal laptop computer and copied the information onto a memory card.
In January 2010, while in Maryland on mid-tour leave from her deployment, appellant uploaded the classified information contained on the memory card to the Wikileaks website.
Snip... i would come in with music on a CD-RW labelled with something like “Lady Gaga”. . . erase the music . . . then write a compressed split file . . . no-one ever suspected a thing.AR 15-6 Report -- Compromise of Classified Information to Wikileaks (redacted), Department of the Army, 14 February 2011
(Page 47 in particular, but the guy was a nut case. Read it and will see for yourself) d. ...PFC Manning allegedly downloaded classified information onto his SIPRNet computer, removed that information from his workplace and transferred that information to persons not entitled to receive classified information.
Manning didn't need any help!
Something fishy is going on.
27 posted on 04/13/2019 8:32:01 PM PDT by philman_36 (Pride breakfasted with plenty, dined with poverty and supped with infamy. Benjamin Franklin)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: E. Pluribus Unum

I still want to know why the FBI continue to tell everyone the DNC computer was hacked,the DNC refused to give the their computer to the FBI,they only saw the republican committee computer.
Jerome Corsi said on FOX today that that Muellers team wanted to admit that he talked with Assange about emails and he denies ever doing that and said he would not admit to a lie,also that Mueller believed that Corsie and Roger Stone were involved in communicating with Wikileaks on this.
I want to see the proof that the DNC computer was hacked by Russians,according to stories I have read,intelligence officials who saw the amount of data transferred and the time it took to transmit the data determined it was not possible to transmit that amount of data in the short period of time indicated on the actual emails,but it is the exact amount of time it would take to transfer from a memory stick


35 posted on 04/14/2019 1:02:13 PM PDT by ballplayer
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson