Posted on 03/31/2019 7:29:07 AM PDT by rktman
Not long after spiking an op-ed because of its decision to use “not reliable” conservative sources, USA Today published a cover story Tuesday that came across as more of an op-ed than an actual news story. The story, titled “Climate change: war, famine, drought, make more women not want children,” asks the question “is the future simply too horrific to bring children into?”
The article, written by Elizabeth Weise, profiled a series of groups including US-based Conceivable Future and Europe-based #BirthStrike. These groups consist of women who have decided to forego having children because of their fears about climate change. Weise spoke to many women in the article who have decided to opt out of motherhood, regardless of whether or not they subscribed to a larger group or not.
Eventually, the article went into full-blown activism mode; with a subheading reading “Climate change poses a real danger.” This particular section of the story cites a United Nations report warning that mankind has 12 years to act to avoid “rapid, far-reaching, and unprecedented changes in all aspects of society,” which would include “more wildfires, more droughts, more floods, rising sea levels, and the loss of almost all coral reefs.”
(Excerpt) Read more at newsbusters.org ...
AOC said the same thing, despite supposedly being a practicing Catholic. The left is anti-human and anti-life!
How insane is that?
They should embrace the latter.
Yep their real aim is to keep young Americans from having kids.
My hope is that only liberals will listen to them...
I’m so much more powerful than anyone else. How many people can claim to have single-handedly wrecked the entire earth?
Bwahahaha, losers. The future looks like me.
The average number of children for white women in France and Spain is one. The average number of children for women in Niger is seven.
The future belongs to the fertile.
Population: one of those topics exposing the less rational.
Show yourselves!
The real problem with these people having kids is the way they would be raised. Actually, the parents would most likely not raise them at all — they would go straight to day care, and thereafter be raised by strangers and LGBT-oriented public school teachers, soon after birth.
Too bad, I have another one coming. But I sure will do whatever neccessary to care about him or her.
Actually this is very good news. Anyone who can be persuaded by algore’s carbon credit ponzi scheme to give up having children for their entire life is so f*ing stupid that it’s very very very good news that they are Darwin-awarding themselves out of the gene pool. And I hope you don’t think I’m kidding. I really mean it (I know, totally series). This is a good thing. So good that I don’t feel sympathy for how cheated these uber-stupid women will certainly feel in later years.
Are all women who live in a dystopian society dystopian women?
This article provides another tidbit of evidence regarding what defines modern Democrats and other liberals. To be a Democrat or other liberal you have to know that every live birth is a cosmic failure.
I think that is a wonderful idea. The more leftist libtards that choose not to have kids, the fewer kids will be raised in disfunctional leftist “families” and subjected to indoctrination at home. Overall it helps our (conservative) chances of defeating the scourge of socialism.
*this only applies to white people.
These messages are always targeted at WHITE people.
Ack, this no children thing has been going on since the 60s. Probably long before that.
Tell the 4-wife muzzies that.
One of the best things we can do is keep that 12 year death clock count down in the forefront. When the cultist see the clock counting down but the world not dying, they will be forced into a mental paradox. Maybe some will leave the cult.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.