Posted on 02/06/2019 1:09:21 PM PST by yesthatjallen
The Post didn’t publish this because they couldn’t corroborate it. Yet they had no problem piling on against Kavanaugh.
He said/she said.
Sean Hannity read her victim statement on the air today. I believe her. As a man I cannot understand why she did not report that assault when it happened. But I’m a man, and I know a vast majority of rape and assault do not go to the police as they should.
However she did confide in her friends and others last year about what happened so this did not come out of the blue as a total surprise.
I think Fairfax’s best option at this point would be to come out as gay.
Democracy dies in darkness, my ass. They forgot to explain that they are the f’ing umbrella!
The Post didn’t publish this because they couldn’t corroborate it. Yet they had no problem piling on against Kavanaugh.
~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
All women must be believed, right?
No, no. His best option would be to admit he wore black face in the 1980s.
Democracy dies in darkness. Some might believe the compost thinks that is a great catchy slogan. When in actuality it is their objective and desire.
Or announce he’s transitioning to become a woman....
They didn’t bother with it because the guy is a DEM; it’s as simple as that.
They didn’t bother with it because the guy is a DEM; it’s as simple as that.
Actually I think his best option would be to have a 2nd front door cut into his house.
Funny how they never mention AttackWatch.......
Hoist on their own petard.
No way I’d shove my Johnson into an angry cavity with teeth.
Sounds much like Cory Booker’s bathroom escapade, except that was a guy who made the accusation. That’s why Cory was so proud to announce that he had a girlfriend.
Anyone want to go through the list of differences?
1) couldn't identify the House vs. knew *exactly* where it happened
2) touching over clothes alleged vs. oral-genital contact
3) accuser giving her name publicly UP FRONT rather than indirectly through a partisan legislator
4) accused in one case had passed NUMEROUS background checks with nothing similar on his record vs. (unknown?)
5) accuser of Kavanaugh part of all-out assault includin women dressed up as fictional characters, vs. released through a top law firm
6) accuser of Kavanaugh unavailable to committee (even though they were secretly in-state) vs. formal, specific press release
7) accuser of Kavanaugh during confirmation hearings vs. no particular political event
8) Kavanaugh received numerous testimonials in his favor from women who had worked with him for decades; vs. Fairfax quoted after accusation as saying "F*** that B***!"
On the other hand,
8) both accusers waited decades to come forward
9) both accusers are academic women from California
I do not believe her. But in a he said/she said, either one of them could be telling the truth. After the way they treated Kavanaugh though, I hope Fairfax gets thrown under the bus, and I hope she's lying to boot. That would be sweet!
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.