Posted on 01/17/2019 10:20:45 AM PST by Kaslin
I used to be a smoker. It was stupid, I know, but I did it for a very long time. I'm not alone, not unique, plenty of people made that same choice I did to take up the nasty habit when we were young and convinced we were invincible. Like tens of millions of Americans, I managed to quit and havent looked back. I would still be smoking today if not for the miracle (and it is indeed a miracle) of the e-cigarette. I vaped like a madman...and it was my bridge to a much healthier and happier lifestyle.
To paraphrase one of the greatest modern cinematic scenes: Vaping is good. Vaping works.
Youd think the scolds who lecture everyone about the dangers of smoking would be ecstatic about the dramatic drop in smoking rates in the United States thanks to this technology, but youd be wrong. The government always wants more control over people, and more of our money, so anything new, popular and effective always ends up in its regulatory crosshairs. A few decades ago, government geniuses nearly shut down a nascent and thriving company called Microsoft, for crying out loud.
There arent many people who, when they get exactly what they wanted for Christmas, complain about what they got for Christmas. That's what our busybody government regulators (often quietly or not-so-quietly fueled by competitors or sectors at risk from the societal benefits brought by the innovators) are like. The sad record shows that these people are more easily manipulated than babies, basically.
For decades, the nanny state has been lecturing smokers about quitting. They went after private property rights of restaurant and bar owners, mandating that they eliminate the rights of adults to engage in a perfectly legal (even subsidized, which huge amounts of our tax dollars going to tobacco farmers) activity in their establishments. As if people went to bars for the health benefits.
After having chased smokers out onto the streets, theyve started chasing them out of anywhere in public, and even in their own homes in some cases. What theyve never done is eliminate subsidies to tobacco farmers or simply declared cigarettes to be illegal. They wont do that, theres too much money in it for them.
Cigarettes are more and more heavily taxed, which makes them a large and important revenue stream for all levels of government. Banning them means that money dries up. So, while talking about the evils of smoking, theyre benefiting from it, at this point likely more than the behemoth companies that make them.
Thats why, even though these big government advocates are getting their way as smoking rates drop to their lowest levels in history, they have been complaining about what may be the most effective stop-smoking aid to come along ever. And, unlike the war on combustible tobacco products which has been nearly the exclusive purview of liberals, supposed free marketeers in and out of the Trump administration have joined the war on innovation by going after e-cigs.
I quit smoking on my wedding day in 2015. That was it, I was done. But I didnt go cold turkey. Anyone whos ever smoked knows how hard that is. So, as I mentioned earlier, I started vaping.
Vaping, for anyone living under a rock for the last couple of years, is a battery-powered device that allows people to inhale vapor mist with nicotine in it (though you can get it without nicotine, or even step down the levels of it incrementally) and doesnt contain all the tar and other harmful chemicals traditional cigarettes have in them. Its healthy smoking, if you will. It doesnt smell, which is something you (not to mention those around you) become acutely aware of once you quit, and the exhale is water vapor.
Its a great tool for anyone looking to quit because, as former smokers know, what to do with your hands while you engage in the activities you did when you were a smoker is why a lot of people go back to the cancer sticks.
Rather than embrace this incredibly helpful stop-smoking option, the same crowd who were hounding people to quit are, armed with some puzzling new allies, starting to treat vaping the exact same way they treated smoking. Theyre banning it in places, trying to restrict sales (thereby restricting access), taxing it like crazy, condemning it as just as evil, etc. People who love government dont actually like it when people quit smoking because it means less money from cigarette taxes. Thats why theyve never considered making it illegal, they want their taste; they want to wet their beaks.
They wont take success lying down. And since its 2019, and everything is about race to the political left, theyre even whining about who is quitting smoking now.
The LA Times lamented, Cigarette smoking is at an all-time low in the United States, but the benefits of this public health achievement are not being shared equally by all Americans. Theyre upset at the racial and socioeconomic make-up of those quitting. They write, people who live in neighborhoods with the highest smoking rates are more likely to be poor, less likely to be white, and more likely to have chronic heart or lung diseases.
People are quitting, but the wrong people are quitting, laments the left and their media pets. This is the same left that wants to further restrict access to the e-cigarettes that are helping many Americans kick the habit. This is nuts.
Smoking is down across the board, which is something that should be celebrated. They just cant bring themselves to. They should be embracing anything that helps people break the habit, but theyre demonizing one of the newest and most effective tools to come along in generations, and are actively looking to prevent its use. Like Microsoft a few decades ago, the e-cigarette industry is closer than it probably realizes to being annihilated by the government and the left. Like Microsoft smartly did a few decades ago, they'd better fight like there's no tomorrow.
“Where is the warning label for alcohol products?”
It’s on the label, just like tobacco, and vaping products
I smoked for 30 years and switched to a vaping pen I can not believe how easy it was to get off the cigarettes, I am thrilled!!! No more smell, no more ash trays, no more lighters and I have not missed or craved a cigarette at all, it has been a year since I touched a cigarette!!! Very happy!!!!
Same here. This May will be eleven years without a cigarette.
I wish you and Bloomberg would just put out a list of things you’ll allow.
Why?
At least I found it and posted it for you.
I don't lay the eggs; I merely color them.
Uh; the last two words in that sentence should be until DEATH.
Canibis is ok
Vaping nicotine is not
Is vaping canibis ok?
Is it?
If that is what you want to believe then you go on believing that.
Did you read my reply 39 where I gave a link to the lawfully required warning?
Does that warning say anything about alcohol being addictive?
To: Elsie Where is the warning label for alcohol products? Or do you contend that alcohol isn't addictive? 36 posted on 1/17/2019 4:54:47 PM by philman_36 (Pride breakfasted with plenty, dined with poverty and supped with infamy. Benjamin Franklin)
|
I was trying to make a comparison between addictive substances having, and not having, warning labels.
I really had to spell that out for you?
So why does nicotine require an addictive chemical warning while alcohol doesn't when it is an addictive chemical?
A little hypocritical, don't you think?
You've neither the time; nor I the inclination; to get started on the things GOVERNMENT does on one hand that the other knows nothing about.
We've handled this part.
But you seemed upset that the CONTENT of the labels was not addressed by me.
Since all labeling comes from the FDA there isn't one hand not knowing what the other is doing.
So sorry, it's all the same hand.
“Can you read?”
Yes, quite well. Can you? Your post had not a thing to do with the question. Your post was also wrong on the required warning.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.