Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Ted Cruz, Francis Rooney introduce constitutional amendment for 'term limits'.....
washingtonexaminer ^ | January 05, 2019 | Allison Elyse Gualtieri Night news Editor

Posted on 01/05/2019 11:46:17 PM PST by caww

"The founders never envisioned a professional political class," said Rooney, in an appearance Saturday on Fox News.

The proposal would set members of the House to three terms and senators to two terms. Presidents are limited under the 22nd Amendment to two terms, while Supreme Court justices enjoy lifetime appointments.

"This is a much better way than having these entrenched politicians who are too aligned with special interests over a period of years. I would say 18 years is plenty of time to serve your country in," he said, referring to the total time someone could spend in Congress if elected in both chambers under the amendment.

Thursday does not mark the first time Cruz has tackled the issue. He also put forward similar legislation in 2017.

(Excerpt) Read more at washingtonexaminer.com ...


TOPICS: News/Current Events; US: Florida; US: Georgia; US: Texas; US: Utah
KEYWORDS: 2020election; 2022election; contractwithamerica; davidperdue; election2020; election2022; electoralcollege; faithlesselectors; florida; francisrooney; georgia; marcorubio; mikelee; nationalpopularvote; newtgingrich; npv; piginapoke; termlimits; texas; utah
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-40 next last

1 posted on 01/05/2019 11:46:17 PM PST by caww
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: caww

Good, though I’d almost rather he start with the courts. When lifetime appointments were devised people did not live as long. I think 15 years on the district court and ten each on the court of appeal and Supreme Court. Still generous but some check on these people


2 posted on 01/05/2019 11:51:21 PM PST by j.havenfarm ( 1,500 posts as of 8/10/18. A FReeper since 2000; never shutting up!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: j.havenfarm
I can't imagine congress even bringing this to the floor.....let alone voting on it. They all see themselves as permanent furniture......I'd be shocked if this went further.
3 posted on 01/05/2019 11:54:46 PM PST by caww
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: caww

Since we never heard about it going anywhere in 2017, it likely got shelved in the first committee it hit

They’d be lucky to get 25 votes between the 2 houses for it.

Phoney-baloney jobs must be protected


4 posted on 01/06/2019 12:03:53 AM PST by digger48
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: caww

They get paid working or not, for life. That is the law to change.


5 posted on 01/06/2019 12:21:00 AM PST by Marchmain (hoh)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: caww

I think individual states would have better luck. You could mandate via some state legislative effort that you lose your qualification to run for federal-type office after 12 years in DC. Or you could make it interesting by mandating that the Senator or House member you send up...can’t purchase or own a house in DC without losing his ability to run in the next election.


6 posted on 01/06/2019 12:35:19 AM PST by pepsionice
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: caww

Amendment suggestion:

Senators and Representatives from California who are elected by ballot harvesting shall have a term limit of 30 days.


7 posted on 01/06/2019 12:58:30 AM PST by Candor7 ((Obama Fascism)http://www.americanthinker.com/articles/2009/05/barack_obama_the_quintessentia_1.html)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Candor7

Yesterday’s news. Trump needs to give it a boost. Tell the public to take names. There will be Republicans who vote against it. It shows you how long it takes to get something done.


8 posted on 01/06/2019 1:32:31 AM PST by DIRTYSECRET (urope. Why do they put up with this.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies]

To: caww

Elections are term limits...


9 posted on 01/06/2019 1:39:45 AM PST by Vendome (I've Gotta Be Me htt7ps://youtu.be/wH-pk2vZGw2M)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Candor7

10 posted on 01/06/2019 2:35:56 AM PST by caww
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies]

To: Vendome

Not if they are running every single cycle for decades.


11 posted on 01/06/2019 2:37:02 AM PST by caww
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 9 | View Replies]

To: pepsionice

Well something needs to be done about all these bench sitters who cease to recall they serve the people as soon as they take their seat ..put their feet up...and just go for the ride!


12 posted on 01/06/2019 2:39:43 AM PST by caww
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies]

To: Marchmain

They’re a “protected class” and that needs to stop for sure!


13 posted on 01/06/2019 2:40:49 AM PST by caww
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: caww

It’s about time.


14 posted on 01/06/2019 2:41:07 AM PST by HotKat (Politicians are like diapers; they need to be changed often and for the same reason. Mark Twain)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: digger48

Of course....they want to kill it before it even as a chance......put it on state ballots for elections and see what happens.


15 posted on 01/06/2019 2:42:22 AM PST by caww
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: HotKat
With all of this to go through I figure it's like another 50 yrs before it even passes through the first 5 'roadblocks.


16 posted on 01/06/2019 2:47:10 AM PST by caww
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 14 | View Replies]

To: caww

Much like voting themselves a raise, does it or will it ever exist in the private sector, no


17 posted on 01/06/2019 3:07:18 AM PST by ronnie raygun (nic dip.com)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: caww

Term limits are long overdue, but three terms is too short for the House. There is a very steep learning curve, especially for Members who do not come from state legislatures. Many are just hitting their stride after three or four years. And a lot of the heavy lifting in the House is done by experienced Members with five or six terms. I’d advocate a six term limit in the House, which would be equivalent to two terms in the Senate.


18 posted on 01/06/2019 3:19:15 AM PST by sphinx
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: caww

Yeah this will happen when hogs start pushing away from the slop trough. Read tag.


19 posted on 01/06/2019 3:28:18 AM PST by eartick (Stupidity is expecting the government that broke itself to go out and fix itself. Texan for TEXIT!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: caww

Six years for the House and twelve for the Senate? House isn’t going to like that. If this is going to have any chance of passage Cruz will have to narrow that gap.


20 posted on 01/06/2019 3:39:07 AM PST by DoodleDawg
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-40 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson