Adapt = $$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$.
On the backs of middle class taxpayers.
Earth tilting on axis... Summers hotter and winters are colder.
If it wasn’t for climate change, Chicago would still be under a mile of ice.
Issued by liberal Deep State anti-Trump bureaucrats.
The climate changes, and living things adapt.
Admittedly I was a C student in high-school biology,
but I do believe that’s how things are SUPPOSED to work.
More pukeage from the National Geographic.
I liked them much better when they used to run photos of nekid oogga boogga women.
North East was 35 deg cooler than average on Thanksgiving day!
Man must try to warm up the earth as much as possible to delay the onset of next ice age. Warming temps won’t kill many, but next ice age will kill MILLIONS.
13 different agencies participated?
13 8-?
Why, that’s almost as many as have fallen in goosestep with the Media Putsch and the Ruuushian Collusion theory..
Because there have never been wildfires in California or droughts in Iowa.
Whoa, Nelly! Backup the turnip truck. Envirokooks NEVER suggest that we adapt, only that we give up all our income and freedom. This is astonishing.
Let's see how we can adapt? Longer growing seasons? Check. Better growing conditions in more northern and far southern latitudes? Check. Fewer people freezing to death in winter? Check.
L8r
If you listen carefully you can hear the global warming alarmists moving the goal post.
Looks like I need a bigger SUV.
Here's what really causes my temperature to go up when I read this:
Have there not been wildfires before? Haven't some been particularly intense? How are the Californian fires over the past few months differed from fires in say, the last 200 years?
Have there not been droughts before, even in Iowa? What was the Dust Bowl of the 1930s? Was this recent drought in Iowa worse than the 1930s Dust Bowl that swept over the Great Plains and Midwest?
I don't think there is anything SPECIAL about these two disparate events (fires and droughts). Proponents of global warming say climate isn't weather and I'd say they're right; so why do journalists bring up these very recent fires and droughts to imply climate when they're both more likely weather events?
Prove to me--since you want to tax more, and stifle industry--that either of these things are directly related to recent (since 1990) rising temperatures.
What angers me the most is how they question our motives!
News ALERT! Conservatives live on the Earth, too!
We don't want to see the Earth a smoking ruin any more than you Leftists do, but before we make a national policy that can hurt us economically, let's come up with some definitive answers!
1. What is the worst case scenario? --ok, we know this one because it's hyped in the press constantly...
2. What is the LIKEY scenario? In other words, not worst case, but scientifically provable, like what is the temperature REALLY going to be say 50 years from now? You don't know? Then say THAT.
3. What is the BEST case scenario? We hear little of this, but such things as an extended growing season for crops, faster and stronger growing crops due to CO2 (it's got what plants crave!). More habitable land area in the far North. All of these things might happen also.
This will put a crimp in the RATs mantra:
In other words, blame every natural event on their religion of climate change.