Posted on 11/20/2018 8:31:44 PM PST by Az Joe
John Huber, the Special Prosecutor tapped by Sessions will testify at a GOP-led Congressional hearing on December 5th on the DOJs probe of the Clinton Foundation.
Side-note. Sara Carter (and John Solomon) are rumored (by the man in black) to be media connects that certain intel is released through.
The derps got theirs, and we got ours.
Anyway, that's what some people say. It would behoove to pay attention them both with that in mind.
That’s an interesting take, Lodi.
This is Jeffies’ last chance at proving he did something useful.
“Or is that your petulant anger speaking.”
This, from you, who posted the following:
“No wonder you anti-Sessions jackals were so rabid. Your disease was based on ignorance.”
You previously mentioned JR, who warned people like you about attacking people who disagree with you and calling them trolls. Merely trolls. And his advice was to “cool your jets.”
“Diseased” and “rabid” and “weak thinkers” ratchets up the language quite a degree.
This tiresome conversation is over.
according to Congressman Meadows, there is no evidence John Huber has done anything other than be appointed by Jeff Sessions.
Agree....appointing Huber was a sop to the executive branch and the right wing, there was never any serious effort to root out corruption.
The Mueller investigation needs to be terminated, but its hard to see how that happens without someone giving him a push. I have a bit more confidence in acting AG Whitaker in that regard, but not much.
Thank you for agreeing and proving that Huber reported to Sessions directly. Some believed and stated that that was impossible because Sessions was recused.
Sessions was recused. That's a fact. Apparently, he was simply being cc'ed with Huber status reports, and then supposedly the final report. Given his recusal, it certainly would be inappropriate for Sessions to get further involved with any investigation, in anyway connected to the campaign (Hillary). He swore not to do that under oath.
I was even called a, whate was it, wretched something. From Tombstone. Anyway. That was the point of contention. My source indicates that what would be "appropriate" would not include reporting to [RR] what [RR] is a party to. Which is a lot. So we can argue about what is "appropriate" and who decides now, if you like.
LOL.. So you do sense where this conversation is going.
All of the US Atorney's including Huber report directly to Rosenstein. Jeff Sessions said (quite inappropriately)under oath, that it was up to Rod Rosenstein to recuse himself, and that Rosenstein wasn't required to recuse himself. And Rod Rosenstein never did recuse himself. And Jeff Sessions certainly did recuse himself.
Seems pretty obvious what Jeff Sessions and Stephen Boyd think is "appropriate".
Yup. Several congressman have said that they can't wait to get Huber before the committee so that they can ask him what the hell he has done.
I believe they have no expectation of getting any positive answer.
It's hard to imagine at this point anybody including Whitaker standing up to the Deep State.
That said,let's see what happens. At least Whitaker hasn't recused himself like mcgoo did.
LOL
” Trust Sessions...Mid terms are safe”
If POTUS and Sessions were playing 360 D chess Sessions would still be AG. He Was FIRED!
Huber can do NOTHING but report to Sessions (now FRIRED) as Sessions himself stated in hiring Huber:
“ ...upon conclusion of his REVIEW, will receive his recommendations...”
Go back down your rabbit hole spunky.
Yup. Several congressman have said that they can’t wait to get Huber before the committee so that they can ask him what the hell he has done.
I believe they have no expectation of getting any positive answer.
Because everyone knows this is choreographed and nothing of substance will come of it. Just another episode of Beltway Theater. Red meat for the Trump supporting wing of the GOP base. Is Gowdy on this committee? It would be Deep State Trey’s beltway swan song.
In the fwiw dept, I don’t trust anyone at the DOJ or FBI.
I’m really sorry to have to say that.
5.56mm
YUP.
These clucks were supposed to be confined to their retarded Q page in FR and not pollute the rest of FR.
” Trust Sessions “ now FIRED. If he were trusted he’d still have his job.
” Mid-terms are safe “ Total bullish*t. No explanation needed.
Then the code about Assange being safe and flown to the USA long ago, rogue ICBMs flying all over the place, etc,etc.
Moral is - Its easier to believe a Big Lie than accept the fact you have been lied to.
I don’t think you have gotten over the Sessions debacle. Was that 1.3 Trillion Sealed Indictments? How is the old DS gang at Gitmo? Nothing is going to happen. Huber is going to “go the way of the IG(s)”. Say nothing and do nothing.
You missed my drift. By usual crowd I meant the professional Sessions bashers. I see that a few of them have already started on Whitaker. As well as Huber. Implicit in all of their complaining is the inference that Trump isn’t in control of his administration, is inept in his appointments, is being outmaneuvered by the Deep State and/or the his GOP rivals. They remind me of a group that used to be big here about a decade ago.
I might write a book on this syndrome/moment in history, one day. Not really, too lazy. But it is interesting.
I accept your surrender.
You may go in peace, citizen.
Oh? And what makes it apparent? Do you have a secret Larp telling you stuff too?
So you do sense where this conversation is going.
Duh. The whole discussion hinges on the "appropriateness" of the reporting/advising and to who. You lean toward [RR], who would be the subject or a witness in several potential investigations, and I lean toward Sessions, because I have what I like to call "inside knowledge" which you poo poo.
Huber reported to Sessions alone in his investigations. [RR] was out of the loop. Still shaking my head about the "Sessions was cc:d" assumption based on...what, feelings?
All of the US Atorney's including Huber report directly to Rosenstein.
All except Huber, who is on special assignment and was specifically assigned by the recused Keebler elf. Still waiting for somebody to tell me how a recused AG can assign a proxy to investigate things he's recused from even knowing or talking about.
Seems pretty obvious what Jeff Sessions and Stephen Boyd think is "appropriate".
That's nice. But keep in mind that most things I think are "pretty obvious" you would disagree with. For example, why would Sessions appoint a prosecutor to investigate someone, [RR] for example, and then have that prosecutor report to and be subject to supervision by that very subject [RR].
Or do you believe that [RR] isn't dirty? And that Sessions doesn't know it? Hell, I know it, and I'm not the AG.
*Magoo
Would he? Or is it possible that you don't understand the game?
Huber can do NOTHING but report to Sessions (now FRIRED) as Sessions himself stated in hiring Huber:
Thank you. Please explain that to those on the thread that think Huber reported to [RR], even though he was assigned and given his mandate by Sessions. At least somebody gets it.
Go back down your rabbit hole spunky.
No.
And that's MISTER Spunky, to you.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.