Posted on 11/20/2018 8:31:44 PM PST by Az Joe
John Huber, the Special Prosecutor tapped by Sessions will testify at a GOP-led Congressional hearing on December 5th on the DOJ’s probe of the Clinton Foundation.
Thanks, mom.
I can never keep those ones straight.
You can stay with the Deep Staters with no record of being a patriot...but just the opposite.
Just a'makin' stuff up as you go.
There's no there, there in your argument.
Watch this.
YOU can stay with your deep staters with no record of being a patriot...but just the opposite.
I'll go with credible patriots.
Ha. That was easy.
On second thought, I'll think for myself.
Because you say?
I agree.
At best, it’s a severe mental disorder to reject those with a long record of being a patriot (Joe diGenova/Victoria Toensing and their Uranium1 client, Douglas Campbell) and believe in Deep Staters with NO record of being a patriot.
Common Sense.
In addition to not interviewing Douglas Campbell, Huber has not interviewed Charles Ortel who has the most pertinent information on the Clinton Criminal Foundation.
Why hasn’t Huber interviewed these two patriots who can send the treasonous Clintons to prison for the remainder of their vile lives?
Why?
The ONLY answer is Huber, et al are Deep Staters and protecting their masters.
To those living in a fantasy world I’m sure dates and the chronological order of actual events are irrelevant, to them at least, as reality might otherwise intrude on the world of make believe they have worked so hard to invent, and impose on others The bizarre suggestion could also be the signature mark of a professional disinformation-ist. Unfortunately for you, neither is a good look, for someone so perpetually concerned about supporting their claim of being a supposed “Oracle” LOL.
Maybe you don't read so good. Just one teeeensy example. I don't remember PRESIDENT Trump calling Sessions a coward.
And yet you just did. See my point? You beclown yourself, goodman.
The term “common sense” is comprehended by everyone.
Yea, but is it? Then why is my "common sense" different than yours. Because I'm "unhinged"?
“It’s those who claim to support Trump yet attack his every move...”
I have not seen that on this site.
Pay strict attention to the rhetoric. Now that Sessions is gone, the "anti-Sessions jackals", full of doubt, fear, and weak-kneed trepidation, are lashing out at all manner of people in the Trump administration. Huber, Horowitz, Whitaker will be next.
The election loss and failure to "arrest somebody now" and build the wall is causing people to lose their minds. It's one thing to support Trump, but we must see what he's actually doing, trying to do, and planning to do, and support THAT.
And (this one will not sit well with some), it would be good if people would support his alternative communication channel and psyop. It has a very strong purpose and is part of Trump's game. Attacking that is attacking him.
In my well-informed opinion.
April 19, 2018 - Ogden Police will partner with state and federal law enforcement to target the “worst of the worst” violent criminals in the city as an expanded effort to a nationwide program.
Utah U.S. Attorney John Huber announced in a Thursday press conference the expanded effort of the ongoing Project Safe Neighborhoods, a program through the Department of Justice that Huber said has been in place in the area since 2002.
Huber said this is the “next level” of the program that targets repeat offenders of violent crimes within a specified area of Ogden and is the first of its kind in the state.
Yea, but is that REALLY the only answer? And are you sure you have the right question?
You assume much.
Oh, you must have missed the part about the article being "... timely when written".
"Timely when written" means it was about the reasons why Huber was a better choice than a 2nd Special Counsel, at about the time that you and the media learned about the appointment of Huber.
So, yea. Your entire rebuttal to reading a timely written, relevant article on the subject being discussed it exactly the gobbledygook and diversionary tactic that you're known for, troll. I've seen your act.
The bizarre suggestion could also be the signature mark of a professional disinformation-ist.
So now that we've established just who is making "bizarre suggestions (you), it's again funny (not funny haha, the other one) that you should bring up "professional disinformationists.
Look in the mirror, decepticon.
Concurring bump...it sure looks that way, doesn't it?
In addition to not interviewing Douglas Campbell, Huber has not interviewed Charles Ortel who has the most pertinent information on the Clinton Criminal Foundation.
Why hasn’t Huber interviewed these two patriots who can send the treasonous Clintons to prison for the remainder of their vile lives?
Why?
The ONLY answer is Huber, et al are Deep Staters and protecting their masters.
I really do get a chuckle out of the sunshine pumpers. This cake is baked and no amount of day dreaming will change that. The Democrats will get away with their crimes because the GOP won’t protect President Trump’s flanks in what would be a historic battle. It’s that simple. The moment Hillary is indicted Little Marco Rubio, “I voted for my wife” Romney, Sentator sAsse from Nebraska would run to the nearest camera and knee cap POTUS. The Democrat media would then use that veneer of “bipartisan” opposition as a hammer to bash an isolated POTUS endlessly. The impeachment drum beats would drown out the rest of the MAGA agenda and the Trump admin would be paralyzed.
“I don’t remember PRESIDENT Trump calling Sessions a coward.”
Sessions’s actions that Trump often delineated are the actions of a coward, i.e., not telling him before his confirmation that he intended to recuse his miserable self.
“You beclown yourself, goodman.”
Only in your own little mind, and your “goodman” thing is tiresome.
“Then why is my “common sense” different than yours.”
I am never reminded of the concept of “common sense” when I read your posts.
“Now that Sessions is gone, the “anti-Sessions jackals”, full of doubt, fear, and weak-kneed trepidation, are lashing out at all manner of people in the Trump administration. Huber, Horowitz, Whitaker will be next.”
Now that does not make sense. Why should those of us who wanted Sessions out, and you would be hard pressed to find a Trump supporter who did not, including Trump of course, be filled with doubt, fear, and weak-kneed trepidation? Some DOJ officials are in that state of mind, afraid that with Sessions out, someone may come in who will actually hold them to account. In fact, the MSM is suggesting Trump is obstructing justice by firing Sessions. Obama appointees Huber and Horowitz (Sessions requested Rosenstein as his Deputy, and appointed Huber) have been criticized often by people with real well-informed opinions, such as DiGenova, John Solomon, Greg Jarrett, etc.
Awww, really?
a.) Read Grassley and Gowdy's letter to the DOJ requesting action on investigations. What and who?
b.) Read Session's response letter back to them, explaining the appointment of Huber and his mandate and areas to be investigated.
c.) Read the article I posted above, if you haven't already.
d.) Read yesterday's article explaining tht Humber will testify before Congress and about what.
And, after doing all that, tell me again that Huber was only looking into "things local to Utah".
Are you really trying to tell FR that Huber is going to Congress on December 5 to talk about "things local to Utah"?
I expect better from you, Goldy.
The dots are there. Connect them. Unless you know better and are just arguing to argue.
It's absolutely NOT as you said. You couldn't be more wrong. Huber was to report DIRECTLY to Sessions. Check the paperwork.
I said that Sessions reports both to the DAG AND the AG. And it is as I stated.
(excerpt from Boyd/Sessions memos)
LOL. This from FR's resident Qing of Qooks. Your disease is based on ignorance and delusion.
I wear your remark as a badge of honor.
I remember back in November 2017, when Sara Carter came on Sean Hannity's show and said that she had anonymous sources from the FBI telling her that Sessions had put prosecutors on the case. And then in January, we got the release of the Sessions memo, quoting the Boyd memo, mentioning Huber.
Both of those things happened right when there was tremendous pressure to appoint an independent prosecutor.
Both seemed fishy.
It's absolutely NOT as you said. You couldn't be more wrong. Huber was to report DIRECTLY to Sessions. Check the paperwork.
I said that SessionsHuber reports both to the DAG AND the AG. And it is as I stated.
(excerpt from Boyd/Sessions memos)
No wonder you anti-Sessions jackals were so rabid. Your disease was based on ignorance. I wonder how you (the honest one) would have felt if you knew certain basic facts. I guess we'll never know. LOL. This from FR's resident Qing of Qooks. Your disease is based on ignorance and delusion.
I wear your remark as a badge of honor.
Yea, but are they really? Or is that your petulant anger speaking.
Cold logic works better, goodman.
Only in your own little mind,
No. With your own words and wrongness do you beclown yourself. Don't shoot the messenger, goodman.
and your “goodman” thing is tiresome.
Your state of weariness does not concern me, goodman.
I am never reminded of the concept of “common sense” when I read your posts.
You confuse "common sense" with agreement. It's a habit if the weak thinkers.
Why should those of us who wanted Sessions out... be filled with doubt, fear, and weak-kneed trepidation?
You tell me. You tell me why your kind runs around like the afore-mentioned "pack of jackals" attacking anybody that doesn't buy into your "sky is falling", "it's not gonna work, man", "put her in charge" doomsday screeching constant scenario. At some point, we all have to trust that Trump is doing the best he can under the circumstances.
Or we can NOT trust him, and run around like chickens with our heads cut off, complaining about EVERY SINGLE MOVE and calling EVERYBODY deep state who doesn't immediately do what you think they should when you want them to do it.
I happen to think he's doing EXTREMELY well, which is where I and the jackals diverge.
You got your idea of whose derpish and I got mine. You get your opinions from those you listed. I get mine from them as well, along with another (Voldemort). It's a matter of discernment, goodman. Oh, and common sense. Which I have in in an overflowing multitude.
Goodman.
It was all about the midterms. The careerist GOP and their big donors hate Trump. They did not want to spend one penny of political capital defending him.
Removing Rosenstein for his conflicts of interest, confirming a new AG, reigning in Mueller and addressing REAL interference in our elections by “allies” (foreign spying on Trump) would have dominated the run up to the midterms.
The GOP wanted no part of that. Regardless of how many crimes the Democrats committed. They’d much preferred to have a hobbled POTUS and the ability to shape the beltway agenda (Omnibus garbage bill, no wall funding, etc.)
Thank you for agreeing and proving that Huber reported to Sessions directly. Some believed and stated that that was impossible because Sessions was recused. I was even called a, whate was it, wretched something. From Tombstone. Anyway. That was the point of contention.
My source indicates that what would be "appropriate" would not include reporting to [RR] what [RR] is a party to. Which is a lot.
So we can argue about what is "appropriate" and who decides now, if you like.
This from FR's resident Qing of Qooks. You style me correctly, goodman. But be careful. That's a dangerous letter to be tossing around here.
Your disease is based on ignorance and delusion.
Red pills cure disease, or haven't you heard.
I wear your remark as a badge of honor.
Just so long as you wear it, I am pleased.
Goodman.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.