I said that Sessions reports both to the DAG AND the AG. And it is as I stated. Thank you for agreeing and proving that Huber reported to Sessions directly. Some believed and stated that that was impossible because Sessions was recused.
Sessions was recused. That's a fact. Apparently, he was simply being cc'ed with Huber status reports, and then supposedly the final report. Given his recusal, it certainly would be inappropriate for Sessions to get further involved with any investigation, in anyway connected to the campaign (Hillary). He swore not to do that under oath.
I was even called a, whate was it, wretched something. From Tombstone. Anyway. That was the point of contention. My source indicates that what would be "appropriate" would not include reporting to [RR] what [RR] is a party to. Which is a lot. So we can argue about what is "appropriate" and who decides now, if you like.
LOL.. So you do sense where this conversation is going.
All of the US Atorney's including Huber report directly to Rosenstein. Jeff Sessions said (quite inappropriately)under oath, that it was up to Rod Rosenstein to recuse himself, and that Rosenstein wasn't required to recuse himself. And Rod Rosenstein never did recuse himself. And Jeff Sessions certainly did recuse himself.
Seems pretty obvious what Jeff Sessions and Stephen Boyd think is "appropriate".
Apparently, he was simply being cc'ed with Huber status reports, and then supposedly the final report. Oh? And what makes it apparent? Do you have a secret Larp telling you stuff too?
So you do sense where this conversation is going.
Duh. The whole discussion hinges on the "appropriateness" of the reporting/advising and to who. You lean toward [RR], who would be the subject or a witness in several potential investigations, and I lean toward Sessions, because I have what I like to call "inside knowledge" which you poo poo.
Huber reported to Sessions alone in his investigations. [RR] was out of the loop. Still shaking my head about the "Sessions was cc:d" assumption based on...what, feelings?
All of the US Atorney's including Huber report directly to Rosenstein.
All except Huber, who is on special assignment and was specifically assigned by the recused Keebler elf. Still waiting for somebody to tell me how a recused AG can assign a proxy to investigate things he's recused from even knowing or talking about.
Seems pretty obvious what Jeff Sessions and Stephen Boyd think is "appropriate".
That's nice. But keep in mind that most things I think are "pretty obvious" you would disagree with. For example, why would Sessions appoint a prosecutor to investigate someone, [RR] for example, and then have that prosecutor report to and be subject to supervision by that very subject [RR].
Or do you believe that [RR] isn't dirty? And that Sessions doesn't know it? Hell, I know it, and I'm not the AG.