Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Hillary Clinton: Abrams would have already won Georgia race if ‘she had a fair election’
Fox News ^ | 14 NOV 2018 | Alex Pappas

Posted on 11/14/2018 9:47:04 AM PST by E. Pluribus Unum

Former Democratic presidential nominee Hillary Clinton on Tuesday questioned the legitimacy of Georgia’s gubernatorial contest, saying Democrat Stacey Abrams would have already won the uncalled contest if the election was fair.

“If she had a fair election, she already would have won,” Clinton said Tuesday night at the University of Texas at Austin, where she accepted an award.

Clinton, who may be considering another run for president in 2020, accused the “people on the other side” of “undoing” voting rights in the election. Supporters of Abrams have made accusations of voter suppression, long voting lines and other balloting problems.

“Stacey is really in the arena and she is fighting for the right to vote and have your vote counted,” Clinton said, praising Abrams “for continuing that fight.”

During the 2016 contest, Clinton expressed worry that then-candidate Donald Trump wouldn’t accept defeat if she beat him in the election.

(Excerpt) Read more at foxnews.com ...


TOPICS: News/Current Events
KEYWORDS:
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-40 last
To: proust

Right. Arrest.


21 posted on 11/14/2018 10:08:29 AM PST by Mozilla (Truth Is Stranger than Fiction)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 14 | View Replies]

To: proust
This is what happens when you don’t lock up criminals.

Bingo! Should have fired Sessions right after recusal. At the very least it would have spared us the cult of Q

22 posted on 11/14/2018 10:08:34 AM PST by datricker (Cut Taxes Repeal ACA Deport DACA - Americans First, Build the Wall, Lock her up MAGA!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 14 | View Replies]

To: TADSLOS
anybody-not-willing-to-accept-the-results-of-an-election-1247161
23 posted on 11/14/2018 10:09:10 AM PST by timestax
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 20 | View Replies]

To: E. Pluribus Unum

“Voter suppression” —> I.e., the Dem didn’t win outright. That argument nas as much power as crying “racism.” But, unfortunately, both work.


24 posted on 11/14/2018 10:09:31 AM PST by ProtectOurFreedom
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: E. Pluribus Unum; All

Two Obama appointed federal judges have gotten involved allowing more votes counted from democrat stronghold Gwinnett county. It’s amazing we knew in no time that the Broward county election supervisor had originally been appointed by Jeb Bush but the media doesn’t like to report who appointed these judges ruling in favor of Democrat candidates. Shocking


25 posted on 11/14/2018 10:14:03 AM PST by newzjunkey (Are we tired of winning yet?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: E. Pluribus Unum

26 posted on 11/14/2018 10:26:10 AM PST by KitJ (Shall not be infringed...)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: E. Pluribus Unum

27 posted on 11/14/2018 10:27:04 AM PST by \/\/ayne (I regret that I have but one subscription cancellation notice to give to my local newspaper.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: E. Pluribus Unum

Don’t worry!! (trust)Sessions will ask Q to have the anons punish Clinton with memes. Handcuffs are impatient, emotional and illogical. Trust the plan!!!


28 posted on 11/14/2018 10:41:56 AM PST by SENTINEL (Kneel down to God. Stand up to tyrants. STICK TO YOUR GUNS !)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: TADSLOS

This means you, Abrams........and Gillum and Nelson.

29 posted on 11/14/2018 11:09:52 AM PST by Liz (Our side has 8 trillion bullets; the other side doesn't know which bathroom to use.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 20 | View Replies]

To: E. Pluribus Unum

How did democrats cheating result in a dem loss?


30 posted on 11/14/2018 11:12:26 AM PST by TonyM (Score Event)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: E. Pluribus Unum

A fair election for Hillary would be one in which straight white males were not allowed to vote—other than lawyers.


31 posted on 11/14/2018 11:49:14 AM PST by Verginius Rufus
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: E. Pluribus Unum

“fair”

That’s another word definition the libs have changed.


32 posted on 11/14/2018 11:50:54 AM PST by bgill (CDC site, "We don't know. how people are infected with Ebola.")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: E. Pluribus Unum

The chronic liar and integrity-free loser wouldn’t recognize “fair” if it bit her on her ample (and smelly) a**. What a pusillanimous poltroon.


33 posted on 11/14/2018 11:53:56 AM PST by hal ogen (First Amendment or Reeducation Camp?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: E. Pluribus Unum
Hey Hillary!

Since we agree you are an expert on election fraud, perhaps you could tell us about the evidence you found in the Georgia race?

34 posted on 11/14/2018 11:58:41 AM PST by G Larry (There is no great virtue in bargaining with the Devil)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: E. Pluribus Unum

So where was the part of the first line where it would say “without any evidence”, like they do all the time with what Trump says.

I think it should be standard. “Hillary clinton said, contrary to all evidence, and without presenting any basis for her claim, that Abrams would have won a fair election”.


35 posted on 11/14/2018 12:24:24 PM PST by CharlesWayneCT
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Catsrus

Come on you old battleaxe, what was unfair about the election. I defy you to come up with a valid answer. You are just an old blowhard!


36 posted on 11/14/2018 4:54:00 PM PST by maxwellsmart_agent (.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: maxwellsmart_agent

Surely you are directing your post at Hillary and not me? LOL


37 posted on 11/14/2018 5:06:50 PM PST by Catsrus (I)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 36 | View Replies]

To: Catsrus

Yes, surely at Hillary!


38 posted on 11/14/2018 5:20:31 PM PST by maxwellsmart_agent (.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 37 | View Replies]

To: E. Pluribus Unum; BillyBoy; fieldmarshaldj; LS; Galactic Overlord-In-Chief; randita; GOPsterinMA; ..

Lost in this recount nonsense.

In the GA Sec of State race, there is gonna be runoff (50% was needed to win outright) between the Republican Candidate, State Rep. Brad Raffen-something and former Rat Congressman John Barrow. Thank you very much losertarians. Georgia should consider icing this runoff law.

Barrow CANNOT be allowed to win or else he’ll steal the state for the democrats in 2020. Whats her face may be pressing this fruitless challenge soley to agitate the rat base into turning up for the runoff.


39 posted on 11/16/2018 5:02:33 AM PST by Impy (I have no virtue to signal.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Impy

Florida was definitely also intended to distract attention from all the other election thefts occurring across the country.


40 posted on 11/16/2018 8:55:14 AM PST by E. Pluribus Unum (Democracy dies when Democrats refuse to accept the result of a democratic election they didn't win.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 39 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-40 last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson