Posted on 11/03/2018 5:28:06 AM PDT by Kaslin
A woman who accused Justice Brett Kavanaugh of sexual assault admitted to congressional investigators she made up her claims to "get attention."
According to a letter sent to Attorney General Jeff Sessions late Friday afternoon, Senate Judiciary Committee Chairman Chuck Grassley referred Judy Munro-Leighton for criminal prosecution and revealed her actions were part of a ploy to take down Kavanaugh's nomination.
From the letter, bolding is mine:
Given her relatively unique name, Committee investigators were able to use open-source research to locate Ms. Munro-Leighton and determine that she: (1) is a left-wing activist; (2) is decades older than Judge Kavanaugh; and (3) lives in neither the Washington DC area nor California, but in Kentucky.
On November 1, 2018, Committee investigators connected with Ms. Munro-Leighton by phone and spoke with her about the sexual-assault allegations against Judge Kavanaugh she had made to the Committee. Under questioning by Committee investigators, Ms. Munro-Leighton admitted, contrary to her prior claims, that she had not been sexually assaulted by Judge Kavanaugh and was not the author of the original “Jane Doe” letter. When directly asked by Committee investigators if she was, as she had claimed, the “Jane Doe” from Oceanside California who had sent the letter to Senator Harris, she admitted: “No, no, no. I did that as a way to grab attention.
She further confessed to Committee investigators that (1) she “just wanted to get attention”; (2) “it was a tactic”; and (3) “that was just a ploy.” She told Committee investigators that she had called Congress multiple times during the Kavanaugh hearing process – including prior to the time Dr. Ford’s allegations surfaced – to oppose his nomination.
Regarding the false sexual-assault allegation she made via her email to the Committee, she said: “I was angry, and I sent it out.” When asked by Committee investigators whether she had ever met Judge Kavanaugh, she said: “Oh Lord, no.”
Grassley has also referred Julie Swetnik, Michael Avanetti and an unnamed man for criminal prosecution after making false claims to congressional investigators.
"The Committee is grateful to citizens who come forward with relevant information in good faith, even if they are not one hundred percent sure about what they know...But when individuals intentionally mislead the Committee, they divert Committee resources during time-sensitive investigations and materially impede our work. Such acts are not only unfair; they are potentially illegal," Grassley wrote. "It is illegal to make materially false, fictitious, or fraudulent statements to Congressional investigators. It is illegal to obstruct Committee investigations."
“If she had only had a top Democrat lawyer like Michael Avenatti, he’d have advised her to keep her mouth shut, double down on the accusation, and get rich off the book and movie contracts.”
Yep, she could be rakin’ in the dough, like Stormy, oh, wait, Stormy has to pay Trump’s legal fees plus. Stormy’s life is rather Stormy just now, along with Avenatti’s.
Awww come on. Ballsey-Ford needs some time to enjoy her “go fund me” million dollars and install some more doors on her house.
I want them to become a warning to others.
It seems we don’t do that in this country anymore.
Lying by omission. It’s as bad as lying.
She doesn’t even need to show her PHOTO...?!
Check it out:
It’s nearly impossible to find a SINGLE photo of her, the freakin’ LIAR..!
ZERO privacy for the dude, INFINITE privacy for the lying woman accuser:
UNSUSTAINABLE.
Veritas needs to get a video or at least a sound bite of a real voice on that fraud Ford.
You can bet our President will get the word out to all during his upcoming rally’s. May GOD bless our President and keep him healthy and safe.
ping
Here's her remodeled house (going on since 2008) finally finished after she added more anti-claustrophia excape doors with her "go fund me" loot.
Justice delayed is justice denied.
HANDCUFFS!
And throw away the key.
Gee, I wonder what that house looked like before it was remodeled?
People like her are so oblivious to the world around them. Her casual comments imply that no one should take objection to what she did. She was angry, therefore took steps to show her anger and so what! This country is infested with the likes of her and she’s in her seventies? Some people have never learned and never will. Will go to their graves fat, dumb and happy!
Other posters say there isn’t anything online about her but when her picture does show up, she’ll look like the typical demon activist...Rosie O’Donnell type..all ugly to the bone!
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.