Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Online Free Speech Is Dead – GAB Faces Imminent Shutdown
Liberty Nation ^ | 28 October 2018 | Mark Angelides

Posted on 10/28/2018 8:59:45 AM PDT by E. Pluribus Unum

click here to read article


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 41-6061-8081-100101-118 next last
To: Boomer
You have it all wrong.

We are commanded to love, especially to love the Jews (Second Greatest Commandment). The eleven Jews murdered while worshiping in the Etz Chaim (Tree of Life) synagogue in Pittsburgh were martyred for being Jews. Those who risked their lives, and those wounded trying to save them, are heroes.

It is probably the worst act of antisemitism on American soil.

Antisemitism is a grave sin which kills the soul. Everyone should guard one's heart against grave sins.

Thou shalt not avenge, nor bear any grudge against the children of thy people, but thou shalt love thy neighbour as thyself: I am the LORD.

...

And one of the scribes came, and having heard them reasoning together, and perceiving that he had answered them well, asked him, Which is the first commandment of all? And Jesus answered him, The first of all the commandments is, Hear, O Israel; The Lord our God is one Lord: And thou shalt love the Lord thy God with all thy heart, and with all thy soul, and with all thy mind, and with all thy strength: this is the first commandment. And the second is like, namely this, Thou shalt love thy neighbour as thyself. There is none other commandment greater than these.

...

Brethren, I write no new commandment unto you, but an old commandment which ye had from the beginning. The old commandment is the word which ye have heard from the beginning. Again, a new commandment I write unto you, which thing is true in him and in you: because the darkness is past, and the true light now shineth. He that saith he is in the light, and hateth his brother, is in darkness even until now. He that loveth his brother abideth in the light, and there is none occasion of stumbling in him. But he that hateth his brother is in darkness, and walketh in darkness, and knoweth not whither he goeth, because that darkness hath blinded his eyes.


Leviticus, Catholic chapter nineteen, Protestant verse eighteen,
Mark, Catholic chapter twelve, Protestant verses twenty eight to thirty one,
First John, Catholic chapter two, Protestant verses seven to eleven,
as authorized, but not authored, by King James

81 posted on 10/29/2018 5:39:51 AM PDT by af_vet_1981 (The bus came by and I got on, That's when it all began.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 80 | View Replies]

To: DiogenesLamp
How do you expect that will work out?

I will inherit eternal life.
82 posted on 10/29/2018 5:44:42 AM PDT by af_vet_1981 (The bus came by and I got on, That's when it all began.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 78 | View Replies]

To: af_vet_1981

I see you’re a devout Christian of one persuasion or another. While I believe in God I don’t hang on every word in the Bible as being the indisputable truth. It was written by men. Organized religion is great for teaching the basic fundamentals of right and wrong but it was also written to control mass populations to keep them in line.

I’ll stick with the facts as I see and understand them. You, as always, are free to follow whatever doctrine suits you.

One fact is many Jewish people in America are secular Jews; not the Jews you write about. A very different breed.


83 posted on 10/29/2018 6:01:39 AM PDT by Boomer (Better Dead Than Dem)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 81 | View Replies]

To: DiogenesLamp

You can’t explain your position more because it is silly and fails to understand basic reality. You CANNOT force businesses to carry all traffic. It runs into ALL the problems I already pointed out. They CANNOT serve all customers. Even the lunch counter can refuse service.

Freedom of speech has ALWAYS ended at property. And it MUST continue to be that. You cannot force your message onto somebody’s wall, paper, stage, hard drive or T1 line. And that is a good thing. We all loved it when The Dixie Chick were losing record contracts and radio play. In your new “all traffic” world that wouldn’t happen. Your all traffic model is not only logistically impossible, it’s the tyranny of the minority. It’s just plain a bad idea no matter how you slice it.


84 posted on 10/29/2018 7:43:59 AM PDT by discostu (Every gun makes its own tune.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 74 | View Replies]

To: John Robinson; Jim Robinson

‘Free speech’ social platform Gab has gone offline:

https://www.freerepublic.com/focus/f-news/3700844/posts


85 posted on 10/29/2018 8:15:59 AM PDT by Red Badger (I lie to pollsters......................ALL Of THEM!...................)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: Red Badger

Only temporarily. Will be back likely this week sometime. Had to move the site to another server provider.


86 posted on 10/29/2018 8:28:40 AM PDT by Ron H.
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 85 | View Replies]

To: Ron H.
Here is the latest posted information from Andrew Torba regarding Gab.com posted on their front door:

Gab has spent the past 48 hours proudly working with the DOJ and FBI to bring justice to an alleged terrorist. Because of the data we provided, they now have plenty of evidence for their case. In the midst of this Gab has been no-platformed by essential internet infrastructure providers at every level. We are the most censored, smeared, and no-platformed startup in history, which means we are a threat to the media and to the Silicon Valley Oligarchy.

Gab isn’t going anywhere.

It doesn’t matter what you write. It doesn’t matter what the sophist talking heads say on TV. It doesn’t matter what verified nobodies say on Twitter. We have plenty of options, resources, and support. We will exercise every possible avenue to keep Gab online and defend free speech and individual liberty for all people.

You have all just made Gab a nationally recognized brand as the home of free speech online at a time when Silicon Valley is stifling political speech they disagree with to interfere in a US election.

The internet is not reality. TV is not reality. 80% of normal everyday people agree with Gab and support free expression and liberty. The online outrage mob and mainstream media spin machine are the minority opinion. People are waking up, so please keep pointing the finger at a social network instead of pointing the finger at the alleged shooter who holds sole responsibility for his actions.

No-platform us all you want. Ban us all you want. Smear us all you want.

You can’t stop an idea.

As we transition to a new hosting provider Gab will be inaccessible for a period of time. We are working around the clock to get Gab.com back online. Thank you and remember to speak freely.

Andrew Torba, CEO Gab.com

87 posted on 10/29/2018 9:32:55 AM PDT by Ron H.
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 86 | View Replies]

To: discostu
You have a faulty understanding of my position, and you also have a faulty understanding of the larger world. I'm not going to spend time trying to straighten you out.

It's time to drop a big government hammer on "private" corporations that want to censor speech. The concerns about doing this are abstract and hypothetical. The damage and dangers caused by doing nothing are quite apparent and real.

88 posted on 10/29/2018 11:32:45 AM PDT by DiogenesLamp ("of parents owing allegiance to no other sovereignty.")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 84 | View Replies]

To: DiogenesLamp
It's time to drop a big government hammer on "private" corporations that want to...

Sigh.
89 posted on 10/29/2018 11:51:35 AM PDT by Borges
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 88 | View Replies]

To: DiogenesLamp

Nope. I understand your position quite well. You want to force companies to carry things on their property. That’s a bad idea. And also a clear violation of the 1st. Part of freedom of speech is the freedom to NOT. Their property, their message.

The damage and dangers that would be caused by your idea are beyond measure. Because now you’re giving the government the ability to declare what is and isn’t censorship and punishing companies accordingly. Just look at all the pinheads on the left who want to outlaw disagreeing with global warming, and consider what happens with your idea if they get put in charge. Always ask yourself what the other side would do with your increase in government power, if the idea scares you you know it’s a bad idea.


90 posted on 10/29/2018 12:35:00 PM PDT by discostu (Every gun makes its own tune.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 88 | View Replies]

To: discostu
Nope. I understand your position quite well.

No you don't. If you did, you wouldn't keep rattling on.

Speech is no one's property.

91 posted on 10/29/2018 1:39:47 PM PDT by DiogenesLamp ("of parents owing allegiance to no other sovereignty.")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 90 | View Replies]

To: Borges
Sigh.

I'm sighing too, and it's because people want to put forth some abstract theoretical danger to avoid doing anything of real consequence about a very deadly existing danger.

Adam Smith warned about cartels. I wouldn't think I would have to explain Adam Smith to anyone on a conservative website.

92 posted on 10/29/2018 1:42:49 PM PDT by DiogenesLamp ("of parents owing allegiance to no other sovereignty.")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 89 | View Replies]

To: DiogenesLamp

I do understand. I also understand that you know you’re wrong, which is why you’re on all insults and not even trying to actually make your case.

BUZZZ Wrong again. As soon as speech hits somebody else’s stuff it IS COMPLETELY AND TOTALLY property. Remember that the next time you change the channel away from a political ad. If you were right that would be illegal.


93 posted on 10/29/2018 1:46:18 PM PDT by discostu (Every gun makes its own tune.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 91 | View Replies]

To: DiogenesLamp

If you go on someone’s property, the only “right” you have is the right to leave. If they don’t like what you say, they can tell you to leave. And you have to leave.


94 posted on 10/29/2018 1:48:24 PM PDT by Borges
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 91 | View Replies]

To: discostu

Not at all. I’ve just argued with you before.


95 posted on 10/29/2018 1:50:07 PM PDT by DiogenesLamp ("of parents owing allegiance to no other sovereignty.")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 93 | View Replies]

To: DiogenesLamp

Yes you have. And it’s always the same, you say something stupid, and only use insults after that. We both know you’re full of crap. And this is no exception.


96 posted on 10/29/2018 1:52:29 PM PDT by discostu (Every gun makes its own tune.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 95 | View Replies]

To: Borges
If you go on someone’s property, the only “right” you have is the right to leave.

Any communications system which relies on the PUBLIC to participate is not anyone's "property." If you want it to be your property, make it a private club with the public not allowed. If it accepts public speech, it must be forced to accept all of the public's speech, with the usual exceptions regarding illegal speech.

People need to stop regarding communications systems as anyone's property. If they serve the mass public, they are a "commons." If they don't want to be a commons, they need to refrain from soliciting the public.

We wouldn't tolerate any communications system that refused to carry any speech by blacks, and we should not tolerate any communications system that refuses to carry speech for some 40% of the public that regard themselves as conservatives.

Don't want to carry speech? Don't be a communications company.

This thing is a real threat to our lives, our society, and our system of governance. It is akin to private corporations having a monopoly on the air which we all need to breath.

97 posted on 10/29/2018 1:58:18 PM PDT by DiogenesLamp ("of parents owing allegiance to no other sovereignty.")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 94 | View Replies]

To: neverevergiveup
In my opinion, apart from the pornography - which is a separate and different issue, the anti-whatever traffic needs to be tolerated, as this is the only way for discussions to occur and for people's views to be challenged. Under the USSR, hatred and tribalism was suppressed by the thumb of totalitarianism - but it was never dealt with in a way that would substantively address the issues people had with one another. Once the USSR was no more, these groups began fighting each other, as the simmering hatred had just percolated all that time they were suppressed and unaddressed.

Threats should never be tolerated, but differences of opinion have to be allowed in a society with free speech.


It's frightening how many FReepers here (and long term ones too) just do not understand that.
98 posted on 10/29/2018 1:58:58 PM PDT by farming pharmer
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 21 | View Replies]

To: discostu

If you regard my having no further patience with you as an insult, that’s on you. So far as I’m concerned, you have earned the pigeonhole into which you’ve been put.


99 posted on 10/29/2018 2:01:04 PM PDT by DiogenesLamp ("of parents owing allegiance to no other sovereignty.")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 96 | View Replies]

To: DiogenesLamp

You are aware this site routinely expels posters right? These social media sites are not public utilities. They are not subject to “Common Carrier’ law like telephone service.


100 posted on 10/29/2018 2:05:35 PM PDT by Borges
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 97 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 41-6061-8081-100101-118 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson