Posted on 09/28/2018 1:55:39 AM PDT by zeestephen
Alan Dershowitz did not hold back his thoughts when asked about Rachel Mitchell’s cross-examination during Christine Blasey Ford’s testimony Thursday on Capitol Hill.
(Excerpt) Read more at dailycaller.com ...
She made 2 good points that I saw.She asked Ford if anyone came forward to say they drove her home.I think she asked if anyone from the party came forward to say they were there.I’m glad she was soft and there are no sound bites of the Republicans grilling Ford and she was a smart choice.When the Judge spoke and she kept up with the pointless questions they fired her on the spot which was funny.:)Where did she go.I bet Trump called and said let her go and then release the Kraken’s which is what happened.
Yes, you nailed it. That was their intent.
I support that- I saw him in action. In fact, at one point I thought he was going to lose his temper at the disorder
That one freaked me out before I even knew who she(?) was, sitting behind Feinstein, staring straight into the camera. Very dark vibe.
YEP ... THANX.
Agree completely with your assessment.
Mitchell did her job perfectly.
I also believe she already knew she would only be asking Kavanaugh a couple of questions. That’s why she got right to the point with him. She got him on record for the most important denials and that was all that was necessary.
Also if you have heard any of her post hearing comments there is no doubt she is one of us.
Read about here exploits here at the Chicago LGBT Hall of Fame, ( who knew ?).
Also if you have heard any of her post hearing comments there is no doubt she is one of us.
+++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
I have not heard any of her post-hearing comments. I’m sure she’s heard & gotten to the bottom of a lot of false/vague accusations during her 29 years (or whatever it was) of work so she knew what she was dealing with when it came to Ford. I’m sure she was sickened at the thought of such a good man being destroyed by uncorroborated accusations from decades ago, not that she would say that in public.
What’s with the skunk hair dye job? Is that a style statement for dykes?
“Her job was to have a uterus and she did.”
Are you sure about that?
Jones is quoted in the local press as voting no. I just sent him an email for what good it will do. I wasn’t very nice. I told him his job is to represent Alabama, not Schumer and Feinstein.
And remember Dersh has personal reasons never to “believe” the woman.
Just another example of why the 17th Amendment should be repealed.
At the first sign of Victory, we should run for the hills!
Elections have consequences and Roy Moore did not win. How we need that vote now. It looks like a tight squeeze assuming it gets to the Senate.
And it was idiots on our side that caused that loss. They try to pretend the problem was a "bad candidate" when in fact it was the combination of the Democrat/Media attack machine, along with deliberate backstabbing by prominent Republicans.
The lesson here should be "Don't backstab our candidates!"
I agree with Dershie. She was waaaay out of her league.
Damn man-hating dyke!
IOW, Rachel’s marching orders were “Don’t rock the boat!” She was an obedient little elf.
Hah! You are most perceptive! (((((hugs)))))!
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.