Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Document Expert: Discrepancies Discovered in Feinstein’s Christine Ford Letter Looks Like Fraud
The Gateway Pundit ^ | September 25, 2018 | Jim Hoft

Posted on 09/25/2018 4:03:19 PM PDT by detective

Shortened title.

Full tile: Document Expert: Multiple Discrepancies Discovered in Senator Feinstein’s Christine Ford Letter – Looks Like a Fraud

Another Internet sleuth released a series of tweets that are damning to the letter provided by Senator Feinstein from Dr. Ford who accused Judge Kavanaugh of sexual misconduct nearly 40 years ago.

The Internet is the place where individuals with different backgrounds and skill sets are able to combine their efforts to address the many lies in the MSM today. This happens all the time and the MSM hates it when their lies are uncovered or questioned.

Yesterday Dr. Dannielle (Dossy) Blumenthal released a series of tweets that dissect and refute the letter provided by Senator Feinstein from the accuser of Judge Kavanaugh. Dr. Ford’s letter is full of flaws which lead one to realize something just doesn’t add up!

(Excerpt) Read more at thegatewaypundit.com ...


TOPICS: Crime/Corruption; Government
KEYWORDS: christineford; dannielleblumenthal; feinstein; ford; fraud; kavanaugh; letter; postedseveraltimes; ucallthatanexcerpt; worstexcerptever
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 61-8081-100101-120121-136 next last
To: detective

More BS from Gateway Pundit. Oooh.. a PhD... in creative writing. Two and a half years’ experience... reading constituents’ letters. So a professor made a few minor grammar errors, like unnecessary capitalization, a particular favorite of Trump’s. And she threw in some adjectives!!

There is such ample evidence that Blasey is a phony, why give such easy grist to the liberals?


101 posted on 09/25/2018 6:46:42 PM PDT by dangus ("The floor of Hell is paved with the skulls of bishops" -- St. Athanasius)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: detective
There are more problems with this letter:

More grammatical mistakes:

“Both were 1-2 years older than me . . . ”
S/B: Both were 1-2 years older than I . . .

“I felt guilty and compelled as a citizen about the idea of not saying anything.”
This so ungrammatical it does not even make sense.

“I expect you will maintain this as confidential until we have further opportunity . . . ”
S/B: “I expect you will maintain this as confidential until we have had further opportunity . . . ”

Also, a lot of the diction sounds like cop-speak:

“I exited the bathroom . . . ”
I went out of the bathroom; I left the bathroom

“He conducted these acts with the assistance of his close friend . . .”
He did these things with the help of his close frend

“tried to disrobe me”
tried to undress me

102 posted on 09/25/2018 6:53:28 PM PDT by T Ruth (Mohammedanism shall be destroyed.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: T Ruth
1-2

I'm sorry, you need an en-dash.

This so ungrammatical

I'm sorry, you need a verb.

fend

I'm sorry, you need an r.

103 posted on 09/25/2018 6:59:44 PM PDT by aspasia
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 102 | View Replies]

To: detective

Put it in the falsified document file along with the Free Republic-debunked Obama birth certificate.


104 posted on 09/25/2018 7:02:13 PM PDT by luvbach1 (I hope Trump runs roughshod over the inevitable obstuctionists, Dems, progs, libs, or RINOs!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: detective

It was written by someone from the lame stream media. Most journalists write at a 6 grade level, and there are plenty of them out there that lack skill.


105 posted on 09/25/2018 7:05:46 PM PDT by W650
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: ctdonath2

I would agree with you BUT as a techie who “fixes” such machines, assuming a machine is involved, I’ve observed enlarged fonts typically occur across an entire line, not a piece of the line comprising a full sentence in the first text line of a paragraph. And these days, people fax documents electronically, with no FAX machine involved. Mrs. egf3 regularly electronically transmits docs from within her WP app at work .

BTW you CAN edit and save emails within MS Outlook Pro, the only tagged proof of it is in the ‘saved’ date and time edit markers, not the ‘sent’ / ‘received’ date and time markers.


106 posted on 09/25/2018 7:09:16 PM PDT by egfowler3 (Vacancy)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 83 | View Replies]

To: aspasia
fend

I'm sorry, you need an r.

You're wrong. You need an "r"; I need an "i."

107 posted on 09/25/2018 7:24:44 PM PDT by T Ruth (Mohammedanism shall be destroyed.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 103 | View Replies]

To: funfan
Has anyone seen the redacted letter for comparison?

I have not.

108 posted on 09/25/2018 7:43:39 PM PDT by TChad
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 70 | View Replies]

To: StolarStorm
Excellent analysis. I wonder who did write it. The most glaring to me is the use of medical treated versus psychotherapy ... given her profession.

You mean, because an MD can prescribe penicillin, but a pyschotherapist (*cough* hat tip to Saturday Night Live's Jeopardy with Sean Connery *cough*) cannot ?

109 posted on 09/25/2018 7:45:53 PM PDT by grey_whiskers (The opinions are solely those of the author and are subject to change without notice.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: Vic S
It is odd that she said in the first line "“I am writing to express my concerns about the current nominee to the Supreme Court.”

and not,

“I am writing to express my concerns about Judge Brett Kavanaugh.”

Kavenaugh's name doesn't appear until the second paragraph. It almost looks like it was written long before Kavenaugh was nominated and was ready to go should some male get picked. There was probably a 'female' letter ready to go with a few "______", .

(Satire) All-Purpose Democrat Last Minute Smear Form

110 posted on 09/25/2018 7:47:46 PM PDT by grey_whiskers (The opinions are solely those of the author and are subject to change without notice.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 28 | View Replies]

To: T Ruth
: )

An i will do!

111 posted on 09/25/2018 7:53:45 PM PDT by aspasia
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 107 | View Replies]

To: detective

This is all I’m going to contribute to this ridiculous debate:

If you believe that the letter is fake - without regard to any corresponding testimony or denial by Ford to have written it - have lots of lotion.

I’m not getting banned again due to a stupid document debate.

I will NOT respond to comments.


112 posted on 09/25/2018 8:01:05 PM PDT by logi_cal869 (-cynicus-)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Paladin2
What was Google’s opinion re Hussein and Bill Errs?


They were so sure Ayers wrote Obama’s auto biography that they actually publicly listed Ayers as the author on google books

113 posted on 09/25/2018 8:56:13 PM PDT by rdcbn
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 60 | View Replies]

To: timestax
Ramon_Escoabr_Endorses_Dianne_Feinstein
114 posted on 09/25/2018 10:25:40 PM PDT by timestax
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 63 | View Replies]

To: timestax
Ramon_Escoabr_Endorses_Dianne_Feinstein

115 posted on 09/25/2018 10:26:32 PM PDT by timestax
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 61 | View Replies]

To: McGavin999
I don’t have a dog g a n this fight but remember, Ms Ford went to an exclusive girls school so her English language should be top quality.


Except the stuff written in the fancy girls school year book sounds to me like “early Valley Girl” talk...:^)

116 posted on 09/25/2018 10:54:36 PM PDT by az_gila
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 38 | View Replies]

To: AdmSmith; AnonymousConservative; Berosus; Bockscar; cardinal4; ColdOne; Convert from ECUSA; ...

http://www.freerepublic.com/focus/news/3690059/posts
http://www.freerepublic.com/focus/chat/3690070/posts
http://www.freerepublic.com/focus/chat/3690520/posts
http://www.freerepublic.com/focus/chat/3690572/posts


117 posted on 09/26/2018 12:38:42 AM PDT by SunkenCiv (www.tapatalk.com/groups/godsgravesglyphs/, forum.darwincentral.org, www.gopbriefingroom.com)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: Mollypitcher1

Technically 1980’s would refer only to possesive of the year 1980. The decade 1980s possesive would be 1980s’. The only appropriate use of the apostrophe is in the truncation as in ‘80s.


118 posted on 09/26/2018 3:46:01 AM PDT by .44 Special (Tiamid Buarsh)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 51 | View Replies]

To: .44 Special

On first reading of the text of the letter it did seem rather stilted. I had the impression that it was written by a male instead of a female.


119 posted on 09/26/2018 3:54:10 AM PDT by .44 Special (Tiamid Buarsh)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 118 | View Replies]

To: rdcbn

Whoa,

that was apparently a long time ago in a distant galaxy....


120 posted on 09/26/2018 5:32:24 AM PDT by Paladin2
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 113 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 61-8081-100101-120121-136 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson