Posted on 09/25/2018 4:03:19 PM PDT by detective
Shortened title.
Full tile: Document Expert: Multiple Discrepancies Discovered in Senator Feinstein’s Christine Ford Letter – Looks Like a Fraud
Another Internet sleuth released a series of tweets that are damning to the letter provided by Senator Feinstein from Dr. Ford who accused Judge Kavanaugh of sexual misconduct nearly 40 years ago.
The Internet is the place where individuals with different backgrounds and skill sets are able to combine their efforts to address the many lies in the MSM today. This happens all the time and the MSM hates it when their lies are uncovered or questioned.
Yesterday Dr. Dannielle (Dossy) Blumenthal released a series of tweets that dissect and refute the letter provided by Senator Feinstein from the accuser of Judge Kavanaugh. Dr. Ford’s letter is full of flaws which lead one to realize something just doesn’t add up!
(Excerpt) Read more at thegatewaypundit.com ...
Roughly half of the peeps in a group are below average.
What do they call the MD with the lowest grades in his class?
33) The awkward English and poor grammar is interspersed with flowery language.
“The two scrapped with each other,” for example.
“I was able to take this opportune moment.”
I know a Nigerian prince who writes just like this!
That’s not a comma; it’s an apostrophe.
We need to get some of her writing.
More interesting to me is what I heard on Howie Carr this afternoon - apparently a letter sent directly to a member of the Senate to be used in a Senate hearing is considered sworn testimony, while one sent to a member of the House is not - this may explain why Ford sent the letter originally to her Representative Eschoo or whatever - she thought she could make the accusation and not be held responsible if it were investigated - when the letter was forwarded to Feinstein it must have become a legally recognized allegation subject to the possibility of perjury and other sanctions - no wonder Ford is trying to get out of testifying....
Does the fraud and defamation of character road lead to George Soros, Hillary Clinton, or Zero or all three?
The correct was to write that is 1980s! One uses the ', when you leave out the century...i.e. '80s!
This is the way it has always been taught and to the best of my knowledge, it still IS being taught this way.
On a written letter, if no signature, it is fake
Meh. Pretty weak stuff, but so is her accusation. “He touched my clothes!” is a very long way from “He raped me!”
1980s or 1980’s is a tricky one.
.....................................
1980s is a period during which we had great musicians.........
Subject, noun
1980’s haircuts were very different......
The apostrophe denotes possession....The haircuts were owned by the 1980s.
Actually I’m more interested in her family’s connections to the CIA and the timeline of that.
I think the arguments presented are pretty weak. Lots of degreed people make similar errors. A college degree, even a Ph.D., doesn’t mean that someone is a competent writer with attention to detail, although I’d expect him to take extra care when drafting official correspondence.
It is interesting that Ford says she’ll be in the mid-Atlantic on August 7th, and back in California on the 10th — how will she travel that distance so quickly if she is so claustrophobic that she cannot fly on a plane?
.
Fake is real if you’re a Dem.
That is a very sticky little detail, isn’t it?
I imagine nobody would be able to get around that legal distinction by pointing out that she didn't actually send the letter to Feinstein, but that she gave it to the U.S. Postal Service and THEY gave it to Feinstein. :-P
Maybe the witch is okay with open air broomsticks.
I find the analysis inconclusive, but it also misses a more critical point.
Christine Ford is a widely published author with many professional paper and even a book or two to her credit.
A far more persuasive approach would be to compare the writing style in the letter to writing style in her other published works.
Authors a grammatical style signature that is often quite distinct which allows identification of a documents author.
For example, GOOGLE programmers were able to analyze Barak Obama’s autobiography and determine that the real author was ex Weather Underground terrorist Bill Ayers.
A quick comparison between the letter and Fords other work would show pretty conclusively if she wrote it.
She was ADVISED - she didn't "thought"...
Makes more sense to me.
What was Google’s opinion re Hussein and Bill Errs?
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.