Not yet you don't.
Just because something happened
doesn't mean it was planned.
Posted on 09/24/2018 9:59:50 AM PDT by 11th_VA
I don't buy into a lot of the "Q" nonsense and a don't accept conspiracy theories at face value, but there is no doubt in my mind that the bizarre NYT-Rosenstein charade of last Friday is directly tied to the Kavanaugh confirmation process somehow.
Good grief, not more of this moronic chess crap.
Well laid out.
I was ridiculed for saying that Sessions recusal was part of Trump’s plan. I stand exonerated!
Not a chance. Try again!
You're not.
Wouldn't need to wait for Francisco if Sessions didn't recuse himself.
Yep, this was all explained by Q months ago. For a LARP /sarc, Q’s been right a lot.
Q said trust Sessions.
Q was wrong.
Thanks 11th_VA.
“Mr. Sessions recused himself from Russia investigations. This was done by design - but that’s another story.”
Ah, this is one of those parody articles. I get it.
Q never said; “trust FreeReign”
Q was right
Same empty logic
Yes bit of a predictive parody. But like most there is a bit of truth behind it.
He is the current Solicitor General of the United States in the Donald Trump administration. For those into Identity politics, he is the first Asian American confirmed by the United States Senate to hold the position. (Born in Syracuse NY to Filipino legal immigrant parents.)
He served as a law clerk for Judge J. Michael Luttig of the United States Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit, and then for Associate Justice Antonin Scalia of the Supreme Court of the United States during the 1997 term
He joined the Washington, D.C. office of the law firm Jones Day, eventually becoming the chair of the firm's Government Regulation Practice. While at Jones Day, he appeared several times before the Supreme Court, including:
McDonnell v. United States, which involved the meaning of "official act" under federal bribery statutes;
Zubik v. Burwell, which involved the application of the Religious Freedom Restoration Act to regulations related to insurance coverage for contraception;
NLRB v. Noel Canning, which involved the Constitution's recess appointment power
Also worked with Ted Cruz on Medellin v Texas (even if an international treaty may constitute an international commitment, it is not binding domestic law)
“There is a psychological term for the state in which one attributes certain patterns of events to mean that something desired to happen is actually happening- even when nothing of the sort is the case.”
Yeah. It’s called, “Believing Is Seeing!”
All the big polls in the last 3 months have been within 3 points of a 45-41 split, with no trends in either direction. That's within the margin of error, and the usual Dem oversampling puts it as a dead heat still. Gravis poll from FEB was also Gillum +3. Nothing has changed... and with 10-15% undecided, there's just no telling anything.
Btw, “Q” missed the next move, which is Trump fires Sessions after the midterms. Since Noel Francisco has already been confirmed by the Senate, Trump can appoint him as new AG.
But that shoots the whole “Trust Sessions!” idiocy in the a$$, eh?
You heard it here first.
(Q predicted I’d post this).
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.