Posted on 09/21/2018 1:40:30 PM PDT by detective
Ranking Member of the Senate Judiciary Committee Dianne Feinstein is still refusing to turn over the unredacted version of a letter sent to her office in July. The letter is from Christine Blasey Ford, the woman accusing Supreme Court nominee Brett Kavanaugh of sexual assault during a party in high school nearly 40 years ago. Kavanaugh completely rejects the accusation and says he was never at a party like the one Ford describes.
Late Wednesday evening, Chairman Chuck Grassley sent a letter to Feinstein again asking for the unredacted version of the letter to be turned over to his staff.
(Excerpt) Read more at townhall.com ...
(a) No unredacted letter, no delay.
(b) Get in the car and start driving.
You know, this she is “afraid to fly” stuff is a joke. She has a PhD in Psychology, right?
Therefore:
(a) She should know that fear of flying is unreasonable; driving significantly more dangerous, alternatively
(b) she could hypnotize herself and make believe the plane is just a big Mercedes.
What a joke. And ruining a good man’s reputation. Afraid to fly!! Spare me. This is who they are relying on??
Feinstein hasn’t finished writing, I mean reading it yet.
LOL! I was going to post the same thing.
4) parts of the letter include easily refutable facts
It’s evidence. If she won’t turn it over the Sgt at Arms should go get it.
That’s OK, ol’ Vinegar Chuck will make a prune face and...give in
My thoughts exactly.
You are correct, of course. He needs to do that and more.
Kavanaugh may indeed be confirmed and join the court at its next session in early October; however, it certainly appears at this point that in the face of an ambush, Grassley is an impotent commander.
We are watching the street-fighting element of the left in essence attempt to rewrite the Constitution.
Diane Feinstein is showing poor faith in her Senate colleagues, does she have trust issues?
Perhaps there is no letter at all, and this was a huge ruse.
If so, then somebody is going to have a LOT of
‘splainin’ to do, Lucy.
So Ford can make up a new story that is different from
her letter.
"you [Feinstein] didn’t raise Dr. Ford’s allegations previously because you wanted to protect Dr. Ford’s anonymity."and:
"Had Dr. Ford not made her allegations public via the Washington Post over the weekend.."Did Ford out herself to the Post? If she didn't who did (who else could have but Ford, Feinstein and Dems)?
Either way, it pokes big holes in their 'really wanted anonymity" story.
Tell her she has 4 hours to turn it over. If not, schedule the vote for Monday.
But... I assume the GOP wants to win.
Dog ate it
The letter is much like 0bungo’s certificate of live birth, one has to wait until the ink dries
It will be a layered pdf or would you accept a fax from Waco?
Kavanagh’s terms...
1. Unredacted letter submitted.
2. He bats last.
3. All questions are fair game.
My “Max BS” meter is now pegged and broken. Who do I sue???
The letter probably has many inconsistencies with what Ford has said publicly. If it was consistent, Feinstein would have given the letter to Grassly and the public.
Ford is either a bald faced liar or nut case. I vote bald faced liar working in conjunction with Feinstein and the DNC.
ps
Feinstein makes pond scum look like a good thing. She is just plain damn bad and evil.
Show up at Feinstein’s office today demanding a copy of the letter. If she says no, hand her a subpeona to appear Saturday morning with it.
If she’s going to play games with information important to the nomination process, she clearly doesn’t belong on the committee.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.