Real Treason: Brennan Defended Hamas and Hezbollah

John Brennan is all over the news, playing the victim for having his security clearance pulled. It's obvious from his record that he should have never had any access to classified information considering his toxic and radical views.

After Helsinki, Brennan accused President Trump of treason. He's since doubled down on the accusation. But if you want to see treason, look at his own past comments. As I discuss in today's article on Twitter's censoring of David Horowitz when he tried to discuss Brennan's record and Islamic anti-Semitism.

Rush L. was covering the fact that it was Brennan’s DCI job that directed see eye aaaaa to spy on Diane Feinstein.

Which, he would be tasked to do (clever “cover”) to look into the chi-com spies on her staff— (proven), and uh... “provide” side info to his other handlers... the Russians.

The old soviet state used islamofascists and islamist organizations to forward the Communist International’s agenda. Lenin wrote the “islamics” have the military organization to aid the expansion of the soviet state- and used them effectively in... the Ukraine against the “rich” kulak peasants (see: the Holodomor).

Just a thought. The real head of the anti-trump russian interference (hillary’s gig) was.. Brennan. The sidelining of Feinstein currently stems from the “bad press” of chi-coms in her office, a useful result for russian counter-chinese efforts (for russian state needs I mean).

I read Robert Conquest’s related books: “The Great Terror: A Reassessment”, and “The Harvest of Sorrow”.

I did not notice any “islamic” connection or application. Did I miss this; I consider it quite important. Can you elaborate a little?

More background:

John Brennan: “Jihad Is a Holy Struggle” (Flashback 2010)
Middle East Quarterly ^ | June 1 2010 | N/a
Posted on August 16, 2018 at 4:17:53 PM PDT by ifinnegan

Nor do we describe our enemy as “jihadists” or “Islamists” because jihad is a holy struggle, a legitimate tenet of Islam, meaning to purify oneself or one’s community, and there is nothing holy or legitimate or Islamic about murdering innocent men, women, and children.

http://www.freerepublic.com/focus/f-news/3679815/posts

Have always been fascinated that Conquest started out as a Communist at Oxford (open member of CP of Great Britain), and a Stalinist.

Yes, in Conquest’s work (I believe this is in “Harvest of Sorrow”, not certain though) and others (who got this from former Soviet archives)— he uncovered letters from Lenin to the commissars in charge of the Ukraine and into what was the Muslim East. The early letters to consolidate the Ukraine Soviet and force large collective farms He directed the commissars and NKVD operatives to use the Islamic mullahs where these were the “kulaks” of that religion— to get their people on the side of the Soviet, to cooperate promising aid to the mullahs. And then, having done that the instruction was to remove their people from their farms either to Gulags or remove their means of farming and seed stock— starvation in place (and concurrently to kill the mullahs). These are in one of Conquest’s works (am sorry I cannot quote the title- it was a surprise to read about it, and the deviousness (above and beyond how they handled the Orthodox Church and other Christians. Ths include the letters from Lenin to the International on the usefulness of the islamic community to spread communism (citing their discipline, aesthetics of denial more formidable than Christians, etc).

In the Soviet archives history there is this on the resistance of islamic groups to the Soviets. There are references in the archives of getting the islamics to “come over” to use their groups in the conversion to the Soviet State, and then eliminate the leadership of the groups. All of which Stalin continued with Lenin’s beliefs on the topic of islamic religion and the expansion of the Soviets, and in the international movement: http://soviethistory.msu.edu/1921-2/the-muslim-east/the-muslim-east-texts/appeal-to-the-moslems-of-russia-and-the-east/

After Stalin died it opened up the use of islam in Comintern goals internationally politically. Continuing Lenin’s beliefs that islam was a good fit with Communism.

Here’s another interesting post..from anti-communist Indian publishing:

https://swarajyamag.com/politics/eight-things-about-lenin-that-left-does-not-want-you-to-know

Yes, and have felt that this was Stalin’s use of islamics, though he trusted no-one. To get rid of all the jews from the original Politburo— the ones who knew about his deviousness toward Lenin (who used the jews in the same way as islam, for the organizational discipline and then to break them).

Stalin used islamocommunists to eliminate jews. He and Stalin were rather different parts of the Leftist spectrum— hitler less Left than the commies, but both Left, and anti-semitic. Seems to fit since Semites are the root culture that divided.

Should add that the original Politburo (some of them, the early ones and their factions) knew that Stalin was an informer and a thug for the Tsar’s Ohkrana secret police. He lived in fear of them until he eliminated every possible person who might know, and a whole lot more who didn’t know a thing... just to be sure.

The black humor look at Stalin’s psychoses— is the comedy “Red Monarch” very funny in a macabre way. And appalling use of the State in all human thought. Orwell would approve of this comedy.

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

The Three Amigos