Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Ohio Special Election: Democrat Turnout 87% of 2016 Total — GOP Turnout Only 40% of 2016 Total
GP ^ | August 7,2018 | Jim Hoft

Posted on 08/08/2018 5:53:27 AM PDT by Hojczyk

On Tuesday Troy Balderson defeated Democrat Danny O’Connor by less than 1% of the vote.

Balderson had 100,052 votes compared to Tiberi’s 251,266 votes in 2016 or 40% of the 2016 turnout.

Danny O’Connor had 98,364 votes on Tuesday compared to 112,638 votes received by Democrat Ed Albertson in 2016 or 87% of the 2016 Turnout.

This should concern Republican party leaders. The GOP to do a better job or Trump is going to face a Democrat Congress ready to impeach him in 2019.

(Excerpt) Read more at thegatewaypundit.com ...


TOPICS: News/Current Events; Politics/Elections; US: Ohio
KEYWORDS: 2018midterms; balderson; dannyoconnor; gotv; oh2018; ohiospecialelection; troybalderson; turnout
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 61-8081-100101-120121-125 next last
To: Theodore R.

I agree. A problem with conservative voters is that they can be cantankerous, and not inclined to get out to the polls except once every two years. I think the turnout will improve in November and that some of these close special elections, where the Dems and media were able to focus their resources, will not be nearly this close. It would be nice if people were more patriotic but the reality is that there are fewer engaged activists on the conservative side than on the lib/left side. And at the end of the day, a win is a win.


101 posted on 08/08/2018 8:35:11 AM PDT by littleharbour ("You take on the intel community they have six ways from Sunday at getting back at you" C. Schumer)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 90 | View Replies]

To: tiki

low GOP turnout isn’t fraud, it is laziness and stupidity.


102 posted on 08/08/2018 8:40:28 AM PDT by Wayne07
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: Alas Babylon!; Buckeye McFrog

Exactly right, Alas Babylon!!

Sent from my iPhone


103 posted on 08/08/2018 8:44:08 AM PDT by onyx (JOIN 300 CLUB BY DONATING $34 MONTHLY! TRUMP'S WAY IS THE WIINNING WAY)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 65 | View Replies]

To: be-baw

Just in case the uniparty has figured it’s easier to remove/nullify votes than add them, hope someone trusts but verifies that turnout data....


104 posted on 08/08/2018 8:45:51 AM PDT by mewzilla (Has the FBI been spying on members of Congress?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 12 | View Replies]

To: wiseprince

You are so seriously uninformed I don’t know where to begin. Do you not realize the Democrats are in full Resistance mode desperately trying to protect the FISA Warrants from becoming public? Do you not realize that Adam Shifty Schiff would become Committee Chairman which means that he would bury all “truthful/factual evidence? Do you not realize that the Democrats already have over 60 members who have risen to vote “aye” on the floor of the House in favor of Impeaching President Trump?

I could go on but I’m in a public setting using my iPhone.


105 posted on 08/08/2018 9:01:14 AM PDT by onyx (JOIN 300 CLUB BY DONATING $34 MONTHLY! TRUMP'S WAY IS THE WIINNING WAY)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 91 | View Replies]

To: mewzilla

“hope someone trusts but verifies that turnout data....”

Heck, I wish all vote tallies were verified. In this case, I’m guessing that the totals will be accepted if the winning candidate exceeds whatever % is required in order to avoid a recount. This one might be close enough for a recount.

An unusual factor in this case is that it was an election that puts someone in Congress. As a result, there was a ton of media attention that wouldn’t happen in a normal election. Throw in that Democrats undoubtedly threw the kitchen sink at their voters and generated an uncommon amount of determination to try to embarrass Trump.

Whatever the result, it would be a mistake to think the anything can be extrapolate from it going into November.


106 posted on 08/08/2018 9:03:01 AM PDT by be-baw (still seeking...)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 104 | View Replies]

To: deport

The unofficial (i.e. non-canvassed) numbers I have suggest a few things.

Balderson underperformed Trump in every county in the District — except his home one. Even so, he won five out of seven counties by *double digit* margins. Had he gotten one percent more in Delaware County, it would have been SIX of seven counties.

O’Connor outperformed Clinton in every county except Balderson’s home county. What made this election close, in all probability, is that 1/3rd of the voters live in Franklin County, which includes Columbus.


107 posted on 08/08/2018 9:14:09 AM PDT by Sam_Damon
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 92 | View Replies]

To: mlo

It’s not 87% of all Democrats and 40% of all Republicans. It’s 87% and 40% of the 2016 turnout.


I realize that.

But 87% of any way you look at it sounds inflated. Especially considering that primaries are not noted for big turnout.

But the 40% republican....a disgrace. With the corruption demonstrated and even admitted to in DC, everyone with any moral compass at all should vote.

The candidate might be a rino, but he can not be worse than Pelosi or Mad Maxine becoming the house leader.


108 posted on 08/08/2018 9:26:05 AM PDT by old curmudgeon (There is no situation so terrible, so disgraceful, that the federal government can not make worse)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 100 | View Replies]

To: Hojczyk

This is really an apples vs. oranges comparison times two, no, times three.

First, he’s comparing 2018 with 2016 which was a presidential election.
Second, he’s comparing a primary/special election with a general election.
And third, he’s comparing a 2018 race between two new candidates with a 2016 race where the GOP candidate was a 16-year incumbent.

This race had only about 10,000 less votes than the 2014 general election which Tiberi won going away, 150,000 to 61,000. A lot of Tiberi’s 2014 votes were probably from voters who don’t register, or even vote, GOP, just because he’d been in office long enough to help a ton of constituents.

Balderson will get considerably more votes in the general election rematch, but the total vote is likely to not be significantly higher than the 210,000 that voted in 2014, maybe 230-240,000 but almost certainly not anywhere near the 2016 total vote. The question is whether the Dems can find enough to more than match his higher total. Maybe not, after all the excitement they’ve already generated, but it’s an open question obviously.


109 posted on 08/08/2018 9:29:41 AM PDT by Norseman (Defund the Left....completely!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: wiseprince

Still strongly disagree.

When democrats are out of power, they’re funny. But in power, they’re deadly.

AND Trump has managed to get the GOPe to give him the Tax Cut and the judges.

Don’t throw the baby out with the bathwater!

democrats will NEVER give him the Wall—the GOPe will also fight him on it, but not to the death of America like the democrats will do. I can see him getting the Wall, an end to chain and lottery migration and starting merit-based migration in the next two years IF the democrats don’t get back the House.

And not every Republican is a GOPe. What about Goodlatte, Jordan, Meadows, Nunces, etc.? Let’s not simply lump them in with what you call “Repukes”. The Freedom Caucus NEEDS to be supported.

We can only fight ONE election at a time. God has given us a great opportunity with Trump, but it will not last forever. The next election we face is this November. Let’s get thru that BEFORE speculating about 2020.


110 posted on 08/08/2018 9:48:44 AM PDT by Alas Babylon! (MAGAMarchOnWashington.com)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 91 | View Replies]

To: Wayne07

Apples and oranges, GOP had a low turnout, Dims had a Fake turnout. There is no way that % of Dims voted yesterday.


111 posted on 08/08/2018 9:59:52 AM PDT by tiki
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 102 | View Replies]

To: old curmudgeon
...it is a scandal that only 40% of the republicans voted.

Only 40% turn-out in such an important election, tends to indicate something more than mere voter complacency. I have a feeling that we're looking at multiple effects here, such as:

1. A bland and uninspiring candidate who didn't motivate voters.
2. Republican candidate greatly outspent by the Democrat.
3. Governor Kasich talking down the R candidate and the party.
4. The left-liberal press (as usual) pushing for the Dem.
5. Lack of support from the GOP-e/RNC.

112 posted on 08/08/2018 10:04:02 AM PDT by Windflier (Pitchforks and torches ripen on the vine. Left too long, they become black rifles.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 19 | View Replies]

To: tiki

We know GOP turnout in previous election, and we know how much it dropped. Lazy, stupid, and unmotivated. voter fraud is a convenient excuse to stay at home. We know voter fraud happens, and might be 1% or 2% of vote, not 20%.


113 posted on 08/08/2018 10:17:15 AM PDT by Wayne07
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 111 | View Replies]

To: tiki

Even though that is true then you won’t convince many people here of that. And that is why the democrats get away with it. Will someone check to see if all of those votes are legitimate ? Will someone sample those voters to see if they claim to have even voted ? The Democrats have a ton of Soros funded groups who know and use all forms of vote fraud.


114 posted on 08/08/2018 10:54:45 AM PDT by Revel
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: for-q-clinton
"This doesn’t look like a blue wave is coming"

I think the blue wave is tinged heavily with green, much less of a problem.

115 posted on 08/08/2018 11:13:10 AM PDT by HangThemHigh (Entropy is not what it used to be.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: JoeRed

OK, it wasn’t clear from the post I was answering. Still, it looks a little high. 2016 was a presidential year. To get close to that in a special election, is somewhat suspicious, IMO.


116 posted on 08/08/2018 11:17:45 AM PDT by chimera
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 49 | View Replies]

To: kara37
It does seem high. 2016 was a presidential election year. This was a special election, essentially an off-off year. To come close to the numbers of a presidential election year, and 87% is certainly close, makes me a little leery of the results, specially given the ‘Rat tendencies to manufacture votes and dig up deceased voters.
117 posted on 08/08/2018 11:21:33 AM PDT by chimera
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 46 | View Replies]

To: Revel

Well, Alyssa Milano wants it investigated because she thinks the Russians made too many vote for the Green candidates. Since conservatives can’t challenge voter fraud Trump needs to investigate it for a lib with TDS.


118 posted on 08/08/2018 12:25:49 PM PDT by tiki
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 114 | View Replies]

To: Mollypitcher1

“Why do you say he is a RINO? If he is, I don’t think Trump would have supported him.”

My mistake, I may be confusing him with someone else.


119 posted on 08/08/2018 1:57:37 PM PDT by JPJones (More tariffs, less income tax.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 94 | View Replies]

To: vette6387

Thanks for your post in support of mine.

In my post I posed the question, was Ohio’s 12th District where John Kasich was the U.S. House Rep for years.

Here’s what I copied from the Washington Post - confirms what I heard from a source and suspected was true:

“Voting results from the special election in Ohio’s 12th District to fill the seat vacated by Patrick J. Tiberi. ... Tiberi, a Republican, left Congress in January to lead the Ohio Business Roundtable. The central Ohio district, once represented by Ohio Gov. John Kasich, consists of suburban areas around Columbus.”

Bingo.

A Republican district, yes, but Kasich, Tiberi, Balderson aren’t cut from the cloth we need. I heard a caller on a.m. talk radio this morning say that Trump got him to come out and vote. He was mad at Tiberi for voting against Obamacare repeal and almost didn’t vote for Balderson...


120 posted on 08/08/2018 4:07:21 PM PDT by txrangerette
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 75 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 61-8081-100101-120121-125 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson