Athiests are the children of Marx, and the enemies of America.
Didn't Congress invent that a long time ago.
They claim it's intelligence, but we all know it isn't.
Atheists don’t believe in artificial intelligence
Watch ex-machine and see what secularism gets you in IA.
The problem to be solved is for society to recognize the irrational, illogical and arrogant intellectual ignorance in the secular humanist belief that all is knowable to us.
Our own experience in scientific research keeps demonstrating the opposite of the secular humanists ignorant arrogance.
Everytime we make progress, scientifically, whether just here on earth, or in physics, or exploring the cosmos, each achievement reveals an even wider window of more and deeper questions than our initial question knew was possible.
G-d’s universe is like an infinite onion with layers we can never reach, no matter how many layers we can identify. It is arrogant folly to believe we can understand it all.
Hey! They figured out with a computer what any wise man knows. Trouble gets more people looking for God.
What we are calling AI is nothing more than intricate if-then programming. Even the neural networks they incorporate are not AI. Neural networks merely memorize patterns.
True intelligence requires conscious self-awareness. Consciousness is a quantum mechanical phenomenon. You will never achieve it through software alone.
Paging Hari Seldon, please answer the white courtesy phone...
(That aside, this is hokum, we have millenia of history to show us what happens when religions collide. Within that historical framework, atheism is the weakest of all, and is actively killing itself in the world today. The only reason it hasn’t succeeded so far is because it’s been allowed to leech on the body of what had been the strongest religion. What happens next remains to be seen.)
The fascinating and arrogant assumption is that people are supposed to move towards « secularism » (atheism) as they evolve.
Of course, they’re wrong - the more we learn, the more we become certain that all around us was never an accident.
Well, I think most of us agree that if we could switch Muslims to atheists, they couldn’t get any worse.
bump
Imagine you’re an idiot bringing 50,000 third-world primitives into your country.
Because it is false.
I feel deeply uncomfortable that one of my models accidentally produced a criterion for killing religious leaders.”
If a religious leader chooses to put him self on the path of terrorism he has put himself outside of the moral protections of a life of faith.
Anyone willing to kill to advance their religion should be put down like the rabid dog that they are.
Putting such people in prison is counterproductive to which our American prisons systems give direct evidence.
One of the most productive places for Islamic conversions is the American penal system. Islamic evangelism should be banned there. Adherents to Islam should be segregated from the general population. Islam should be considered a communicable disease requiring quarantine.
I guess we know where his sympathies lie.
People returning to their faith is a plunge backward in to superstition.
Having read the entire article I am rather disappointed that it really did not posit a theory as to why atheism is unpopular.
The only expression in the article that comes close is the theory that secularism is not advancing in the US as fast as in Europe because the national government does not have complete control of education.
Lucky for the Atlantic that there is no truth in labeling law for atricles.
So . . . what was the point of this? Trying to find ways to sell atheism? Communism without the forced atheism? Religion bad, atheism good but only unpopular? And why does the word “atheism” appear absolutely nowhere in the article?
Utter clickbait.